Lenovo 81CM

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 4%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 19%
Surfboard
Workstation
Workstation 4%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing way below expectations (5th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 95 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith an extremely low single core score, this CPU can barely handle email and light web browsing. Finally, with a gaming score of 13%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is terrible.
Graphics1.66% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive61.5% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory12GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 12GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (42%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
20 months ago, 20 months ago.
SystemLenovo 81CM  (all builds)
MotherboardLENOVO LNVNB161216
Memory8 GB free of 12 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors,
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20200604
Uptime0 Days
Run DateOct 23 '22 at 10:31
Run Duration168 Seconds
Run User DNK-User
Background CPU 42%

 PC Performing way below expectations (5th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-8550U
U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 2 GHz, turbo 0.4 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (1st percentile)
13% Very poor
Memory 19.4
1-Core 42.7
2-Core 20
18% 27.4 Pts
4-Core 36.8
8-Core 49.2
5% 43 Pts
64-Core 50.7
3% 50.7 Pts
Poor: 26%
This bench: 13%
Great: 71%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel UHD Graphics 620 (Mobile Kaby Lake R)
Legend(17AA 3973) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 26.20.100.7812
Performing way below expectations (0th percentile)
1.66% Terrible
Lighting 1.8
Reflection 10.1
Parallax 2.2
2% 4.7 fps
MRender 2.7
Gravity 1.9
Splatting 2.8
2% 2.47 fps
Poor: 3%
This bench: 1.66%
Great: 6%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 970 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 250GB-$104
166GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 2B2QEXM7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 501 575 480 393 392 389 MB/s
Relative performance (0th percentile)
61.5% Good
Read 544
Write 533
Mixed 437
SusWrite 455
111% 492 MB/s
4K Read 8.7
4K Write 11.1
4K Mixed 9.9
32% 9.9 MB/s
DQ Read 52.2
DQ Write 41.8
DQ Mixed 46
35% 46.7 MB/s
Poor: 160%
This bench: 61.5%
Great: 280%
Teclast 240GB A800 240GB
190GB free
Firmware: H190308
SusWrite @10s intervals: 210 74 29 27 20 27 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (4th percentile)
26.9% Poor
Read 289
Write 201
Mixed 237
SusWrite 64.5
44% 198 MB/s
4K Read 8.5
4K Write 9.9
4K Mixed 8
28% 8.8 MB/s
DQ Read 63.8
DQ Write 52.8
DQ Mixed 57.2
43% 57.9 MB/s
Poor: 29%
This bench: 26.9%
Great: 89%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M471A5244CB0-CRC 8BA1 Ronisys NB 8G 2400 12GB
2400, 2400 MHz
4096, 8192 MB
Performing way below expectations (16th percentile)
18.4% Very poor
MC Read 7.2
MC Write 8.1
MC Mixed 6.1
20% 7.13 GB/s
SC Read 2.2
SC Write 3.6
SC Mixed 3.1
8% 2.97 GB/s
Latency 325
12% 325 ns
Poor: 18%
This bench: 18.4%
Great: 29%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical 81CM Builds (Compare 17 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 7%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 58%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 7%
Tree trunk

System: Lenovo 81CM

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $160Nvidia RTX 4060 $290WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $160
Intel Core i5-13600K $249Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $79
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $363
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback