User System

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming 0% Incomplete	Desktop 0% Incomplete	Workstation 0% Incomplete


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (32nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 68 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 66.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics	6.14% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Memory	32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Very high background CPU (100%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

System	HP
Motherboard	HP 82B4
Memory	25 GB free of 32 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20220728
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Nov 25 '22 at 01:20
Run Duration	189 Seconds
Run User	USA-User
Background CPU	100%

PC Performing below expectations (32^nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i7-7700-$167 256,717 User benchmarks, average bench 76% U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 4 GHz (avg) Performing way below expectations (9^th percentile)	66.5% Good	Memory 73.8 1-Core 82.3 2-Core 196 65% 117 Pts	4-Core 318 8-Core 607 55% 462 Pts	64-Core 592 37% 592 Pts
Poor: 63% ↑ This bench: 66.5% Great: 84%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Intel HD 630 (Desktop Kaby Lake) 153,031 User benchmarks, average bench 5% HP(103C 82B4) 1GB Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 31.0.101.2111 Performing way above expectations (85^th percentile)	6.14% Terrible	Lighting 6.7 Reflection 8.2 Parallax 7.8 6% 7.57 fps	MRender 9.1 Gravity 6.9 Splatting 10.7 7% 8.9 fps
Poor: 3% ↑ This bench: 6.14% Great: 7%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k
WD Purple 4TB (2014)-$73 8,426 User benchmarks, average bench 71% 2TB free Firmware: 80.00A80 Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete		Read 134 Write 107 Mixed 71.6 77% 104 MB/s	4K Read 0.2 4K Write 0.4 4K Mixed 0.1 27% 0.23 MB/s
Poor: 39% Great: 100%
SAMSUNG HD501LJ 500GB 10 User benchmarks, average bench 25% 199GB free, PID 0567 Operating at USB 3.0 Speed Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete		Read 70.2 Write 63.3 Mixed 48.6 76% 60.7 MB/s	4K Read 0.6 4K Write 1.2 4K Mixed 0.9 74% 0.9 MB/s
Poor: 9% Great: 33%
ST350041 8AS 500GB 34 User benchmarks, average bench 33% 466GB free, PID 0567 Operating at USB 3.0 Speed Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete		Read 118 Write 119 Mixed 60.2 122% 99.2 MB/s	4K Read 0.7 4K Write 1.8 4K Mixed 1.1 101% 1.2 MB/s
Poor: 18% Great: 51%
ST332082 0AS 320GB 10 User benchmarks, average bench 19% 298GB free, PID 0567 Operating at USB 3.0 Speed Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete		Read 84.9 Write 41.4 Mixed 42.8 64% 56.4 MB/s	4K Read 0.8 4K Write 1.1 4K Mixed 0.8 68% 0.9 MB/s
Poor: 11% Great: 28%
Hitachi HDS5C3020ALA632 2TB 24 User benchmarks, average bench 29% 2TB free, PID 0567 Operating at USB 3.0 Speed Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete		Read 100 Write 86.8 Mixed 56.9 99% 81.4 MB/s	4K Read 0.6 4K Write 0.7 4K Mixed 0.4 40% 0.57 MB/s
Poor: 11% Great: 50%
ST3000DM 001-1E6166 3TB 12 User benchmarks, average bench 53% 2.5TB free, PID 0567 Operating at USB 3.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 4 2.9 2.2 1.7 0.7 0.5 MB/s Performing way below expectations (17^th percentile)	34.6% Below average	Read 91.1 Write 125 Mixed 54.7 SusWrite 2 88% 68.2 MB/s	4K Read 0.4 4K Write 6.8 4K Mixed 1 267% 2.73 MB/s
Poor: 35% ↑ This bench: 34.6% Great: 74%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown - [0x9B85] CT16G4DFD824A.M16FD 2x16GB 13 User benchmarks, average bench 74% 2 of 4 slots used 32GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2400 MHz Performing way below expectations (19^th percentile)	69.3% Good	MC Read 25.8 MC Write 27.4 MC Mixed 22.6 72% 25.3 GB/s	SC Read 14.3 SC Write 26.3 SC Mixed 17 55% 19.2 GB/s	Latency 92.9 43% 92.9 ns
Poor: 69% ↑ This bench: 69.3% Great: 78%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $254	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $163	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $31	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $37	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16

User System

Performance Results

PC Performing below expectations (32nd percentile)

System Memory Latency Ladder

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

Feedback

PC Performing below expectations (32^nd percentile)