Today's hottest deals

Asus Rampage II Extreme

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 40%
Jet ski
Desktop
Desktop 83%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 34%
Sail boat
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (52nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 48 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 82.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics46% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive44% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
MotherboardAsus Rampage II Extreme  (all builds)
Memory11.6 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.1 GHz
Display2560 x 1080 - 32 Bit kolorów
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20110919
Uptime0.6 Days
Run DateOct 15 '22 at 08:36
Run Duration125 Seconds
Run User POL-User
Background CPU1%

 PC Performing as expected (52nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Xeon X5650
LGA1366, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 2.65 GHz, turbo 2.9 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (96th percentile)
82.4% Excellent
Memory 94.9
1-Core 100
2-Core 202
77% 132 Pts
4-Core 378
8-Core 565
59% 471 Pts
64-Core 716
44% 716 Pts
Poor: 60%
This bench: 82.4%
Great: 82%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD R9 290-$399
AMD(1002 0B00) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 947 MHz, MLim: 1250 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 20.10.35.02
Performing below potential (51st percentile) - GPU OC Guide
46% Average
Lighting 59.6
Reflection 67.9
Parallax 81.1
49% 69.5 fps
MRender 58.4
Gravity 54.4
Splatting 41
41% 51.3 fps
Poor: 41%
This bench: 46%
Great: 50%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
P3-128 128GB
29GB free (System drive)
Firmware: T161118b
SusWrite @10s intervals: 158 159 164 156 120 85 MB/s
Performing below potential (16th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
44% Average
Read 184
Write 229
Mixed 189
SusWrite 140
42% 186 MB/s
4K Read 21.9
4K Write 51.9
4K Mixed 19.4
86% 31.1 MB/s
DQ Read 18.2
DQ Write 87.2
DQ Mixed 20.8
25% 42.1 MB/s
Poor: 34%
This bench: 44%
Great: 96%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 500GB-$18
116GB free
Firmware: KC44
SusWrite @10s intervals: 100 98 101 101 101 99 MB/s
Performing as expected (41st percentile)
55.4% Above average
Read 93.3
Write 95.3
Mixed 49.9
SusWrite 99.9
62% 84.6 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 0.9
4K Mixed 0.7
124% 0.77 MB/s
Poor: 27%
This bench: 55.4%
Great: 88%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 4x4GB
4 of 6 slots used
16GB DIMM
Performing as expected (56th percentile)
44% Average
MC Read 16.9
MC Write 14.6
MC Mixed 12.5
42% 14.7 GB/s
SC Read 13.1
SC Write 10.3
SC Mixed 12.8
34% 12.1 GB/s
Latency 57.2
70% 57.2 ns
Poor: 23%
This bench: 44%
Great: 61%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Rampage II Extreme Builds (Compare 546 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 51%
Yacht
Desktop
Desktop 70%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 39%
Jet ski

Motherboard: Asus Rampage II Extreme

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 64% - Good Total price: $453
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $169Nvidia RTX 4060 $295WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $345WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $225Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback