Asus VivoBook_ASUSLaptop X512JP

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming 8% Tree trunk	Desktop 66% Battle cruiser	Workstation 7% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing above expectations (73rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 27 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 69.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics	7.18% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Memory	12GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 12GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

CPU throttled at 83% by Windows. Ensure maximum processor state is set to 100% via Settings > System > Power & sleep > Additional power settings > Change plan settings > Change advanced power settings > Processor power management > Maximum processor state.

System	Asus VivoBook_ASUSLaptop X512JP (all builds)
Motherboard	ASUSTeK X512JP
Memory	6.7 GB free of 12 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit cores,
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20210526
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Apr 18 '22 at 22:28
Run Duration	159 Seconds
Run User	PRT-User
Background CPU	3%
CPU Throttled	83%

PC Performing above expectations (73^rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i5-1035G1 53,170 User benchmarks, average bench 51% U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads Base clock 1.2 GHz, turbo 3.2 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (99^th percentile)	69.8% Good	Memory 77.1 1-Core 112 2-Core 210 75% 133 Pts	4-Core 347 8-Core 436 50% 391 Pts	64-Core 534 33% 534 Pts
Poor: 28% ↑ This bench: 69.8% Great: 68%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Intel UHD G1 FAQ - How to force Optimus or Switchable discrete GPUs? Asus(1043 1B2F) 1GB Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 30.0.100.9864 Performing way above expectations (100^th percentile)	7.18% Terrible	Lighting 8.1 Reflection 18.7 Parallax 7.7 7% 11.5 fps	MRender 10.2 Gravity 8.5 Splatting 11.3 8% 10 fps
Poor: 3% ↑ This bench: 7.18% Great: 7%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Nvme WDC PC SN520 SDA 256GB 3,002 User benchmarks, average bench 148% 49GB free (System drive) Firmware: 20200000 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete		Read 884 Write 1,141 Mixed 1,060 231% 1,028 MB/s	4K Read 45.1 4K Write 138 4K Mixed 64.1 224% 82.4 MB/s	DQ Read 819 DQ Write 688 DQ Mixed 728 552% 745 MB/s
Poor: 102% Great: 179%
WD WD10SPZX-00HKTT0 1TB 294,991 User benchmarks, average bench 56% 303GB free Firmware: 02.01A02 SusWrite @10s intervals: 113 112 115 115 112 116 MB/s Performing way above expectations (88^th percentile)	71.5% Very good	Read 135 Write 84.7 Mixed 66.8 SusWrite 114 74% 100 MB/s	4K Read 1.2 4K Write 1.7 4K Mixed 0.6 148% 1.17 MB/s
Poor: 26% ↑ This bench: 71.5% Great: 79%
SanDisk Ultra Fit USB 3.0 16GB-$8 10,486 User benchmarks, average bench 22% 12GB free, PID 5583 Operating at USB 2.1 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 10 9.2 9.2 9 9.3 9.2 MB/s Performing way below expectations (8^th percentile)	9.52% Terrible	Read 35.4 Write 10 Mixed 19.1 SusWrite 9.4 21% 18.5 MB/s	4K Read 4.7 4K Write 0.4 4K Mixed 3.4 147% 2.83 MB/s
Poor: 10% ↑ This bench: 9.52% Great: 31%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Micron 4ATF51264HZ-2G6E1 8ATF1G64HZ-3G2R1 12GB 22 User benchmarks, average bench 48% 2667, 3200 MHz 4096, 8192 MB Performing above expectations (70^th percentile)	55% Above average	MC Read 22.5 MC Write 18.7 MC Mixed 16.8 55% 19.3 GB/s	SC Read 13.9 SC Write 19.8 SC Mixed 16.2 48% 16.6 GB/s	Latency 86.1 46% 86.1 ns
Poor: 27% ↑ This bench: 55% Great: 67%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical VivoBook_ASUSLaptop X512JP Builds (Compare 8 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 10%

Tree trunk

Desktop 55%

Yacht

Workstation 10%

Tree trunk

System: Asus VivoBook_ASUSLaptop X512JP

CPU
Core i5-1035G1IntelBench 51%, 53,170 samples	5x
Core i7-1065G7IntelBench 53%, 58,314 samples	3x

GPU
UHD G1IntelBench 5%, 68,603 samples	4x
Iris Plus G7IntelBench 9%, 52,498 samples	3x
GeForce MX330NvidiaBench 14%, 4,518 samples	1x

SSD
WDC PC SN530 SDBPNPZ-256G-1002 256GBNvmeBench 117%, 2,488 samples	1x
660p NVMe PCIe M.2 512GBIntel $60Bench 156%, 162,275 samples	1x
PC SN520 SDAPNUW-256G-1202 256GBWDCBench 145%, 4,206 samples	1x

RAM
4ATF51264HZ-2G6E1 Hynix HMA851S6DJR6N-XN 8GBMicronBench 69%, 342 samples	3x
4ATS1G64HZ-2G6E1 1x8GBMicronBench 40%, 1,279 samples	1x
M471A5244CB0-CTD M471A5244CB0-CWE 8GBSamsungBench 66%, 488 samples	1x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $269	Nvidia RTX 4060 $295	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $178	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16