Average Bench: 23.2% (709th of 1182)

Based on 13,239 user benchmarks.  Devices: BFEBFBFF00020652, 1FABFBFF00020655, BFEBFBFF00020655 Model: Intel(R) Core(TM) i5 CPU M 520 @ 2.40GHz
Poor: 11%Average: 23.2% Great: 27%
Gaming
Gaming 23%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 35%
Sail boat
Workstation
Workstation 15%
Tree trunk

Very poor average bench

The Intel Core i5 M 520 averaged 76.8% lower than the peak scores attained by the group leaders. This isn't a great result which indicates that there are much faster alternatives on the comparison list.

Strengths

Avg. Single Core Mixed Speed 58.2Pts
Avg. Dual Core Mixed Speed 98.8Pts

Very good consistency

The range of scores (95th - 5th percentile) for the Intel Core i5 M 520 is just 16.2%. This is a relatively narrow range which indicates that the Intel Core i5 M 520 performs reasonably consistently under varying real world conditions.

Weaknesses

Avg. Multi Core Mixed Speed 140Pts
Avg. Octa Core Mixed Speed 139Pts
ADVERTISEMENT

Average Bench

(Based on 13,239 samples)
Min Avg Max
24.9 1-Core 58.2 69.6
42.4 2-Core 98.8 124
37.9% 78.5 Pts
Min Avg Max
62.2 4-Core 137 163
68 8-Core 139 163
18.9% 138 Pts
Min Avg Max
69 64-Core 140 163
9.4% 140 Pts
User Benchmarks Bench Normal Heavy Extreme
The fastest CPU (mainstream) averages a speed of 100%
CPU 1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2.4 GHz, turbo 2.65 GHz (avg)
1-Core 70.8
2-Core 116
45% 93.2 Pts
4-Core 160
8-Core 158
22% 159 Pts
64-Core 160
11% 160 Pts
CPU 1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2.4 GHz
1-Core 67
2-Core 119
45% 93.2 Pts
4-Core 160
8-Core 159
22% 159 Pts
64-Core 161
11% 161 Pts
CPU 1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2.4 GHz, turbo 2.55 GHz (avg)
1-Core 65.8
2-Core 111
43% 88.5 Pts
4-Core 149
8-Core 148
20% 148 Pts
64-Core 148
10% 148 Pts
None, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2.4 GHz
1-Core 38.9
2-Core 123
35% 81.1 Pts
4-Core 155
8-Core 138
20% 147 Pts
64-Core 148
10% 148 Pts
None, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2.4 GHz
1-Core 55.2
2-Core 89.7
35% 72.4 Pts
4-Core 127
8-Core 135
18% 131 Pts
64-Core 143
10% 143 Pts
CPU 1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads
Base clock 2.4 GHz, turbo 2.2 GHz (avg)
1-Core 27.2
2-Core 82.6
24% 54.9 Pts
4-Core 124
8-Core 120
17% 122 Pts
64-Core 124
8% 124 Pts
None, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2.4 GHz
1-Core 52.8
2-Core 83.9
33% 68.3 Pts
4-Core 21.1
8-Core 20.7
3% 20.9 Pts
64-Core 35.4
2% 35.4 Pts
13,239 MORE »

 Market Share (See Leaders)

The number of benchmark samples for this model as a percentage of all 19,449,551 CPUs tested.

 Prices

AmazonUS $7032 mins
Send price feedback
Typical Core i5 M 520 Builds (Compare 2,134 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings.
Gaming
Gaming 11%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 30%
Sail boat
Workstation
Workstation 14%
Tree trunk

System: HP EliteBook 8440p

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 34% - Below average Total price: $70

Popular Core i5 M 520 systems:

How Fast Is Your CPU? (Bench your build) Size up your PC in less than a minute.

Welcome to our freeware PC speed test tool. UserBenchmark will test your PC and compare the results to other users with the same components. You can quickly size up your PC, identify hardware problems and explore the best upgrades.

UserBenchmark of the month

How it works

  • - Download and run UserBenchMark.
  • - CPU tests include: integer, floating and string.
  • - GPU tests include: six 3D game simulations.
  • - Drive tests include: read, write, sustained write and mixed IO.
  • - RAM tests include: single/multi core bandwidth and latency.
  • - Reports are generated and presented on userbenchmark.com.
  • - Identify the strongest components in your PC.
  • - See speed test results from other users.
  • - Compare your components to the current market leaders.
  • - Explore your best upgrade options with a virtual PC build.
  • - Compare your in-game FPS to other users with your hardware.
  • - Share your opinion by voting.
Processor Rankings (Price vs Performance) August 2019 CPU Rankings.

We calculate effective speed which measures real world performance for typical gamers and desktop users. Effective speed is adjusted by current prices to yield a value for money rating which is geared towards gamers. Our calculated values are checked against thousands of individual user ratings. The customizable table below combines these factors to bring you the definitive list of top CPUs. [CPUPro]

ADVERTISEMENT

Group Test Results

  • Best user rated - User sentiment trumps benchmarks for this comparison.
  • Best value for money - Value for money is based on real world performance.
  • Fastest real world speed - Real World Speed measures performance for typical consumers.

 Specifications

Essentials

DescriptionIntel® Core™ i5-520M Processor (3M Cache, 2.40 GHz)
Code NameArrandale
Launch DateQ1'10
Processor Numberi5-520M
# of Cores2
# of Threads4
Cache3 MB SmartCache
Instruction Set64-bit
Instruction Set ExtensionsSSE4.1/4.2
Embedded Options AvailableYes
Lithography32 nm
Recommended Price$212.00 - $227.00
Clock Speed2.4 GHz
Max Turbo Frequency2.933 GHz
Bus Speed2.5 GT/s DMI
Max TDP35 W

Graphics

Processor GraphicsIntel® HD Graphics
Graphics Base Frequency500 MHz
# of Displays Supported2
Graphics Max Dynamic Frequency766 MHz
Clear Video HD TechYes
Flexible Display InterfaceYes
Clear Video Tech for MIDYes
Macrovision License RequiredNo

Memory

Max Memory Size8 GB
Memory TypesDDR3 800/1066
Memory Channels2
Memory Bandwidth17.1 GB/s
Physical Address Extensions36-bit
ECC Memory SupportedNo

Expansion Options

PCI Express Revision2.0
PCI Express Configurations1x16
Max # of PCI Express Lanes16

Data Protection

AES New InstructionsYes

Advanced Technologies

Virtualization Tech (VT-x)Yes
Intel 64Yes
Idle StatesYes
Enhanced Intel SpeedStep® TechYes
Thermal Monitoring TechnologiesYes
Turbo Boost Tech1.0
Hyper-Threading TechYes
Virtualization for Directed I/O (VT-d)Yes
VT-x with Extended Page Tables (EPT)Yes
vPro TechYes
Fast Memory AccessYes
Flex Memory AccessYes

Package

Package SizerPGA 37.5mmx 37.5mm, BGA 34mmx28mm
Graphics and IMC Lithography45 nm
Max CPU Configuration1
Sockets SupportedBGA1288, PGA988
Processing Die Size81 mm2
# of Processing Die Transistors382 million
Graphics and IMC Die Size114 mm2
# of Graphics and IMC Die Transistors177 million

Platform Protection

Execute Disable BitYes
Trusted Execution TechYes

 Comments

Added n/a ago.

Good (edit your comment) Add link

2 months ago.

Terrible performance because it's so old


Good

4 months ago.

USA-User is probably referring to his/her mom. Old and bad performance. This is a 10 year old processor. It does everything as well as 10 years ago, like your granddad, that does his gardening work. Sure, there are faster machines. More efficient ones. But it is effective. It does work tasks and browsing. Great for office work. Really good battery performance. Almost vintage style, while still being useful. And: The chip costs less than Fallout 76 original price. It lags not as much as Fallout 76, it looks cool, it just works. 520m win - everyone else lose. 4 stars, because yeah, its old. There are alternatives sure. But if you have one, it is enough for serious office work. Dont expect a gaming or calculating prodigy, expect a solid processor.


Your
opinion?
1182 Processors (Compared) Thousands of user benchmarks compiled into one comparison list.

See how consistently different CPUs perform with varying real world conditions. The charts also illustrate overall performance, popularity and rank.

 Frequently Asked Questions

 Best User Rated

The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-9400F $143AMD RX 580 $172Samsung 850 Evo 250GB $86
AMD Ryzen 5 3600 $198Nvidia GTX 1660 $220Samsung 850 Evo 500GB $103
Intel Core i5-9600K $219AMD RX 5700 XT $400Samsung 850 Pro 256GB $195
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $40Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $75SanDisk Extreme 64GB $128
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $40G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $695SanDisk Extreme 32GB $48
Seagate Barracuda 3TB (2016) $80Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $80SanDisk Extreme 16GB $24
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer Feedback