Today's hottest deals

Average Bench: 40.1% (1085th of 1463)

Based on 23,644 user benchmarks.  Devices: BFEBFBFF00020652, 1FABFBFF00020655, BFEBFBFF00020655 Model: Intel(R) Core(TM) i5 CPU M 520 @ 2.40GHz
Poor: 26%Average: 40.1% Great: 47%
Gaming
Gaming 40%
Speed boat
Desktop
Desktop 46%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 28%
Raft

Below average average bench

The Intel Core i5 M 520 averaged 59.8% lower than the peak scores attained by the group leaders. This isn't a great result which indicates that there are much faster alternatives on the comparison list.

Strengths

Avg. Memory Latency 57.7Pts
Avg. Single Core Speed 56.9Pts

Good consistency

The range of scores (95th - 5th percentile) for the Intel Core i5 M 520 is 20.3%. This is a relatively narrow range which indicates that the Intel Core i5 M 520 performs reasonably consistently under varying real world conditions.

Weaknesses

Avg. Multi Core Speed 136Pts
Avg. Octa Core Speed 135Pts

Average Bench

(Based on 23,644 samples)
Min Avg Max
38.2 Memory 57.7 66.7
23.4 1-Core 56.9 70.8
40.9 2-Core 96.2 126
43% 70.3 Pts
Min Avg Max
56.1 4-Core 131 163
58.1 8-Core 135 163
17.7% 133 Pts
Min Avg Max
58.1 64-Core 136 163
8.4% 136 Pts
User Benchmarks BenchNormalHeavyServer
The fastest CPU (mainstream) averages a speed of 100%
CPU 1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2.4 GHz, turbo 2.55 GHz (avg)
Memory 65.4
1-Core 66.1
2-Core 116
50% 82.5 Pts
4-Core 145
8-Core 144
19% 145 Pts
64-Core 146
9% 146 Pts
U2E1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2.4 GHz, turbo 2.65 GHz (avg)
Memory 63.2
1-Core 58.3
2-Core 96.4
45% 72.6 Pts
4-Core 156
8-Core 153
21% 155 Pts
64-Core 157
10% 157 Pts
CPU 1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2.4 GHz, turbo 2.65 GHz (avg)
Memory 63.7
1-Core 59.9
2-Core 96
46% 73.2 Pts
4-Core 132
8-Core 140
18% 136 Pts
64-Core 137
8% 137 Pts
CPU 1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2.4 GHz, turbo 2.65 GHz (avg)
Memory 65.1
1-Core 59.2
2-Core 106
47% 76.8 Pts
4-Core 124
8-Core 129
17% 127 Pts
64-Core 136
8% 136 Pts
CPU 1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2.4 GHz, turbo 2.6 GHz (avg)
Memory 58.6
1-Core 49.5
2-Core 82.9
40% 63.7 Pts
4-Core 118
8-Core 122
16% 120 Pts
64-Core 122
8% 122 Pts
CPU 1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2.4 GHz, turbo 2.4 GHz (avg)
Memory 56.4
1-Core 47.5
2-Core 82.8
39% 62.2 Pts
4-Core 98.7
8-Core 105
14% 102 Pts
64-Core 91.5
6% 91.5 Pts
CPU 1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2.4 GHz, turbo 1.35 GHz (avg)
Memory 58.2
1-Core 42.8
2-Core 54.6
35% 51.9 Pts
4-Core 64.1
8-Core 61.9
8% 63 Pts
64-Core 60.5
4% 60.5 Pts
CPU 1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2.4 GHz, turbo 2.6 GHz (avg)
Memory 47.3
1-Core 17.5
2-Core 29.2
23% 31.3 Pts
4-Core 42.4
8-Core 48
6% 45.2 Pts
64-Core 31.2
2% 31.2 Pts
U2E1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2.4 GHz, turbo 2.6 GHz (avg)
Memory 33.6
1-Core 53.6
2-Core 85
33% 57.4 Pts
4-Core 67.9
8-Core 66
9% 66.9 Pts
64-Core 69.5
4% 69.5 Pts
23,644 MORE »

 Market Share (See Leaders)

The number of benchmark samples for this model as a percentage of all 68,738,561 CPUs tested

 Prices

If you buy via one of these links, our site may earn a commission

AmazonUS $703 years
Send price feedback
Typical Core i5 M 520 Builds (Compare 315 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 2%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 40%
Speed boat
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk

System: HP EliteBook 8440p

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 49% - Average Total price: $95

Popular Core i5 M 520 systems:

How Fast Is Your CPU? (Bench your build) Size up your PC in less than a minute

Welcome to our PC speed test tool. UserBenchmark will test your PC and compare the results to other users with the same components. You can quickly size up your PC, identify hardware problems and explore the best value for money upgrades.

UserBenchmark of the month

How it works

  • - Download and run UserBenchmark
  • - CPU tests include: integer, floating and string
  • - GPU tests include: six 3D game simulations
  • - Drive tests include: read, write, sustained write and mixed IO
  • - RAM tests include: single/multi core bandwidth and latency
  • - SkillBench (space shooter) tests user input accuracy
  • - Reports are generated and presented on userbenchmark.com
  • - Identify the strongest components in your PC
  • - See speed test results from other users
  • - Compare your components to the current market leaders
  • - Explore your best upgrade options with a virtual PC build
  • - Compare your in-game FPS to other users with your hardware
Processor Rankings (Price vs Performance) October 2024 CPU Rankings

We calculate effective speed which measures real world performance for typical users. Effective speed is adjusted by current prices to yield a value for money rating. Our calculated values are checked against thousands of individual user ratings. The customizable table below combines these factors to bring you the definitive list of top CPUs. [CPUPro]

Group Test Results

  • Best user rated - User sentiment trumps benchmarks for this comparison.
  • Best value for money - Value for money is based on real world performance.
  • Fastest real world speed - Real World Speed measures performance for typical consumers.

 Specifications

Essentials

DescriptionIntel® Core™ i5-520M Processor (3M Cache, 2.40 GHz)
Code NameArrandale
Launch DateQ1'10
Processor Numberi5-520M
# of Cores2
# of Threads4
Cache3 MB SmartCache
Instruction Set64-bit
Instruction Set ExtensionsSSE4.1/4.2
Embedded Options AvailableYes
Lithography32 nm
Recommended Price$212.00 - $227.00
Clock Speed2.4 GHz
Max Turbo Frequency2.933 GHz
Bus Speed2.5 GT/s DMI
Max TDP35 W

Graphics

Processor GraphicsIntel® HD Graphics
Graphics Base Frequency500 MHz
# of Displays Supported2
Graphics Max Dynamic Frequency766 MHz
Clear Video HD TechYes
Flexible Display InterfaceYes
Clear Video Tech for MIDYes
Macrovision License RequiredNo

Memory

Max Memory Size8 GB
Memory TypesDDR3 800/1066
Memory Channels2
Memory Bandwidth17.1 GB/s
Physical Address Extensions36-bit
ECC Memory SupportedNo

Expansion Options

PCI Express Revision2.0
PCI Express Configurations1x16
Max # of PCI Express Lanes16

Data Protection

AES New InstructionsYes

Advanced Technologies

Virtualization Tech (VT-x)Yes
Intel 64Yes
Idle StatesYes
Enhanced Intel SpeedStep® TechYes
Thermal Monitoring TechnologiesYes
Turbo Boost Tech1.0
Hyper-Threading TechYes
Virtualization for Directed I/O (VT-d)Yes
VT-x with Extended Page Tables (EPT)Yes
vPro TechYes
Fast Memory AccessYes
Flex Memory AccessYes

Package

Package SizerPGA 37.5mmx 37.5mm, BGA 34mmx28mm
Graphics and IMC Lithography45 nm
Max CPU Configuration1
Sockets SupportedBGA1288, PGA988
Processing Die Size81 mm2
# of Processing Die Transistors382 million
Graphics and IMC Die Size114 mm2
# of Graphics and IMC Die Transistors177 million

Platform Protection

Execute Disable BitYes
Trusted Execution TechYes

 Comments

Added n/a ago.

Poor (edit your comment) Add link

14 months ago.

Terrible performance because it's so old


Excellent

4 years ago.

It powers my daily driver - a Fujitsu Lifebook E780 laptop from 2010. Works flawlessly paired with an SSD and 8 GB of RAM, but I could use more cores for multitasking. That said, it handles like a champ Office 365 work with Bitdefender antivirus in the background, Google Chrome with multiple tabs open as well as several apps open and docked in the Taskbar. Multiple desktops also. It shows its age when trying to watch Youtube or listen to music while torrenting (audio lags and stutters). I've played games up to Assassin's Creed Black Flag, but nothing newer because of the GPU (Nvidia Geforce 330M). What's frustrating is the fact that, while craving more speed and performance, I realize this 10-year old CPU covers my productivity needs most of the time. Upgrading would be done on a whim, not out of necessity.


Excellent

13 months ago.

pretty nice for an old processor


Good

21 months ago.

In 2020 I bought Panasonic CF-C1 with this cpu. After upgrading hdd to ssd, it works like a champ with Mint Mate. Web pages, youtube, docker, libreoffice - you name it. And yes, it runs windows 10 (I dual-boot it to watch netflix and amazon prime). The only thing that lags is windows update - it can take hours.


Good

15 months ago.

Still daily in use. Lives in my Thinkpad X201, 8GB, SSD (best portable calculating machine I'v ever touched). To be precise, I'm using it to write this comment while doing heavy calculations in the background. Sure, the keyboard gets a bit warm and it takes a bit longer...to be honest, I don't know if you can boot Windows 10 with it.


Excellent

4 years ago.

Esto es de una laptop del 2007 Y le gana a ese i 3 Que vale maas


Good

5 years ago.

USA-User is probably referring to his/her mom. Old and bad performance. This is a 10 year old processor. It does everything as well as 10 years ago, like your granddad, that does his gardening work. Sure, there are faster machines. More efficient ones. But it is effective. It does work tasks and browsing. Great for office work. Really good battery performance. Almost vintage style, while still being useful. And: The chip costs less than Fallout 76 original price. It lags not as much as Fallout 76, it looks cool, it just works. 520m win - everyone else lose. 4 stars, because yeah, its old. There are alternatives sure. But if you have one, it is enough for serious office work. Dont expect a gaming or calculating prodigy, expect a solid processor.


Your
opinion?
1463 Processors (Compared) Thousands of user benchmarks compiled into one comparison list

See how consistently different CPUs perform with varying real world conditions. The charts also illustrate overall performance, popularity and rank.

 Frequently Asked Questions

 Best User Rated

Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $164Nvidia RTX 4060 $299WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $140
Intel Core i5-12400F $112Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $380WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $75
Intel Core i5-13600K $218Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback