Today's hottest deals

HP OMEN by HP Desktop PC 870-2XX

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 61%
Destroyer
Desktop
Desktop 79%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 53%
Yacht
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (28th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 72 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 73.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics80.6% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive38.9% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
High background CPU (29%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemHP OMEN by HP Desktop PC 870-2XX  (all builds)
MotherboardHP 82F1
Memory26.7 GB free of 32 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors, 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20180306
Uptime0 Days
Run DateAug 13 '22 at 21:34
Run Duration297 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU 29%

 PC Performing below expectations (28th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-7700-$140
U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 4 GHz (avg)
Performing below expectations (24th percentile)
73.2% Very good
Memory 76
1-Core 108
2-Core 226
76% 137 Pts
4-Core 379
8-Core 577
59% 478 Pts
64-Core 654
40% 654 Pts
Poor: 63%
This bench: 73.2%
Great: 84%
Graphics Cards Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel HD 630 (Desktop Kaby Lake)
HP(103C 82F1) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 30.0.101.1340
Performing as expected (57th percentile)
4.82% Terrible
Lighting 6.9
Reflection 108
Parallax 0.3
6% 38.5 fps
MRender 7.1
Gravity 6.5
Splatting 0.1
3% 4.57 fps
Poor: 3%
This bench: 4.82%
Great: 7%
Nvidia GTX 1070-$278
HP(103C 82FB) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1911 MHz, MLim: 2002 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 512.95
Performing below potential (66th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
80.6% Excellent
Lighting 99.3
Reflection 109
Parallax 100
81% 103 fps
MRender 95.6
Gravity 98.6
Splatting 97.9
80% 97.4 fps
Poor: 71%
This bench: 80.6%
Great: 88%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Sandisk SD8SB8U-256G-1006 256GB
21GB free (System drive)
Firmware: X4120006
SusWrite @10s intervals: 150 63 50 61 32 60 MB/s
Performing below potential (1st percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
38.9% Below average
Read 224
Write 81
Mixed 85
SusWrite 69.3
25% 115 MB/s
4K Read 16.6
4K Write 35.7
4K Mixed 9.9
57% 20.7 MB/s
DQ Read 304
DQ Write 108
DQ Mixed 134
118% 182 MB/s
Poor: 55%
This bench: 38.9%
Great: 95%
SHGS31-1000GS-2 1TB
788GB free
Firmware: 9000
SusWrite @10s intervals: 23 24 25 25 21 23 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (1st percentile)
33.5% Below average
Read 196
Write 334
Mixed 240
SusWrite 23.6
45% 198 MB/s
4K Read 14.1
4K Write 35.7
4K Mixed 21.7
68% 23.8 MB/s
DQ Read 28.2
DQ Write 95.8
DQ Mixed 40.7
37% 54.9 MB/s
Poor: 66%
This bench: 33.5%
Great: 115%
Sandisk SD7SB3Q128G1001 128GB
119GB free
Firmware: X223
SusWrite @10s intervals: 23 24 25 25 21 22 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (4th percentile)
47.9% Average
Read 305
Write 304
Mixed 194
SusWrite 23.6
46% 207 MB/s
4K Read 25.8
4K Write 54.8
4K Mixed 26.8
102% 35.8 MB/s
DQ Read 32.2
DQ Write 95.9
DQ Mixed 38.7
37% 55.6 MB/s
Poor: 51%
This bench: 47.9%
Great: 93%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 1TB-$30
254GB free
Firmware: HPH4
SusWrite @10s intervals: 163 165 159 162 162 162 MB/s
Performing as expected (51st percentile)
91.5% Outstanding
Read 157
Write 164
Mixed 77.5
SusWrite 162
102% 140 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.1
4K Mixed 0.8
138% 0.87 MB/s
Poor: 55%
This bench: 91.5%
Great: 112%
WD Blue 2.5" 250GB (2009)-$80
4GB free
Firmware: 01.0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 23 24 25 25 21 22 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (6th percentile)
13.2% Very poor
Read 22.2
Write 24.5
Mixed 20.8
SusWrite 23.6
17% 22.8 MB/s
4K Read 0.3
4K Write 1.1
4K Mixed 0.6
100% 0.67 MB/s
Poor: 13%
This bench: 13.2%
Great: 41%
Seagate IronWolf 4TB (2016)-$87
1TB free
Firmware: SC60
SusWrite @10s intervals: 145 152 153 152 153 153 MB/s
Performing as expected (50th percentile)
92.9% Outstanding
Read 173
Write 163
Mixed 70.2
SusWrite 151
102% 139 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 2
4K Mixed 0.8
159% 1.2 MB/s
Poor: 62%
This bench: 92.9%
Great: 108%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown D4U1632160B 2x16GB
2 of 2 slots used
32GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz
Performing below expectations (23rd percentile)
63.7% Good
MC Read 25.2
MC Write 26.7
MC Mixed 19.5
68% 23.8 GB/s
SC Read 10.8
SC Write 16.1
SC Mixed 15
40% 14 GB/s
Latency 88.3
45% 88.3 ns
Poor: 54%
This bench: 63.7%
Great: 100%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical OMEN by HP Desktop PC 870-2XX Builds (Compare 1,663 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 45%
Yacht
Desktop
Desktop 83%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 39%
Jet ski

System: HP OMEN by HP Desktop PC 870-2XX

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 75% - Very good Total price: $395
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $210Nvidia RTX 4060 $285WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $125
Intel Core i5-12600K $155Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $389WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $80
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $330
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback