PC Status | Overall this PC is performing below expectations (31st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 69 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas. |
Processor | With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 61.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average. |
Graphics | 30.1% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics) |
Memory | 16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing. |
OS Version | Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option. |
Motherboard | Gigabyte GA-970A-DS3P (all builds) |
Memory | 12 GB free of 16 GB @ 0.7 GHz |
Display | 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors |
OS | Windows 10 |
BIOS Date | 20160226 |
Uptime | 0 Days |
Run Date | Jul 28 '22 at 00:33 |
Run Duration | 267 Seconds |
Run User | CAN-User |
Background CPU | 11% |
Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).
Processor | Bench | Normal | Heavy | Server |
---|---|---|---|---|
61.2%
Good
|
||||
Graphics Card | Bench | 3D DX9 | 3D DX10 | 3D DX11 |
---|---|---|---|---|
AMD R9 280-$185
PowerColor(148C 3000) 3GB
CLim: 960 MHz, MLim: 1250 MHz, Ram: 3GB, Driver: 22.6.1
Performing below potential (67th percentile) - GPU OC Guide |
30.1%
Below average
|
|||
Drives | Bench | Sequential | Random 4k | Deep queue 4k |
---|---|---|---|---|
Seagate Barracuda 4TB (2017)-$85
1TB free (System drive)
Firmware: 0001
SusWrite @10s intervals: 109 90 86 58 82 133 MB/s
|
||||
WD Green 4TB (2013)-$90
48GB free
Firmware: 80.00A80
SusWrite @10s intervals: 37 42 45 48 45 51 MB/s
|
20%
Poor
|
|||
WD Green 1.5TB (2009)-$150
6GB free
Firmware: 01.00A01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 47 51 54 60 55 57 MB/s
|
31.3%
Below average
|
|||
WD Green 1TB (2010)-$139
49GB free
Firmware: 50.0AB50
SusWrite @10s intervals: 66 66 65 62 64 65 MB/s
|
38.2%
Below average
|
|||
Seagate Expansion Desk 3TB
9GB free
Firmware: 0909
SusWrite @10s intervals: 29 29 29 29 29 29 MB/s
|
17%
Very poor
|
|||
WD Elements 25A3 6TB
13GB free, PID 25a3
Operating at USB 3.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 143 102 104 104 94 102 MB/s
|
89.3%
Excellent
|
|||
Seagate Expansion 5TB
47GB free, PID 231a
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 61 61 62 60 64 57 MB/s
|
33.5%
Below average
|
|||
WD My Book 1140 2TB
2GB free, PID 1140
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 25 23 19 22 23 22 MB/s
|
10.3%
Very poor
|
|||
Memory Kit | Bench | Multi core | Single core | Latency |
---|---|---|---|---|
G.SKILL F3 DDR3 1866 C10 2x8GB
2 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 667 MHz
|
43.7%
Average
|
|||
L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds
|
|
|
CPU | |
---|---|
FX-8350AMD $85Bench 61%, 313,196 samples | 976x |
FX-6300AMD $90Bench 55%, 261,607 samples | 888x |
FX-8320AMD $95Bench 59%, 106,454 samples | 415x |
GPU | |
---|---|
GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples | 292x |
GTX 1060-6GBNvidia $117Bench 56%, 1,368,019 samples | 184x |
RX 580AMD $120Bench 52%, 360,351 samples | 172x |
EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER | Value: 87% - Excellent | Total price: $318 |