Today's hottest deals

MSI X99A GAMING 7 (MS-7885)

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 113%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 94%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 106%
UFO
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (55th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 45 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 89.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics124% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive173% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory48GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 48GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
SystemMSI MS-7885
MotherboardMSI X99A GAMING 7 (MS-7885)  (all builds)
Memory44.2 GB free of 48 GB @ 3 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20190613
Uptime0 Days
Run DateOct 01 '22 at 23:47
Run Duration203 Seconds
Run User DEU-User
Background CPU0%

 PC Performing as expected (55th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-5930K-$599
SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 3.5 GHz, turbo 4.8 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (95th percentile)
89.8% Excellent
Memory 85.3
1-Core 137
2-Core 276
91% 166 Pts
4-Core 506
8-Core 852
83% 679 Pts
64-Core 1,079
67% 1,079 Pts
Poor: 70%
This bench: 89.8%
Great: 91%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1080-Ti-$237
CLim: 1923 MHz, MLim: 2752 MHz, Ram: 11GB, Driver: 516.94
Performing below potential (50th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
124% Outstanding
Lighting 167
Reflection 189
Parallax 174
136% 177 fps
MRender 136
Gravity 172
Splatting 126
117% 144 fps
Poor: 109%
This bench: 124%
Great: 133%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung SM951 AHCI PCIe M.2 256GB-$223
166GB free (System drive)
Firmware: BXW2500Q Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1021 1035 903 947 791 798 MB/s
Performing as expected (46th percentile)
173% Outstanding
Read 1,225
Write 1,097
Mixed 722
SusWrite 916
222% 990 MB/s
4K Read 33.1
4K Write 78
4K Mixed 45
149% 52 MB/s
DQ Read 601
DQ Write 358
DQ Mixed 426
332% 462 MB/s
Poor: 109%
This bench: 173%
Great: 220%
Samsung 840 250GB-$239
31GB free
Firmware: DXT08B0Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 242 228 149 101 83 48 MB/s
Performing below expectations (38th percentile)
65.2% Good
Read 416
Write 202
Mixed 158
SusWrite 142
51% 229 MB/s
4K Read 23.5
4K Write 52.2
4K Mixed 21.3
90% 32.3 MB/s
DQ Read 352
DQ Write 217
DQ Mixed 54.2
102% 208 MB/s
Poor: 51%
This bench: 65.2%
Great: 85%
Sandisk S128G 126GB
117GB free
Firmware: 3.2.0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 300 299 306 318 319 323 MB/s
Performing above expectations (80th percentile)
50.6% Above average
Read 408
Write 302
Mixed 84.8
SusWrite 311
62% 276 MB/s
4K Read 14.5
4K Write 16
4K Mixed 12.3
46% 14.3 MB/s
DQ Read 32.5
DQ Write 19.5
DQ Mixed 19
16% 23.7 MB/s
Poor: 29%
This bench: 50.6%
Great: 56%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 3TB-$45
2.5TB free
Firmware: SC48
SusWrite @10s intervals: 163 161 165 162 159 162 MB/s
Performing below expectations (37th percentile)
83.3% Excellent
Read 127
Write 139
Mixed 54.3
SusWrite 162
88% 120 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 7.1
4K Mixed 0.8
241% 2.8 MB/s
Poor: 56%
This bench: 83.3%
Great: 113%
WD WD3000GLFS-01F8U0 300GB
279GB free
Firmware: 03.03V01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 121 119 119 120 113 121 MB/s
Performing above expectations (67th percentile)
61.3% Good
Read 94.3
Write 121
Mixed 71.3
SusWrite 119
75% 101 MB/s
4K Read 0.9
4K Write 2.7
4K Mixed 1.2
221% 1.6 MB/s
Poor: 38%
This bench: 61.3%
Great: 68%
Seagate Barracuda 4TB (2017)-$75
3.5TB free
Firmware: 0001
SusWrite @10s intervals: 170 180 188 178 166 173 MB/s
Performing above expectations (71st percentile)
76.3% Very good
Read 89.1
Write 130
Mixed 65.9
SusWrite 176
84% 115 MB/s
4K Read 1.3
4K Write 4.8
4K Mixed 0.6
210% 2.23 MB/s
Poor: 40%
This bench: 76.3%
Great: 90%
WL600GSA32RA100B 600GB
547GB free
Firmware: 04.05G04
SusWrite @10s intervals: 61 61 61 62 60 62 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (7th percentile)
58.3% Above average
Read 142
Write 67.1
Mixed 74.2
SusWrite 61.3
64% 86.1 MB/s
4K Read 1.1
4K Write 1.4
4K Mixed 1.2
205% 1.23 MB/s
Poor: 58%
This bench: 58.3%
Great: 80%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown KHX3000C15D4/8GX KHX3000C15D4/8GX KHX3000C15D4/8GX KHX3000C15D4/8GX CMK16GX4M2B3000C15 CMK16GX4M2B3000C15 48GB
3000, 3000, 3000, 3000, 3000, 3000 MHz
8192, 8192, 8192, 8192, 8192, 8192 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
91.5% Outstanding
MC Read 38.6
MC Write 32.1
MC Mixed 32.1
98% 34.3 GB/s
SC Read 15.5
SC Write 25.5
SC Mixed 22.7
61% 21.2 GB/s
Latency 71.7
56% 71.7 ns

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical X99A GAMING 7 (MS-7885) Builds (Compare 734 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 78%
Battleship
Desktop
Desktop 80%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 69%
Battle cruiser

Motherboard: MSI X99A GAMING 7 (MS-7885)

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 95% - Outstanding Total price: $410
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $169Nvidia RTX 4060 $296WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $345WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $84
Intel Core i5-13600K $225Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback