Performance Results


Gaming 3% Tree trunk	Desktop 17% Surfboard	Workstation 3% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing way below expectations (10th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 90 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With an extremely low single core score, this CPU can barely handle email and light web browsing. Finally, with a gaming score of 14.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is terrible.
Graphics	2.17% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	29.4% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory	12GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 12GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Very high background CPU (56%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

PC Performing way below expectations (10^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i7-8550U 184,356 User benchmarks, average bench 53% U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads Base clock 2 GHz, turbo 0.4 GHz (avg) Performing way below expectations (1^st percentile)	14.3% Very poor	Memory 21.9 1-Core 12.8 2-Core 22.3 13% 19 Pts	4-Core 37 8-Core 51 6% 44 Pts	64-Core 47 3% 47 Pts
Poor: 26% ↑ This bench: 14.3% Great: 71%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Intel UHD Graphics 620 (Mobile Kaby Lake R) FAQ - How to force Optimus or Switchable discrete GPUs? Legend(17AA 3973) 1GB Ram: 2GB, Driver: 17.1.1 Performing way below expectations (0^th percentile)	2.17% Terrible	Lighting 2.3 Reflection 10.2 Parallax 2.2 2% 4.9 fps	MRender 3.7 Gravity 2.6 Splatting 3.7 3% 3.33 fps
Poor: 3% ↑ This bench: 2.17% Great: 6%

Drive	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Teclast 240GB A800 240GB 189 User benchmarks, average bench 55% 168GB free (System drive) Firmware: H190308 SusWrite @10s intervals: 29 24 26 29 28 29 MB/s Performing way below expectations (6^th percentile)	29.4% Poor	Read 467 Write 29.1 Mixed 39.2 SusWrite 27.5 30% 141 MB/s	4K Read 11.6 4K Write 6.4 4K Mixed 7 30% 8.33 MB/s
Poor: 29% ↑ This bench: 29.4% Great: 89%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Samsung M471A5244CB0-CRC 8BA1 Ronisys NB 8G 2400 12GB 6 User benchmarks, average bench 23% 2400, 2400 MHz 4096, 8192 MB Performing below expectations (33^rd percentile)	18.5% Very poor	MC Read 6.4 MC Write 7.2 MC Mixed 7.8 20% 7.13 GB/s	SC Read 2.1 SC Write 3.9 SC Mixed 3.4 9% 3.13 GB/s	Latency 307 13% 307 ns
Poor: 18% ↑ This bench: 18.5% Great: 29%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 7%

Tree trunk

Desktop 58%

Gunboat

Workstation 7%

Tree trunk

CPU
Core i7-8550UIntelBench 53%, 184,356 samples	17x

GPU
UHD Graphics 620 (Mobile Kaby Lake R)IntelBench 5%, 420,154 samples	15x
Radeon R7 M440AMDBench 7%, 899 samples	1x
Radeon 530AMDBench 7%, 3,164 samples	1x

RAM
M471A5244CB0-CRC 8BA1 Ronisys NB 8G 2400 12GBSamsungBench 23%, 6 samples	4x
M471A5244CB0-CRC Hynix HMA851S6AFR6N-UH 8GBSamsungBench 60%, 4,290 samples	3x
M471A5244CB0-CRC 2x4GBSamsungBench 57%, 36,396 samples	2x