Today's hottest deals

Asus M5A97 LE R2.0

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU, SSD
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (61st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 39 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 58.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
MotherboardAsus M5A97 LE R2.0  (all builds)
Memory6.4 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1024 x 768 - 32 Bit colores
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20160324
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJun 01 '22 at 04:43
Run Duration131 Seconds
Run User PRY-User
Background CPU5%

 PC Performing above expectations (61st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD FX-4130 Quad-Core-$150
Socket 942, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.8 GHz, turbo 3.75 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (96th percentile)
58.8% Above average
Memory 84.7
1-Core 67
2-Core 124
58% 92.1 Pts
4-Core 194
8-Core 195
26% 194 Pts
64-Core 190
12% 190 Pts
Poor: 39%
This bench: 58.8%
Great: 59%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Seagate Video SV35.6 Series 1TB-$50
915GB free (System drive)
Firmware: CV22
SusWrite @10s intervals: 101 156 172 174 170 162 MB/s
Performing as expected (54th percentile)
93.8% Outstanding
Read 172
Write 160
Mixed 57
SusWrite 156
99% 136 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 0.9
4K Mixed 0.9
142% 0.8 MB/s
Poor: 57%
This bench: 93.8%
Great: 119%
Kingston DataTraveler 2.0 16GB
3GB free, PID 6545
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 3.5 3.6 2.5 4.1 3 4.8 MB/s
Performing above expectations (71st percentile)
5.39% Terrible
Read 26.9
Write 23.3
Mixed 2.5
SusWrite 3.6
16% 14.1 MB/s
4K Read 3
4K Write 0
4K Mixed 0
11% 1 MB/s
Poor: 3%
This bench: 5.39%
Great: 6%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
G.SKILL Ripjaws DDR3 1600 C9 2x4GB
2 of 4 slots used
8GB DIMM DDR3 1600 MHz clocked @ 800 MHz
Performing below potential (22nd percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
45.4% Average
MC Read 20.1
MC Write 12.6
MC Mixed 15.9
46% 16.2 GB/s
SC Read 9.4
SC Write 8.5
SC Mixed 12.1
29% 10 GB/s
Latency 72.3
55% 72.3 ns
Poor: 31%
This bench: 45.4%
Great: 63%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical M5A97 LE R2.0 Builds (Compare 1,492 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 21%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 65%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 17%
Surfboard

Motherboard: Asus M5A97 LE R2.0 - $75

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 82% - Excellent Total price: $249
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $210Nvidia RTX 4060 $285WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $125
Intel Core i5-12600K $160Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $389WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $80
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $330
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback