Gigabyte GA-AX370-Gaming K7

Performance Results


Gaming 48% Yacht	Desktop 78% Battleship	Workstation 57% Gunboat


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (35th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 65 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 76%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics	60.6% is a good 3D score. This GPU can handle the majority of recent games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive	11.2% is an extremely low SSD score, this system will benefit from a faster SSD.
Memory	24GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 24GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Very high background CPU (64%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

Run History

23 months ago, 23 months ago.

Motherboard	Gigabyte GA-AX370-Gaming K7 (all builds)
Memory	10.8 GB free of 24 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20220428
Uptime	1.3 Days
Run Date	May 26 '22 at 07:43
Run Duration	232 Seconds
Run User	USA-User
Background CPU	64%

Watch Gameplay: 1060-6GB + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

PC Performing below expectations (35^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
AMD Ryzen 9 5900X-$260 60,132 User benchmarks, average bench 99% AM4, 1 CPU, 12 cores, 24 threads Base clock 3.7 GHz, turbo 4.4 GHz (avg) Performing way below expectations (0^th percentile)	76% Very good	Memory 58.3 1-Core 135 2-Core 280 82% 158 Pts	4-Core 502 8-Core 851 82% 676 Pts	64-Core 2,105 130% 2,105 Pts
Poor: 87% ↑ This bench: 76% Great: 108%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1060-6GB-$117 1,368,019 User benchmarks, average bench 56% EVGA(3842 6268) ≥ 4GB CLim: 2025 MHz, MLim: 2002 MHz, Ram: 6GB, Driver: 512.15 Performing way above expectations (98^th percentile)	60.6% Good	Lighting 77.5 Reflection 76.9 Parallax 73.8 63% 76.1 fps	MRender 64.8 Gravity 71.4 Splatting 67.1 56% 67.8 fps
Poor: 51% ↑ This bench: 60.6% Great: 60%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k
Spcc Solid State Disk 512GB 30,264 User benchmarks, average bench 71% 274GB free (System drive) Firmware: S0628A0 SusWrite @10s intervals: 144 102 71 2.6 40 11 MB/s Relative performance (0^th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable	11.2% Very poor	Read 5.7 Write 4 Mixed 146 SusWrite 61.7 12% 54.2 MB/s	4K Read 16.8 4K Write 2.7 4K Mixed 0.3 27% 6.6 MB/s
Poor: 33% ↑ This bench: 11.2% Great: 102%
WD WD140EDGZ-11B1PA0 14TB 321 User benchmarks, average bench 94% 10TB free Firmware: 85.00A85 SusWrite @10s intervals: 166 154 174 190 192 188 MB/s Performing as expected (48^th percentile)	96.8% Outstanding	Read 159 Write 164 Mixed 119 SusWrite 177 114% 155 MB/s	4K Read 3.4 4K Write 3.3 4K Mixed 2.9 525% 3.2 MB/s
Poor: 52% ↑ This bench: 96.8% Great: 117%
WD WD100EZAZ-11TDBA0 10TB 394 User benchmarks, average bench 91% 2.5TB free Firmware: 83.H0A83 SusWrite @10s intervals: 94 70 80 94 91 110 MB/s Performing way below expectations (5^th percentile)	58.3% Above average	Read 112 Write 126 Mixed 46.5 SusWrite 90 68% 93.7 MB/s	4K Read 1 4K Write 5.3 4K Mixed 1.4 295% 2.57 MB/s
Poor: 58% ↑ This bench: 58.3% Great: 115%
WD WD80EMAZ-00WJTA0 8TB 5,351 User benchmarks, average bench 82% 2.5TB free Firmware: 83.H0A83 SusWrite @10s intervals: 111 107 128 150 146 157 MB/s Performing way below expectations (9^th percentile)	58.7% Above average	Read 71.5 Write 68 Mixed 48.5 SusWrite 133 59% 80.3 MB/s	4K Read 0.4 4K Write 1.1 4K Mixed 0.7 115% 0.73 MB/s
Poor: 53% ↑ This bench: 58.7% Great: 105%
WD WD80EMAZ-00WJTA0 8TB 5,351 User benchmarks, average bench 82% 83GB free Firmware: 83.H0A83 SusWrite @10s intervals: 156 140 163 179 171 179 MB/s Performing above expectations (72^nd percentile)	91.4% Outstanding	Read 153 Write 150 Mixed 86.2 SusWrite 165 102% 138 MB/s	4K Read 2 4K Write 4.6 4K Mixed 1 280% 2.53 MB/s
Poor: 53% ↑ This bench: 91.4% Great: 105%
WD WD80EMAZ-00WJTA0 8TB 5,351 User benchmarks, average bench 82% 72GB free Firmware: 83.H0A83 SusWrite @10s intervals: 119 113 125 130 129 129 MB/s Performing below expectations (37^th percentile)	77.5% Very good	Read 145 Write 150 Mixed 87.2 SusWrite 124 93% 127 MB/s	4K Read 2 4K Write 4.7 4K Mixed 1 282% 2.57 MB/s
Poor: 53% ↑ This bench: 77.5% Great: 105%
WD WD120EMAZ-11BLFA0 12TB 255 User benchmarks, average bench 90% 499GB free Firmware: 81.00A81 SusWrite @10s intervals: 97 104 112 124 121 124 MB/s Performing way below expectations (7^th percentile)	58.3% Above average	Read 88.2 Write 100 Mixed 47.7 SusWrite 114 64% 87.5 MB/s	4K Read 0.5 4K Write 5.2 4K Mixed 0.7 195% 2.13 MB/s
Poor: 54% ↑ This bench: 58.3% Great: 114%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown CMK16GX4M2B3200C16 CMK16GX4M2B3200C16 F4-2800C16-8GVG 24GB 2133, 2133, 2133 MHz 8192, 8192, 8192 MB Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples	50.6% Above average	MC Read 20 MC Write 17.8 MC Mixed 18.2 53% 18.7 GB/s	SC Read 12.5 SC Write 13.1 SC Mixed 13.9 38% 13.2 GB/s	Latency 133 30% 133 ns

Take a copy of your results

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical GA-AX370-Gaming K7 Builds (Compare 525 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 79%

Battleship

Desktop 79%

Battleship

Workstation 77%

Battleship

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-AX370-Gaming K7 - $229

CPU
Ryzen 7 1800XAMD $60Bench 72%, 30,050 samples	96x
Ryzen 7 1700XAMD $211Bench 71%, 66,470 samples	69x
Ryzen 7 1700AMD $195Bench 69%, 144,475 samples	59x

GPU
GTX 1080Nvidia $400Bench 102%, 1,082,454 samples	67x
GTX 1080-TiNvidia $485Bench 124%, 840,268 samples	57x
GTX 1070Nvidia $132Bench 80%, 1,459,281 samples	29x

SSD
850 Evo 500GBSamsung $90Bench 112%, 695,664 samples	22x
960 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 500GBSamsung $43Bench 213%, 165,668 samples	21x
960 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 250GBSamsung $45Bench 199%, 240,629 samples	17x

RAM
Flare X DDR4 3200 C14 2x8GBG.SKILL $73Bench 98%, 54,616 samples	20x
Ripjaws V DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GBG.SKILL $35Bench 84%, 287,720 samples	18x
Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GBCorsair $43Bench 82%, 606,405 samples	11x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 66% - Good

Total price: $852

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $269	Nvidia RTX 4060 $295	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $177	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16

Gigabyte GA-AX370-Gaming K7

Performance Results

Run History

PC Performing below expectations (35th percentile)

System Memory Latency Ladder

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-AX370-Gaming K7 - $229

Feedback

PC Performing below expectations (35^th percentile)