Today's hottest deals

Gigabyte GA-B85M-D3H

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 26%
Raft
Desktop
Desktop 64%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 21%
Surfboard
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (44th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 56 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 52.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics48.1% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (73%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
2 years ago, 24 months ago.
MotherboardGigabyte GA-B85M-D3H  (all builds)
Memory9.2 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors,
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20150820
Uptime2.7 Days
Run DateNov 18 '22 at 23:55
Run Duration167 Seconds
Run User AUS-User
Background CPU 73%

 PC Performing as expected (44th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-4690K-$43
SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.5 GHz, turbo 3.7 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (6th percentile)
52.6% Above average
Memory 70.2
1-Core 91.1
2-Core 167
63% 109 Pts
4-Core 196
8-Core 249
28% 222 Pts
64-Core 301
19% 301 Pts
Poor: 53%
This bench: 52.6%
Great: 82%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD R9 290-$399
Gigabyte(1458 228F) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1040 MHz, MLim: 1250 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 20.10.35.02
Performing above expectations (81st percentile)
48.1% Average
Lighting 62.3
Reflection 69.4
Parallax 84.2
51% 72 fps
MRender 60.7
Gravity 57
Splatting 43.4
43% 53.7 fps
Poor: 41%
This bench: 48.1%
Great: 50%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 850 Evo 250GB-$100
6GB free (System drive)
Firmware: EMT01B6Q
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 396
Write 378
Mixed 317
81% 364 MB/s
4K Read 29.1
4K Write 61.6
4K Mixed 38.5
126% 43.1 MB/s
DQ Read 378
DQ Write 335
DQ Mixed 355
266% 356 MB/s
Poor: 72% Great: 124%
WD Blue 160GB (2007)-$55
13GB free
Firmware: 05.06H05
SusWrite @10s intervals: 69 70 71 70 71 70 MB/s
Performing as expected (40th percentile)
36.5% Below average
Read 56.9
Write 57.2
Mixed 44.5
SusWrite 70.1
42% 57.2 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 1.8
4K Mixed 0.8
143% 1.03 MB/s
Poor: 18%
This bench: 36.5%
Great: 59%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.12 1TB-$60
380GB free
Firmware: JC45
SusWrite @10s intervals: 76 77 79 78 79 77 MB/s
Performing below expectations (22nd percentile)
45.9% Average
Read 82.2
Write 76.5
Mixed 57.2
SusWrite 77.7
54% 73.4 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.4
4K Mixed 0.8
144% 0.97 MB/s
Poor: 34%
This bench: 45.9%
Great: 68%
Seagate FireCuda SSHD 2TB (2016)-$66
15GB free
Firmware: CC41
SusWrite @10s intervals: 137 139 140 139 139 140 MB/s
Performing below expectations (39th percentile)
80.5% Excellent
Read 140
Write 160
Mixed 32
SusWrite 139
85% 118 MB/s
4K Read 1.1
4K Write 5.2
4K Mixed 1.8
342% 2.7 MB/s
Poor: 53%
This bench: 80.5%
Great: 110%
Seagate Barracuda 3TB (2017)-$65
2TB free
Firmware: 0001
SusWrite @10s intervals: 147 154 155 153 158 153 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (87th percentile)
79% Very good
Read 122
Write 132
Mixed 56
SusWrite 154
84% 116 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 0.5
4K Mixed 0
43% 0.43 MB/s
Poor: 39%
This bench: 79%
Great: 85%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
G.SKILL RipjawsX DDR3 2133 C11 2x8GB
2 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz
Performing below expectations (31st percentile)
52.1% Above average
MC Read 19.2
MC Write 21.2
MC Mixed 16.7
54% 19 GB/s
SC Read 11.3
SC Write 15.6
SC Mixed 12.7
38% 13.2 GB/s
Latency 101
40% 101 ns
Poor: 32%
This bench: 52.1%
Great: 78%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical GA-B85M-D3H Builds (Compare 3,965 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 8%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 65%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 7%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-B85M-D3H - $40

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 77% - Very good Total price: $184
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $165Nvidia RTX 4060 $290WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $129
Intel Core i5-13600K $210Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $389WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $80
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $406
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback