Average Bench: 49.7% (826th of 1468)

Based on 12,547 user benchmarks.  Device: 178BFBFF00610F31 Model: AMD A10-6700 APU with Radeon(tm) HD Graphics

The AMD A10-6700 is a quad-core Richland APU (CPU+GPU) based on second generation Bulldozer micro-architecture (code named Piledriver) launched in Q3 of 2013. The A10-6700 is the power efficient (TDP of 65 Watts) version of the A10-6800K (TDP of 100 Watts) and is only slightly slower, scoring an effective speed of 68 versus the A10-6800K’s 73. Its base clock speed is 3.7 GHz which automatically turbo boosts to 4.3 GHz when needed and is sufficient for most generic desktop applications. The integrated HD 8670 Graphics are comparable to Intel's recent HD offerings. The A10-6700 offers reasonable performance at a reasonable price point. But comparing the A10-6700 and i3-4360 shows that the comparably priced 4360 wins hands down on nearly every metric, and is therefore a better alternative. [Dec '14 CPUPro]

Poor: 35%Average: 49.7% Great: 59%
Gaming
Gaming 50%
Yacht
Desktop
Desktop 55%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 36%
Jet ski

Below average average bench

The AMD A10-6700 APU (2013 D.Ri) averaged 50.2% lower than the peak scores attained by the group leaders. This isn't a great result which indicates that there are much faster alternatives on the comparison list.

Strengths

Avg. Memory Latency 67.9Pts
Avg. Single Core Speed 66.1Pts

Good consistency

The range of scores (95th - 5th percentile) for the AMD A10-6700 APU (2013 D.Ri) is 23.9%. This is a relatively narrow range which indicates that the AMD A10-6700 APU (2013 D.Ri) performs reasonably consistently under varying real world conditions.

Weaknesses

Avg. Multi Core Speed 187Pts
Avg. Octa Core Speed 187Pts

Average Bench

(Based on 12,547 samples)
Min Avg Max
47.4 Memory 67.9 82.3
45 1-Core 66.1 75.4
80.7 2-Core 119 140
51.1% 84.3 Pts
Min Avg Max
113 4-Core 184 216
125 8-Core 187 216
24.8% 186 Pts
Min Avg Max
124 64-Core 187 216
11.6% 187 Pts
User Benchmarks BenchNormalHeavyServer
The fastest CPU (mainstream) averages a speed of 100%
P0, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.7 GHz, turbo 4.1 GHz (avg)
Memory 79.3
1-Core 68.9
2-Core 131
57% 93.1 Pts
4-Core 200
8-Core 194
26% 197 Pts
64-Core 196
12% 196 Pts
FM2 , 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.7 GHz, turbo 4.1 GHz (avg)
Memory 77.5
1-Core 71.7
2-Core 132
57% 93.8 Pts
4-Core 206
8-Core 202
28% 204 Pts
64-Core 197
12% 197 Pts
FM2 , 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.7 GHz, turbo 4.1 GHz (avg)
Memory 64.7
1-Core 70.6
2-Core 123
52% 86 Pts
4-Core 196
8-Core 194
26% 194 Pts
64-Core 175
11% 175 Pts
FM2 , 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.7 GHz, turbo 4.15 GHz (avg)
Memory 62.8
1-Core 69.7
2-Core 125
51% 85.8 Pts
4-Core 195
8-Core 196
26% 195 Pts
64-Core 194
12% 194 Pts
FM2 , 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.7 GHz, turbo 4.15 GHz (avg)
Memory 63.1
1-Core 54.3
2-Core 106
45% 74.4 Pts
4-Core 143
8-Core 155
20% 149 Pts
64-Core 157
10% 157 Pts
12,547 MORE »

 Market Share (See Leaders)

The number of benchmark samples for this model as a percentage of all 68,991,956 CPUs tested

Typical A10-6700 APU (2013 D.Ri) Builds (Compare 244 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 7%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 51%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 6%
Tree trunk

System: Asus M11BB

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 55% - Above average Total price: $155

Popular A10-6700 APU (2013 D.Ri) systems:

How Fast Is Your CPU? (Bench your build) Size up your PC in less than a minute

Welcome to our PC speed test tool. UserBenchmark will test your PC and compare the results to other users with the same components. You can quickly size up your PC, identify hardware problems and explore the best value for money upgrades.

UserBenchmark of the month

How it works

  • - Download and run UserBenchmark
  • - CPU tests include: integer, floating and string
  • - GPU tests include: six 3D game simulations
  • - Drive tests include: read, write, sustained write and mixed IO
  • - RAM tests include: single/multi core bandwidth and latency
  • - SkillBench (space shooter) tests user input accuracy
  • - Reports are generated and presented on userbenchmark.com
  • - Identify the strongest components in your PC
  • - See speed test results from other users
  • - Compare your components to the current market leaders
  • - Explore your best upgrade options with a virtual PC build
  • - Compare your in-game FPS to other users with your hardware
Processor Rankings (Price vs Performance) November 2024 CPU Rankings

We calculate effective speed which measures real world performance for typical users. Effective speed is adjusted by current prices to yield a value for money rating. Our calculated values are checked against thousands of individual user ratings. The customizable table below combines these factors to bring you the definitive list of top CPUs. [CPUPro]

Group Test Results

  • Best user rated - User sentiment trumps benchmarks for this comparison.
  • Best value for money - Value for money is based on real world performance.
  • Fastest real world speed - Real World Speed measures performance for typical consumers.

 Comments

AMD A10-Series APU with HD 8670D Graphics...

Added 9 years ago.

Excellent

3 years ago.

Actually well balanced back then.


Good

3 years ago.

Un bon processeur de Gaming pas trop chers


Excellent

3 years ago.

Its bad CPU for its price, it should cost about 40€


Poor

9 years ago.


Very good

8 years ago.

It will serve your desktop needs perfectly!


Your
opinion?
1468 Processors (Compared) Thousands of user benchmarks compiled into one comparison list

See how consistently different CPUs perform with varying real world conditions. The charts also illustrate overall performance, popularity and rank.

 Frequently Asked Questions

 Best User Rated

Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $159Nvidia RTX 4060 $295WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-13600K $210Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $380WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $82
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $370
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback