Today's hottest deals

MSI X470 GAMING PRO CARBON AC (MS-7B78)

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 118%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 97%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 112%
UFO
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (79th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 21 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 92.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics124% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
SystemMicro-Star MS-7B78
MotherboardMSI X470 GAMING PRO CARBON AC (MS-7B78)  (all builds)
Memory25.2 GB free of 32 GB @ 2.9 GHz
Display3440 x 1440 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20190306
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateJul 11 '22 at 20:59
Run Duration296 Seconds
Run User CHE-User
Background CPU6%

 PC Performing above expectations (79th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 7 2700X-$150
AM4, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads
Base clock 3.7 GHz, turbo 4.05 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
92.4% Outstanding
Memory 89.1
1-Core 121
2-Core 248
85% 153 Pts
4-Core 514
8-Core 897
85% 706 Pts
64-Core 1,120
69% 1,120 Pts
Poor: 61%
This bench: 92.4%
Great: 89%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1080-Ti-$237
Asus(1043 85E5) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1911 MHz, MLim: 2752 MHz, Ram: 11GB, Driver: 516.59
Performing below potential (55th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
124% Outstanding
Lighting 169
Reflection 184
Parallax 179
138% 177 fps
MRender 133
Gravity 177
Splatting 121
116% 144 fps
Poor: 109%
This bench: 124%
Great: 133%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
WD Black NVMe PCIe M.2 256GB (2017)-$129
179GB free
Firmware: B35900WD Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 220 190 210 211 207 188 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (85th percentile)
136% Outstanding
Read 882
Write 336
Mixed 222
SusWrite 204
90% 411 MB/s
4K Read 41.4
4K Write 92
4K Mixed 52.7
179% 62 MB/s
DQ Read 964
DQ Write 509
DQ Mixed 291
335% 588 MB/s
Poor: 86%
This bench: 136%
Great: 144%
OCZ Trion 100 960GB-$310
893GB free
Firmware: SAFM11.2
SusWrite @10s intervals: 409 162 134 137 132 137 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (95th percentile)
88.9% Excellent
Read 506
Write 488
Mixed 352
SusWrite 185
86% 383 MB/s
4K Read 29
4K Write 82.9
4K Mixed 37
135% 49.6 MB/s
DQ Read 338
DQ Write 368
DQ Mixed 197
191% 301 MB/s
Poor: 49%
This bench: 88.9%
Great: 89%
Samsung 970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 1TB-$118
781GB free
Firmware: 2B2QEXM7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 2488 2227 1496 1505 1517 1518 MB/s
Performing above expectations (77th percentile)
356% Outstanding
Read 2,561
Write 2,474
Mixed 1,929
SusWrite 1,792
492% 2,189 MB/s
4K Read 64.4
4K Write 169
4K Mixed 93.1
307% 109 MB/s
DQ Read 1,165
DQ Write 1,016
DQ Mixed 1,079
812% 1,087 MB/s
Poor: 188%
This bench: 356%
Great: 410%
Crucial M500 480GB-$81
438GB free
Firmware: MU03
SusWrite @10s intervals: 362 380 402 399 409 410 MB/s
Performing above expectations (80th percentile)
93.9% Outstanding
Read 406
Write 410
Mixed 341
SusWrite 394
88% 388 MB/s
4K Read 24.5
4K Write 83.7
4K Mixed 34.2
125% 47.5 MB/s
DQ Read 339
DQ Write 337
DQ Mixed 189
183% 288 MB/s
Poor: 59%
This bench: 93.9%
Great: 100%
SanDisk Ultra Fit USB 3.0 16GB-$9
3GB free, PID 5583
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 38 12 10 10 11 10 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (98th percentile)
30.6% Below average
Read 124
Write 40.4
Mixed 52.7
SusWrite 15.2
64% 58 MB/s
4K Read 5.6
4K Write 2.6
4K Mixed 3.6
232% 3.93 MB/s
Poor: 10%
This bench: 30.6%
Great: 31%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
G.SKILL Flare X DDR4 3200 C14 4x8GB-$192
4 of 4 slots used
32GB DIMM DDR4 2933 MHz clocked @ 1467 MHz
Performing below potential (44th percentile) - Ensure that the top XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
99.3% Outstanding
MC Read 39.2
MC Write 32.7
MC Mixed 34.9
102% 35.6 GB/s
SC Read 27.4
SC Write 35.8
SC Mixed 29.4
88% 30.9 GB/s
Latency 68.4
58% 68.4 ns
Poor: 72%
This bench: 99.3%
Great: 142%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical X470 GAMING PRO CARBON AC (MS-7B78) Builds (Compare 57 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 82%
Aircraft carrier
Desktop
Desktop 85%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 80%
Aircraft carrier

Motherboard: MSI X470 GAMING PRO CARBON AC (MS-7B78)

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 101% - Outstanding Total price: $429
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $165Nvidia RTX 4060 $290WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $129
Intel Core i5-13600K $210Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $389WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $80
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $406
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback