Today's hottest deals

Acer Aspire TC-220

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 3%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 43%
Speed boat
Workstation
Workstation 3%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (64th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 36 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 45%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics6.25% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory14GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 14GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (83%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemAcer Aspire TC-220  (all builds)
MotherboardAcer Aspire TC-220
Memory10.2 GB free of 14 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1366 x 768 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20160426
Uptime0.2 Days
Run DateNov 01 '17 at 16:10
Run Duration149 Seconds
Run User CAN-User
Background CPU 83%

 PC Performing above expectations (64th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD A10-7800 APU (2014 D.Ka)
P0, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.5 GHz, turbo 3.65 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (76th percentile)
45% Average
Memory 60.3
1-Core 53.2
2-Core 101
44% 71.5 Pts
4-Core 173
8-Core 173
23% 173 Pts
64-Core 177
11% 177 Pts
Poor: 26%
This bench: 45%
Great: 50%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD Radeon R7 Graphics
Acer(1025 0904) 1GB
Ram: 1GB, Driver: 17.7
Performing as expected (57th percentile)
6.25% Terrible
Lighting 7.8
Reflection 7.38
Parallax 11.5
6% 8.88 fps
MRender 5.57
Gravity 8.7
Splatting 7.65
6% 7.31 fps
Poor: 4%
This bench: 6.25%
Great: 8%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 1TB-$30
900GB free (System drive)
Firmware: CC43 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing as expected (60th percentile)
95.7% Outstanding
Read 189
Write 145
Mixed 144
120% 159 MB/s
4K Read 0.94
4K Write 1.54
4K Mixed 0.32
104% 0.94 MB/s
Poor: 55%
This bench: 95.7%
Great: 112%
TRUSTED Mass Storage 17.5TB
15.5TB free, PID null
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
12.7% Very poor
Read 21.3
Write 22.1
Mixed 20.2
27% 21.2 MB/s
4K Read 0.41
4K Write 1.53
4K Mixed 0.04
55% 0.66 MB/s
Poor: 13%
This bench: 12.7%
Great: 14%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston 99U5471-011.A01LF 99U5471-011.A01LF 99U5471-011.A01LF ACR16D3LU1KNG/8G 14GB
1333, 1333, 1333, 1600 MHz
2048, 2048, 2048, 8192 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
28.2% Poor
MC Read 12
MC Write 7.2
MC Mixed 11
29% 10.1 GB/s
SC Read 6.1
SC Write 5.5
SC Mixed 8
19% 6.53 GB/s
Latency 127
32% 127 ns

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Aspire TC-220 Builds (Compare 85 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 6%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 45%
Speed boat
Workstation
Workstation 5%
Tree trunk

System: Acer Aspire TC-220

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 28% - Poor Total price: $77
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $210Nvidia RTX 4060 $290WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $130
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $389WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $164Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $389
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback