Today's hottest deals

Asus VivoBook_ASUSLaptop X512JP

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 8%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 66%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 7%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (73rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 27 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 69.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics7.18% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Memory12GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 12GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
CPU throttled at 83% by Windows. Ensure maximum processor state is set to 100% via Settings > System > Power & sleep > Additional power settings > Change plan settings > Change advanced power settings > Processor power management > Maximum processor state.
SystemAsus VivoBook_ASUSLaptop X512JP  (all builds)
MotherboardASUSTeK X512JP
Memory6.7 GB free of 12 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit cores,
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20210526
Uptime0 Days
Run DateApr 18 '22 at 22:28
Run Duration159 Seconds
Run User PRT-User
Background CPU3%
CPU Throttled 83%

 PC Performing above expectations (73rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-1035G1
U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 1.2 GHz, turbo 3.2 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (99th percentile)
69.8% Good
Memory 77.1
1-Core 112
2-Core 210
75% 133 Pts
4-Core 347
8-Core 436
50% 391 Pts
64-Core 534
33% 534 Pts
Poor: 28%
This bench: 69.8%
Great: 68%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel UHD G1
Asus(1043 1B2F) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 30.0.100.9864
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
7.18% Terrible
Lighting 8.1
Reflection 18.7
Parallax 7.7
7% 11.5 fps
MRender 10.2
Gravity 8.5
Splatting 11.3
8% 10 fps
Poor: 3%
This bench: 7.18%
Great: 7%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Nvme WDC PC SN520 SDA 256GB
49GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 20200000 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 884
Write 1,141
Mixed 1,060
231% 1,028 MB/s
4K Read 45.1
4K Write 138
4K Mixed 64.1
224% 82.4 MB/s
DQ Read 819
DQ Write 688
DQ Mixed 728
552% 745 MB/s
Poor: 102% Great: 179%
WD WD10SPZX-00HKTT0 1TB
303GB free
Firmware: 02.01A02
SusWrite @10s intervals: 113 112 115 115 112 116 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (88th percentile)
71.5% Very good
Read 135
Write 84.7
Mixed 66.8
SusWrite 114
74% 100 MB/s
4K Read 1.2
4K Write 1.7
4K Mixed 0.6
148% 1.17 MB/s
Poor: 26%
This bench: 71.5%
Great: 79%
SanDisk Ultra Fit USB 3.0 16GB-$9
12GB free, PID 5583
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 10 9.2 9.2 9 9.3 9.2 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (8th percentile)
9.52% Terrible
Read 35.4
Write 10
Mixed 19.1
SusWrite 9.4
21% 18.5 MB/s
4K Read 4.7
4K Write 0.4
4K Mixed 3.4
147% 2.83 MB/s
Poor: 10%
This bench: 9.52%
Great: 31%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Micron 4ATF51264HZ-2G6E1 8ATF1G64HZ-3G2R1 12GB
2667, 3200 MHz
4096, 8192 MB
Performing above expectations (70th percentile)
55% Above average
MC Read 22.5
MC Write 18.7
MC Mixed 16.8
55% 19.3 GB/s
SC Read 13.9
SC Write 19.8
SC Mixed 16.2
48% 16.6 GB/s
Latency 86.1
46% 86.1 ns
Poor: 27%
This bench: 55%
Great: 67%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical VivoBook_ASUSLaptop X512JP Builds (Compare 8 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 10%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 55%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 10%
Tree trunk

System: Asus VivoBook_ASUSLaptop X512JP

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $165Nvidia RTX 4060 $290WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $129
Intel Core i5-13600K $210Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $389WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $80
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $406
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback