Today's hottest deals

MSI A320M PRO-VH PLUS (MS-7B07)

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 28%
Raft
Desktop
Desktop 82%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 24%
Surfboard
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (58th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 42 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 78.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics26.5% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive60.6% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
High background CPU (24%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemMicro-Star MS-7B07
MotherboardMSI A320M PRO-VH PLUS (MS-7B07)  (all builds)
Memory12.4 GB free of 16 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display1440 x 900 - 32 Bit renk
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20190122
Uptime11.4 Days
Run DateMay 24 '22 at 20:58
Run Duration159 Seconds
Run User TUR-User
Background CPU 24%

 PC Performing as expected (58th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 3 2200G-$75
AM4, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.5 GHz, turbo 3.4 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
78.2% Very good
Memory 81.6
1-Core 104
2-Core 203
74% 130 Pts
4-Core 432
8-Core 433
58% 432 Pts
64-Core 430
27% 430 Pts
Poor: 43%
This bench: 78.2%
Great: 72%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1050-$101
CLim: 1961 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 512.59
Performing below potential (76th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
26.5% Poor
Lighting 33
Reflection 40.6
Parallax 29.8
27% 34.5 fps
MRender 38.1
Gravity 35.1
Splatting 24
26% 32.4 fps
Poor: 24%
This bench: 26.5%
Great: 28%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
SanDisk SSD Plus 120GB-$30
27GB free (System drive)
Firmware: Z32080RL
SusWrite @10s intervals: 171 45 38 45 42 38 MB/s
Performing as expected (56th percentile)
60.6% Good
Read 399
Write 316
Mixed 343
SusWrite 63.1
62% 280 MB/s
4K Read 20.2
4K Write 82.9
4K Mixed 20.4
101% 41.2 MB/s
DQ Read 202
DQ Write 285
DQ Mixed 33
84% 173 MB/s
Poor: 35%
This bench: 60.6%
Great: 78%
WD Black 500GB (2012)-$47
113GB free
Firmware: 01.00A01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 73 74 73 75 75 75 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (6th percentile)
42.5% Average
Read 74
Write 78
Mixed 61.5
SusWrite 74.1
53% 71.9 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 1.1
4K Mixed 0.6
108% 0.73 MB/s
Poor: 43%
This bench: 42.5%
Great: 105%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Adata DDR4 3200 2x8GB
2 of 2 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 3200 MHz clocked @ 1600 MHz
Performing as expected (51st percentile)
86.8% Excellent
MC Read 35.6
MC Write 25.2
MC Mixed 32
88% 30.9 GB/s
SC Read 22.8
SC Write 35
SC Mixed 25.5
79% 27.8 GB/s
Latency 77.7
52% 77.7 ns
Poor: 65%
This bench: 86.8%
Great: 112%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical A320M PRO-VH PLUS (MS-7B07) Builds (Compare 456 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 26%
Raft
Desktop
Desktop 72%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 24%
Surfboard

Motherboard: MSI A320M PRO-VH PLUS (MS-7B07)

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 96% - Outstanding Total price: $259
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $210Nvidia RTX 4060 $285WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $125
Intel Core i5-12600K $154Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $389WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $80
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $320
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback