Today's hottest deals

Dell Latitude E6410

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 24%
Surfboard
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (37th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 63 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith an extremely low single core score, this CPU can barely handle email and light web browsing. Finally, with a gaming score of 27.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very poor.
Graphics1.05% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory6GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 6GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (52%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU. CPU throttled at 47% by Windows. Ensure maximum processor state is set to 100% via Settings > System > Power & sleep > Additional power settings > Change plan settings > Change advanced power settings > Processor power management > Maximum processor state.
Run History
SystemDell Latitude E6410  (all builds)
MotherboardDell 0K42JR
Memory4.2 GB free of 6 GB @ 1.1 GHz
Display1440 x 900 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20130421
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateMar 29 '22 at 23:42
Run Duration161 Seconds
Run User GBR-User
Background CPU 52%
CPU Throttled 47%

 PC Performing below expectations (37th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5 M 540
CPU 1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2.55 GHz, turbo 1.2 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (6th percentile)
27.4% Poor
Memory 46.2
1-Core 20.5
2-Core 34.9
24% 33.9 Pts
4-Core 52
8-Core 53.2
7% 52.6 Pts
64-Core 54.3
3% 54.3 Pts
Poor: 27%
This bench: 27.4%
Great: 48%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia NVS 3100M
Dell(1028 040A) 512MB
Ram: 512MB, Driver: 342.01
Performing as expected (50th percentile)
1.05% Terrible
Lighting 1.1
Reflection 1.2
Parallax 0.4
1% 0.9 fps
MRender 2.9
Gravity 0.5
Splatting 1.6
1% 1.67 fps
Poor: 1%
This bench: 1.05%
Great: 1%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
WD Blue 2.5" 250GB (2009)-$80
190GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 01.01A01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 55 45 62 53 64 65 MB/s
Performing above expectations (82nd percentile)
36.1% Below average
Read 68.4
Write 64.1
Mixed 41.1
SusWrite 57.1
42% 57.7 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 1.2
4K Mixed 0.8
132% 0.83 MB/s
Poor: 13%
This bench: 36.1%
Great: 41%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown EBJ41UF8BCS0-DJ-F 80CE M471B5773CHS-CH9 6GB
1067, 1067 MHz
4096, 2048 MB
Performing way below expectations (10th percentile)
18.1% Very poor
MC Read 6.5
MC Write 5.5
MC Mixed 7.4
18% 6.47 GB/s
SC Read 4
SC Write 3.7
SC Mixed 3.9
11% 3.87 GB/s
Latency 176
23% 176 ns
Poor: 18%
This bench: 18.1%
Great: 39%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Latitude E6410 Builds (Compare 413 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 2%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 41%
Speed boat
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk

System: Dell Latitude E6410

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 49% - Average Total price: $95
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $210Nvidia RTX 4060 $285WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $125
Intel Core i5-12600K $160Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $389WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $80
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $330
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback