ADD TO PC
BUILD

Asus VivoBook_ASUSLaptop X509JP_X509JP

Performance Results


Gaming 5% Tree trunk	Desktop 43% Speed boat	Workstation 5% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (28th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 72 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 33.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is poor.
Graphics	3.94% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	86.4% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory	12GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 12GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Windows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.

System	Asus VivoBook_ASUSLaptop X509JP_X509JP (all builds)
Motherboard	ASUSTeK X509JP
Memory	5.7 GB free of 12 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 11
BIOS Date	20210812
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Nov 15 '22 at 10:54
Run Duration	130 Seconds
Run User	BGD-User
Background CPU	8%

PC Performing below expectations (28^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i5-1035G1 53,170 User benchmarks, average bench 51% U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads Base clock 1.2 GHz, turbo 1.9 GHz (avg) Performing way below expectations (13^th percentile)	33.4% Below average	Memory 35.5 1-Core 106 2-Core 151 53% 97.5 Pts	4-Core 171 8-Core 233 26% 202 Pts	64-Core 225 14% 225 Pts
Poor: 28% ↑ This bench: 33.4% Great: 68%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Intel UHD G1 FAQ - How to force Optimus or Switchable discrete GPUs? Asus(1043 1BAF) 1GB Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 31.0.101.2114 Performing below expectations (21^st percentile)	3.94% Terrible	Lighting 6.8 Reflection 17.4 Parallax 8 6% 10.7 fps	MRender 0.3 Gravity 2.7 Splatting 0.3 1% 1.1 fps
Poor: 3% ↑ This bench: 3.94% Great: 7%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Transcend TS256GMTE112S 256GB 25 User benchmarks, average bench 156% 192GB free (System drive) Firmware: U0513A0L SusWrite @10s intervals: 768 654 169 140 110 120 MB/s Performing way below expectations (2^nd percentile)	86.4% Excellent	Read 577 Write 645 Mixed 621 SusWrite 327 122% 542 MB/s	4K Read 25.2 4K Write 76.6 4K Mixed 18.3 102% 40 MB/s	DQ Read 332 DQ Write 271 DQ Mixed 303 227% 302 MB/s
Poor: 96% ↑ This bench: 86.4% Great: 202%
Seagate ST1000LM035-1RK172 1TB 452,134 User benchmarks, average bench 47% 931GB free Firmware: 0001 SusWrite @10s intervals: 126 129 129 128 129 126 MB/s Performing way above expectations (90^th percentile)	67.9% Good	Read 109 Write 120 Mixed 66 SusWrite 128 78% 106 MB/s	4K Read 1.2 4K Write 1.1 4K Mixed 0.8 159% 1.03 MB/s
Poor: 15% ↑ This bench: 67.9% Great: 71%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Samsung M471A5244CB0-CTD Kingston KMKYF9-MID 12GB 11 User benchmarks, average bench 49% 2667, 2400 MHz 4096, 8192 MB Performing way below expectations (13^th percentile)	28.3% Poor	MC Read 10.4 MC Write 12.3 MC Mixed 9.5 31% 10.7 GB/s	SC Read 4.7 SC Write 8.1 SC Mixed 4.7 17% 5.83 GB/s	Latency 225 18% 225 ns
Poor: 28% ↑ This bench: 28.3% Great: 69%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Typical VivoBook_ASUSLaptop X509JP_X509JP Builds (Compare 143 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming

Gaming 9%

Tree trunk

Desktop

Desktop 55%

Gunboat

Workstation

Workstation 9%

Tree trunk

System: Asus VivoBook_ASUSLaptop X509JP_X509JP

CPU
Core i5-1035G1IntelBench 51%, 53,170 samples	116x
Core i7-1065G7IntelBench 53%, 58,314 samples	27x

GPU
UHD G1IntelBench 5%, 68,603 samples	80x
GeForce MX330NvidiaBench 14%, 4,518 samples	45x
Iris Plus G7IntelBench 9%, 52,498 samples	18x

SSD
PC SN520 SDAPNUW-512G-1202 512GBWDCBench 155%, 2,132 samples	31x
WDC PC SN520 SDA 512GBNvmeBench 169%, 2,949 samples	23x
HFM256GDJTNG-8310A 256GBBench 121%, 26,870 samples	14x

RAM
M471A5244CB0-CTD Hynix HMA851S6JJR6N-VK 8GBSamsungBench 58%, 6,259 samples	32x
M471A5244CB0-CTD 2x4GBSamsungBench 60%, 54,777 samples	29x
M471A5244CB0-CTD 1x4GBSamsungBench 30%, 48,985 samples	14x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

The Best.

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $269	Nvidia RTX 4060 $295	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $177	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16

If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission

Today's hottest

Amazon Ebay

deals

CPU GPU SSD HDD USB RAM MBD

Build

Test

EFps

Can You Run It?

►
YouTube
*NEW*

About • User Guide • FAQs • Email • Privacy • Developer • YouTube Feedback