Today's hottest deals

Asus H110M-R

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 34%
Sail boat
Desktop
Desktop 71%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 27%
Raft
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (30th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 70 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 59.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics51% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive51% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
High background CPU (21%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
MotherboardAsus H110M-R  (all builds)
Memory9.2 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.1 GHz
DisplayЦвета: 1920 x 1200 - 32 Bit
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20181127
Uptime0.2 Days
Run DateJul 05 '22 at 17:48
Run Duration194 Seconds
Run User RUS-User
Background CPU 21%
Watch Gameplay: 1060-3GB + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing below expectations (30th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i3-6100-$37
LGA1151, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.7 GHz, turbo 3.7 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (61st percentile)
59.4% Above average
Memory 75.4
1-Core 102
2-Core 155
66% 111 Pts
4-Core 251
8-Core 261
34% 256 Pts
64-Core 258
16% 258 Pts
Poor: 29%
This bench: 59.4%
Great: 68%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1060-3GB-$144
Asus(1043 85ED) 3GB
CLim: 1911 MHz, MLim: 2002 MHz, Ram: 3GB, Driver: 516.59
Performing below potential (45th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
51% Above average
Lighting 62.2
Reflection 65.4
Parallax 61
51% 62.9 fps
MRender 68.5
Gravity 62.3
Splatting 59.8
52% 63.5 fps
Poor: 48%
This bench: 51%
Great: 56%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 870 QVO 1TB-$90
321GB free (System drive)
Firmware: SVQ02B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 77 76 76 77 78 77 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (8th percentile)
51% Above average
Read 392
Write 77.7
Mixed 127
SusWrite 76.8
37% 168 MB/s
4K Read 12.3
4K Write 77.4
4K Mixed 17.8
82% 35.8 MB/s
DQ Read 185
DQ Write 79.1
DQ Mixed 104
84% 122 MB/s
Poor: 48%
This bench: 51%
Great: 128%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Patriot 3000 C16 Series 2x8GB
2 of 2 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz
Performing below potential (6th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
59.1% Above average
MC Read 21.3
MC Write 22.7
MC Mixed 19.7
61% 21.2 GB/s
SC Read 13.8
SC Write 16.6
SC Mixed 19.3
47% 16.6 GB/s
Latency 89.6
45% 89.6 ns
Poor: 59%
This bench: 59.1%
Great: 102%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical H110M-R Builds (Compare 3,768 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 22%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 73%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 17%
Surfboard

Motherboard: Asus H110M-R

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 91% - Outstanding Total price: $154
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $169Nvidia RTX 4060 $298WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $345WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $75
Intel Core i5-13600K $209Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback