Gigabyte GA-AORUS 15-SA

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 67%
Battle cruiser
Desktop
Desktop 92%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 60%
Destroyer
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (74th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 26 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 87.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics70.3% is a good 3D score. This GPU can handle the majority of recent games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive223% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
MotherboardGigabyte GA-AORUS 15-SA  (all builds)
Memory12.6 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20190524
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateNov 24 '22 at 18:38
Run Duration124 Seconds
Run User GBR-User
Background CPU6%

 PC Performing above expectations (74th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-9750H
U3E1, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 2.6 GHz, turbo 3.6 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (96th percentile)
87.5% Excellent
Memory 94
1-Core 110
2-Core 220
81% 141 Pts
4-Core 436
8-Core 730
71% 583 Pts
64-Core 882
55% 882 Pts
Poor: 49%
This bench: 87.5%
Great: 87%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1660-Ti (Mobile)
Gigabyte(1458 3492) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 2115 MHz, MLim: 3200 MHz, Ram: 6GB, Driver: 526.86
Performing way above expectations (92nd percentile)
70.3% Very good
Lighting 86.7
Reflection 93
Parallax 84.5
71% 88.1 fps
MRender 103
Gravity 82.9
Splatting 74.7
70% 86.9 fps
Poor: 45%
This bench: 70.3%
Great: 72%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Intel 760p Series NVMe PCIe M.2 512GB-$4
128GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 005C Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 441 478 334 312 272 356 MB/s
Performing as expected (45th percentile)
223% Outstanding
Read 2,135
Write 829
Mixed 1,260
SusWrite 366
253% 1,147 MB/s
4K Read 53.3
4K Write 116
4K Mixed 74.5
237% 81.1 MB/s
DQ Read 1,058
DQ Write 793
DQ Mixed 363
424% 738 MB/s
Poor: 148%
This bench: 223%
Great: 293%
Seagate ST1000LM048-2E7172 1TB
370GB free
Firmware: 0001
SusWrite @10s intervals: 80 81 95 97 99 98 MB/s
Performing as expected (40th percentile)
45.7% Average
Read 67
Write 120
Mixed 55.9
SusWrite 91.9
61% 83.6 MB/s
4K Read 1
4K Write 1.3
4K Mixed 0.6
132% 0.97 MB/s
Poor: 29%
This bench: 45.7%
Great: 71%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M471A1K43CB1-CTD 2x8GB
2 of 2 slots used
16GB SODIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2667 MHz
Performing way above expectations (95th percentile)
83.9% Excellent
MC Read 32.3
MC Write 33.1
MC Mixed 23
84% 29.5 GB/s
SC Read 17.5
SC Write 36.3
SC Mixed 24.9
75% 26.2 GB/s
Latency 59.8
67% 59.8 ns
Poor: 57%
This bench: 83.9%
Great: 84%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical GA-AORUS 15-SA Builds (Compare 16 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 53%
Yacht
Desktop
Desktop 83%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 47%
Yacht

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-AORUS 15-SA

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 617% - Outstanding Total price: $4
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $165Nvidia RTX 4060 $285WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-13600K $248Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $374WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $499Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $417
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback