Today's hottest deals

HP Notebook

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 1%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 43%
Speed boat
Workstation
Workstation 1%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (36th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 64 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 49.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics1.25% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
SystemHP Notebook  (all builds)
MotherboardHP 80C1
Memory4.7 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1366 x 768 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20150911
Uptime0 Days
Run DateApr 02 '22 at 03:26
Run Duration197 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU9%

 PC Performing below expectations (36th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Pentium 3825U
U3E1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 1.9 GHz, turbo 1.9 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (56th percentile)
49.1% Average
Memory 72.7
1-Core 56.6
2-Core 103
49% 77.3 Pts
4-Core 150
8-Core 152
20% 151 Pts
64-Core 154
10% 154 Pts
Poor: 29%
This bench: 49.1%
Great: 56%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel HD Graphics
HP(103C 80C1) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 20.19.15.4549
Performing way below expectations (6th percentile)
1.25% Terrible
Lighting 0.2
Reflection 1.7
Parallax 3.4
0% 1.77 fps
MRender 3.4
Gravity 2.4
Splatting 5.8
3% 3.87 fps
Poor: 1%
This bench: 1.25%
Great: 3%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
WD Blue 2.5" 750GB-$73
626GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 01.01A01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 54 56 72 73 56 44 MB/s
Performing below expectations (30th percentile)
38.8% Below average
Read 75.7
Write 70.2
Mixed 35.1
SusWrite 59.1
44% 60 MB/s
4K Read 0.4
4K Write 2.1
4K Mixed 0.5
111% 1 MB/s
Poor: 22%
This bench: 38.8%
Great: 62%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M471B1G73EB0-YK0 1x8GB
1 of 2 slots used
8GB SODIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz
Performing as expected (54th percentile)
28.5% Poor
MC Read 9.7
MC Write 10
MC Mixed 8.5
27% 9.4 GB/s
SC Read 8.5
SC Write 8
SC Mixed 9.9
25% 8.8 GB/s
Latency 95.2
42% 95.2 ns
Poor: 16%
This bench: 28.5%
Great: 33%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Notebook Builds (Compare 8,060 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 3%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 43%
Speed boat
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk

System: HP Notebook

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 23% - Poor Total price: $25
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $159Nvidia RTX 4060 $280WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-13600K $210Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $389WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $75
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $370
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback