Today's hottest deals

Razer Blade

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 15%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 73%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 14%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (81st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 19 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 72.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics14% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive55.3% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
SystemRazer Blade  (all builds)
MotherboardRAZER RAZER
Memory4.8 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1600 x 900 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20130520
Uptime0 Days
Run DateMay 23 '22 at 10:16
Run Duration149 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU5%

 PC Performing above expectations (81st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-4702HQ
SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 2.2 GHz, turbo 3.1 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (96th percentile)
72.2% Very good
Memory 85.3
1-Core 93.7
2-Core 182
70% 120 Pts
4-Core 320
8-Core 468
49% 394 Pts
64-Core 469
29% 469 Pts
Poor: 34%
This bench: 72.2%
Great: 72%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 765M
Device(1B61 2007) 2GB
Driver: nvldumdx.dll Ver. 25.21.14.2531
Performing way above expectations (98th percentile)
14% Very poor
Lighting 16.7
Reflection 14.7
Parallax 21.3
14% 17.6 fps
MRender 17.4
Gravity 21.9
Splatting 16
15% 18.4 fps
Poor: 11%
This bench: 14%
Great: 14%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung MZMTD512HAGL-00000 512GB
101GB free (System drive)
Firmware: DXT4200Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 146 163 141 103 120 161 MB/s
Performing below potential (36th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
55.3% Above average
Read 278
Write 131
Mixed 127
SusWrite 139
37% 169 MB/s
4K Read 25.5
4K Write 58.5
4K Mixed 22.2
98% 35.4 MB/s
DQ Read 215
DQ Write 66
DQ Mixed 67.9
69% 116 MB/s
Poor: 44%
This bench: 55.3%
Great: 77%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Hynix HMT451U6AFR8A-PB 2x4GB
2 of 4 slots used
8GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz
Performing way above expectations (93rd percentile)
56.6% Above average
MC Read 21.1
MC Write 20.8
MC Mixed 16.7
56% 19.5 GB/s
SC Read 15.3
SC Write 18
SC Mixed 19.7
50% 17.7 GB/s
Latency 71.7
56% 71.7 ns
Poor: 30%
This bench: 56.6%
Great: 58%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Blade Builds (Compare 4,196 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 13%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 70%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 12%
Tree trunk

System: Razer Blade

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $210Nvidia RTX 4060 $285WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $125
Intel Core i5-12600K $155Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $389WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $80
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $320
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback