Today's hottest deals

Asus UX410UAR

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 4%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 34%
Sail boat
Workstation
Workstation 4%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (32nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 68 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a relatively low single core score, this CPU can handle email, light web browsing and basic audio/video playback, but it will struggle to handle CPU intensive tasks. Finally, with a gaming score of 26.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very poor.
Graphics4.54% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive46.3% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
Very high background CPU (54%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemAsus UX410UAR  (all builds)
MotherboardASUSTeK UX410UAR
Memory3.9 GB free of 8 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20190416
Uptime0.3 Days
Run DateNov 26 '22 at 10:36
Run Duration135 Seconds
Run User MLT-User
Background CPU 54%

 PC Performing below expectations (32nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-8550U
U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 2 GHz, turbo 2 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (5th percentile)
26.3% Poor
Memory 28.6
1-Core 69.8
2-Core 139
41% 79.2 Pts
4-Core 129
8-Core 302
25% 215 Pts
64-Core 272
17% 272 Pts
Poor: 26%
This bench: 26.3%
Great: 71%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel UHD Graphics 620 (Mobile Kaby Lake R)
Asus(1043 15A0) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 27.20.100.8682
Performing above expectations (69th percentile)
4.54% Terrible
Lighting 5.4
Reflection 3.6
Parallax 4.4
4% 4.47 fps
MRender 4.5
Gravity 5.7
Splatting 6.9
5% 5.7 fps
Poor: 3%
This bench: 4.54%
Great: 6%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
HFS256G39TND-N210A 256GB
162GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 30200P10
SusWrite @10s intervals: 206 159 140 178 204 184 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (1st percentile)
46.3% Average
Read 305
Write 234
Mixed 186
SusWrite 178
50% 226 MB/s
4K Read 11.3
4K Write 23.2
4K Mixed 12.1
45% 15.5 MB/s
DQ Read 225
DQ Write 202
DQ Mixed 158
134% 195 MB/s
Poor: 54%
This bench: 46.3%
Great: 83%
WD Elements 25A2 1TB
738GB free, PID 25a2
Operating at USB 3.2 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 96 12 99 89 94 75 MB/s
Performing above expectations (73rd percentile)
45% Average
Read 104
Write 104
Mixed 58.8
SusWrite 77.5
114% 86 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 4.2
4K Mixed 0.3
155% 1.67 MB/s
Poor: 14%
This bench: 45%
Great: 63%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Micron 8ATF1G64HZ-2G6H1 1x8GB
1 of 4 slots used
8GB SODIMM DDR4 2667 MHz clocked @ 2400 MHz
Performing below potential (10th percentile) - Ensure that the top XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
25.7% Poor
MC Read 11.5
MC Write 8.9
MC Mixed 9.7
29% 10 GB/s
SC Read 2.3
SC Write 5.6
SC Mixed 4.3
12% 4.07 GB/s
Latency 263
15% 263 ns
Poor: 22%
This bench: 25.7%
Great: 42%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical UX410UAR Builds (Compare 138 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 7%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 53%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 6%
Tree trunk

System: Asus UX410UAR

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $210Nvidia RTX 4060 $285WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $125
Intel Core i5-12600K $160Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $389WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $80
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $330
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback