Today's hottest deals

Asus M2N-SLI DELUXE

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 5%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 30%
Sail boat
Workstation
Workstation 4%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (38th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 62 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith an extremely low single core score, this CPU can barely handle email and light web browsing. Finally, with a gaming score of 24.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very poor.
Graphics6.75% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive11.1% is an extremely low SSD score, this system will benefit from a faster SSD.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (100%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
MotherboardAsus M2N-SLI DELUXE  (all builds)
Memory4 GB free of 8 GB @ 0.8 GHz
DisplayЦвета: 1680 x 1050 - 32 Bit
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20080307
Uptime0 Days
Run DateOct 22 '22 at 03:57
Run Duration175 Seconds
Run User RUS-User
Background CPU 100%

 PC Performing below expectations (38th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Athlon 64 X2 Dual Core 5600+
Socket AM2 , 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads
Base clock 2.9 GHz, turbo 2.9 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (5th percentile)
24.7% Poor
Memory 41.4
1-Core 34.5
2-Core 43.3
26% 39.7 Pts
4-Core 49.1
8-Core 42.2
6% 45.7 Pts
64-Core 39.1
2% 39.1 Pts
Poor: 25%
This bench: 24.7%
Great: 47%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GeForce GT 730
Gigabyte(1458 36B8) 1GB
CLim: 1006 MHz, MLim: 1252 MHz, Ram: 1GB, Driver: 472.98
Performing way above expectations (93rd percentile)
6.75% Terrible
Lighting 8.3
Reflection 8.8
Parallax 9.4
7% 8.83 fps
MRender 10.3
Gravity 8
Splatting 7
7% 8.43 fps
Poor: 3%
This bench: 6.75%
Great: 7%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
128gb SS D 128GB
63GB free (System drive)
Firmware: H190
SusWrite @10s intervals: 48 33 27 27 28 30 MB/s
Relative performance (0th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
11.1% Very poor
Read 84.7
Write 63.9
Mixed 71.6
SusWrite 32.1
14% 63.1 MB/s
4K Read 5.1
4K Write 7.9
4K Mixed 5.2
19% 6.07 MB/s
Poor: 39%
This bench: 11.1%
Great: 79%
WD Blue 320GB (2008)-$57
171GB free
Firmware: 01.0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 73 78 75 73 80 88 MB/s
Performing below expectations (31st percentile)
38.7% Below average
Read 56.6
Write 58.8
Mixed 53.1
SusWrite 78
46% 61.6 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 1.7
4K Mixed 0.8
145% 1.03 MB/s
Poor: 23%
This bench: 38.7%
Great: 60%
Samsung HD321KJ 320GB-$42
596GB free
Firmware: CP10
SusWrite @10s intervals: 65 69 65 63 70 73 MB/s
Performing as expected (55th percentile)
34.2% Below average
Read 51.7
Write 58.4
Mixed 45.2
SusWrite 67.4
41% 55.7 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 1.2
4K Mixed 0.7
121% 0.8 MB/s
Poor: 21%
This bench: 34.2%
Great: 43%
Toshiba MQ01ABF050 500GB-$32
356GB free
Firmware: AM0B
SusWrite @10s intervals: 58 65 68 68 71 88 MB/s
Performing below expectations (39th percentile)
39.9% Below average
Read 69.3
Write 69.3
Mixed 31.9
SusWrite 69.7
44% 60 MB/s
4K Read 0.4
4K Write 1.6
4K Mixed 0.5
102% 0.83 MB/s
Poor: 21%
This bench: 39.9%
Great: 60%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 4x2GB
4 of 4 slots used
8GB DIMM DDR
Performing way below expectations (4th percentile)
12.4% Very poor
MC Read 3.8
MC Write 4.1
MC Mixed 4.3
12% 4.07 GB/s
SC Read 2.5
SC Write 4
SC Mixed 4
10% 3.5 GB/s
Latency 196
20% 196 ns
Poor: 14%
This bench: 12.4%
Great: 45%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical M2N-SLI DELUXE Builds (Compare 38 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 2%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 43%
Speed boat
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: Asus M2N-SLI DELUXE

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $169Nvidia RTX 4060 $295WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $345WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $225Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $340
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback