Today's hottest deals

Asus TUF Gaming FX505GT_FX505GT

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 8%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 63%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 8%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (32nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 68 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 64.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics5.8% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive92% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
Run History
2 years ago, 2 years ago.
SystemAsus TUF Gaming FX505GT_FX505GT  (all builds)
MotherboardASUSTeK FX505GT
Memory8 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors,
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20201126
Uptime2 Days
Run DateOct 13 '22 at 14:31
Run Duration126 Seconds
Run User MAR-User
Background CPU2%

 PC Performing below expectations (32nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-9300H
U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 2.4 GHz, turbo 3.65 GHz (avg)
Performing below expectations (35th percentile)
64.4% Good
Memory 73.3
1-Core 99
2-Core 174
67% 115 Pts
4-Core 300
8-Core 436
46% 368 Pts
64-Core 454
28% 454 Pts
Poor: 44%
This bench: 64.4%
Great: 82%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel UHD Graphics 630
Asus(1043 1AB1) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 27.20.100.9168
Performing above expectations (83rd percentile)
5.8% Terrible
Lighting 6.2
Reflection 60
Parallax 7.1
5% 24.4 fps
MRender 8.9
Gravity 6.5
Splatting 10.5
7% 8.63 fps
Poor: 4%
This bench: 5.8%
Great: 6%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Nvme Micron_2200V_MTFDHBA512TCK 512GB
51GB free (System drive)
Firmware: P1MA0V4 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 785 685 425 420 334 258 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (6th percentile)
92% Outstanding
Read 751
Write 608
Mixed 440
SusWrite 484
128% 571 MB/s
4K Read 3
4K Write 22.4
4K Mixed 23.2
46% 16.2 MB/s
DQ Read 398
DQ Write 350
DQ Mixed 372
279% 373 MB/s
Poor: 92%
This bench: 92%
Great: 188%
WD WD10SPSX-60A6WT0 1TB
221GB free
Firmware: 01.01A01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 97 95 95 94 95 93 MB/s
Performing below expectations (34th percentile)
60.8% Good
Read 116
Write 107
Mixed 58.4
SusWrite 94.7
69% 94.1 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 4.3
4K Mixed 0.3
134% 1.7 MB/s
Poor: 43%
This bench: 60.8%
Great: 83%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Crucial CT8G4SFS8266.C8FD1 2x8GB
2 of 4 slots used
16GB SODIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2667 MHz
Performing below potential (2nd percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
41.8% Average
MC Read 15.2
MC Write 16.6
MC Mixed 12.3
42% 14.7 GB/s
SC Read 9.8
SC Write 13.6
SC Mixed 11.4
33% 11.6 GB/s
Latency 94.1
42% 94.1 ns
Poor: 55%
This bench: 41.8%
Great: 86%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical TUF Gaming FX505GT_FX505GT Builds (Compare 2,227 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 9%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 66%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 8%
Tree trunk

System: Asus TUF Gaming FX505GT_FX505GT

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $164Nvidia RTX 4060 $288WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $112Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $389WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $82
Intel Core i5-13600K $226Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $400
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback