Today's hottest deals

MSI MS-17F3

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing way below expectations (8th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 92 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 44.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Boot Drive176% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory64GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 64GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (45%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU. CPU throttled at 99% by Windows. Ensure maximum processor state is set to 100% via Settings > System > Power & sleep > Additional power settings > Change plan settings > Change advanced power settings > Processor power management > Maximum processor state.
Run History
2 years ago, 2 years ago.
SystemMicro-Star Creator 17M A9SE
MotherboardMSI MS-17F3  (all builds)
Memory55.6 GB free of 64 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20200326
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateJul 27 '22 at 15:19
Run Duration133 Seconds
Run User FRA-User
Background CPU 45%
CPU Throttled 99%

 PC Performing way below expectations (8th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-9750H
U3E1, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 2.6 GHz, turbo 2.6 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (3rd percentile)
44.6% Average
Memory 51.8
1-Core 45.9
2-Core 144
44% 80.5 Pts
4-Core 202
8-Core 364
34% 283 Pts
64-Core 465
29% 465 Pts
Poor: 49%
This bench: 44.6%
Great: 87%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung PM981 NVMe PCIe M.2 1TB
744GB free (System drive)
Firmware: EXA7301Q Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1059 1144 1073 1091 1099 1078 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (14th percentile)
176% Outstanding
Read 1269
Write 880
Mixed 853
SusWrite 1,091
229% 1,023 MB/s
4K Read 21
4K Write 59.1
4K Mixed 29.4
101% 36.5 MB/s
DQ Read 824
DQ Write 434
DQ Mixed 532
421% 596 MB/s
Poor: 145%
This bench: 176%
Great: 329%
WDC WDS100T2B0A-00SM50 1TB
835GB free
Firmware: 401020WD
SusWrite @10s intervals: 314 366 368 365 360 361 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (10th percentile)
73.6% Very good
Read 304
Write 320
Mixed 268
SusWrite 356
70% 312 MB/s
4K Read 16.9
4K Write 50.6
4K Mixed 22.7
82% 30.1 MB/s
DQ Read 361
DQ Write 299
DQ Mixed 237
203% 299 MB/s
Poor: 65%
This bench: 73.6%
Great: 117%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Corsair Vengeance SODIM CMSX32GX4M1A2666C18 2x31.5GB
2 of 2 slots used
63GB SODIMM DDR4 2667 MHz clocked @ 2400 MHz
Performing below potential (5th percentile) - Ensure that the top XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
61.1% Good
MC Read 25.8
MC Write 23.8
MC Mixed 20.2
66% 23.3 GB/s
SC Read 8.7
SC Write 21.4
SC Mixed 12.4
40% 14.2 GB/s
Latency 154
26% 154 ns
Poor: 61%
This bench: 61.1%
Great: 88%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical MS-17F3 Builds (Compare 1,353 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 13%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 74%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 13%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: MSI MS-17F3

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $165Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $112Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $389WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $85
Intel Core i5-13600K $200Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback