Today's hottest deals

MSI MPG Z390 GAMING PLUS (MS-7B51)

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 136%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 102%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 129%
UFO
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (83rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 17 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 103%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is outstanding.
Graphics131% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
2 years ago, 2 years ago.
SystemMicro-Star MS-7B51
MotherboardMSI MPG Z390 GAMING PLUS (MS-7B51)  (all builds)
Memory12.5 GB free of 16 GB @ 3.6 GHz
Display2560 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20201231
Uptime0 Days
Run DateMay 17 '22 at 12:40
Run Duration144 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU2%
Watch Gameplay: 3060-Ti + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing above expectations (83rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-9700K-$240
U3E1, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 4.6 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (90th percentile)
103% Outstanding
Memory 96
1-Core 151
2-Core 296
100% 181 Pts
4-Core 586
8-Core 1,122
101% 854 Pts
64-Core 1,149
71% 1,149 Pts
Poor: 82%
This bench: 103%
Great: 105%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 3060-Ti-$397
EVGA(3842 4663) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 2100 MHz, MLim: 3500 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 512.77
Performing below potential (78th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
131% Outstanding
Lighting 184
Reflection 178
Parallax 166
150% 176 fps
MRender 189
Gravity 140
Splatting 119
119% 149 fps
Poor: 116%
This bench: 131%
Great: 136%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
XPG GAMMIX S5 256GB
2GB free (System drive)
Firmware: V9002s65
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 1,911
Write 945
Mixed 642
255% 1,166 MB/s
4K Read 35.7
4K Write 116
4K Mixed 47.1
176% 66.3 MB/s
DQ Read 278
DQ Write 179
DQ Mixed 401
253% 286 MB/s
Poor: 81% Great: 241%
CT500MX500SSD4 500GB
201GB free
Firmware: M3CR023
SusWrite @10s intervals: 315 439 452 457 417 370 MB/s
Performing above expectations (69th percentile)
113% Outstanding
Read 467
Write 423
Mixed 409
SusWrite 408
96% 427 MB/s
4K Read 34.1
4K Write 96.5
4K Mixed 53.6
172% 61.4 MB/s
DQ Read 378
DQ Write 343
DQ Mixed 292
238% 338 MB/s
Poor: 77%
This bench: 113%
Great: 123%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
G.SKILL F4 DDR4 3600 C18 2x8GB
2 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3600 MHz
Performing way above expectations (96th percentile)
112% Outstanding
MC Read 43.6
MC Write 46.5
MC Mixed 31
115% 40.4 GB/s
SC Read 21
SC Write 49.1
SC Mixed 28.7
94% 32.9 GB/s
Latency 54.1
74% 54.1 ns
Poor: 63%
This bench: 112%
Great: 112%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical MPG Z390 GAMING PLUS (MS-7B51) Builds (Compare 24,160 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 91%
Nuclear submarine
Desktop
Desktop 101%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 84%
Aircraft carrier

Motherboard: MSI MPG Z390 GAMING PLUS (MS-7B51) - $268

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 119% - Outstanding Total price: $806
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $165Nvidia RTX 4060 $290WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $129
Intel Core i5-13600K $210Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $389WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $80
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $406
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback