Asrock B360M Pro4

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (80th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 20 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 89.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics109% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Memory48GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 48GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
Run History
23 months ago, 23 months ago.
MotherboardAsrock B360M Pro4  (all builds)
Memory42.4 GB free of 48 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20191206
Uptime0.9 Days
Run DateJul 10 '22 at 20:25
Run Duration225 Seconds
Run User GBR-User
Background CPU1%
Watch Gameplay: 2070 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing above expectations (80th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-8700-$186
CPUSocket, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 3.2 GHz, turbo 4.3 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (73rd percentile)
89.8% Excellent
Memory 92.4
1-Core 138
2-Core 258
91% 163 Pts
4-Core 469
8-Core 853
79% 661 Pts
64-Core 1,072
66% 1,072 Pts
Poor: 75%
This bench: 89.8%
Great: 94%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 2070-$200
Gigabyte(1458 37C8) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 2100 MHz, MLim: 3500 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 516.59
Performing way above expectations (86th percentile)
109% Outstanding
Lighting 136
Reflection 120
Parallax 152
111% 136 fps
MRender 186
Gravity 130
Splatting 110
112% 142 fps
Poor: 93%
This bench: 109%
Great: 112%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 970 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 1TB-$150
828GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 2B2QEXE7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 648
Write 570
Mixed 584
134% 601 MB/s
4K Read 56.8
4K Write 99.6
4K Mixed 71.4
230% 75.9 MB/s
DQ Read 830
DQ Write 714
DQ Mixed 917
648% 821 MB/s
Poor: 214% Great: 372%
WDC WDS200T2B0C-00PXH0 2TB
2TB free
Firmware: 21705000
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 1,573
Write 1,446
Mixed 1,157
310% 1,392 MB/s
4K Read 45.2
4K Write 120
4K Mixed 60.6
210% 75.3 MB/s
DQ Read 1,141
DQ Write 820
DQ Mixed 985
735% 982 MB/s
Poor: 158% Great: 283%
Adata SU630 240GB
223GB free
Firmware: R1210A0
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 441
Write 352
Mixed 10.1
58% 268 MB/s
4K Read 21.2
4K Write 5.3
4K Mixed 0.4
35% 8.97 MB/s
Poor: 28% Great: 101%
Sandisk Extreme SSD 1TB
931GB free
Firmware: 1012
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 355
Write 363
Mixed 274
74% 331 MB/s
4K Read 21
4K Write 38.5
4K Mixed 27.1
87% 28.9 MB/s
DQ Read 123
DQ Write 140
DQ Mixed 95.6
82% 120 MB/s
Poor: 52% Great: 87%
ST4000LM 024-2AN17V 4TB
3.5TB free, PID 0567
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 115
Write 129
Mixed 62.6
128% 102 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 4.5
4K Mixed 0.8
183% 2.03 MB/s
Poor: 23% Great: 59%
ST340062 0AS 400GB
337GB free, PID 0567
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
Read 71.3
Write 45.8
Mixed 47.7
66% 54.9 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.4
4K Mixed 0.8
77% 0.97 MB/s
Poor: 26% Great: 30%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown TEAMGROUP-UD4-2666 029E CMK32GX4M2A2666C16 04EF TEAMGROUP-UD4-2666 029E CMK32GX4M2A2666C16 48GB
2133, 2133, 2133, 2133 MHz
8192, 16384, 8192, 16384 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
74.4% Very good
MC Read 26.4
MC Write 28.1
MC Mixed 22.6
73% 25.7 GB/s
SC Read 18.2
SC Write 31.5
SC Mixed 24.3
70% 24.7 GB/s
Latency 63.3
63% 63.3 ns
Poor: 71%
This bench: 74.4%
Great: 74%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical B360M Pro4 Builds (Compare 1,221 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 51%
Yacht
Desktop
Desktop 86%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 43%
Speed boat

Motherboard: Asrock B360M Pro4 - $21

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 93% - Outstanding Total price: $375
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $160Nvidia RTX 4060 $290WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $388WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $79
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $363
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback