Today's hottest deals

HP Compaq dc7100 SFF(PC923A)

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 15%
Surfboard
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (20th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 80 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith an extremely low single core score, this CPU can barely handle email and light web browsing. Finally, with a gaming score of 17.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is terrible.
Graphics0.68% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
MemoryThe RAM on this system should be upgraded to at least 2GB although on 32bit systems 1GB will suffice as a bare minimum.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (100%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemHP Compaq dc7100 SFF(PC923A)  (all builds)
MotherboardHewlett-Packard 097Ch
Memory0.2 GB free of 1.50049 GB @ 0.4 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20050405
Uptime4.2 Days
Run DateMay 18 '20 at 15:15
Run Duration293 Seconds
Run User GBR-User
Background CPU 100%

 PC Performing below expectations (20th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Pentium 4 3.00GHz
XU1 PROCESSOR, 1 CPU, 1 cores, 2 threads
Base clock 3 GHz, turbo 3 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (9th percentile)
17.8% Very poor
Memory 32.5
1-Core 10.7
2-Core 15.9
15% 19.7 Pts
4-Core 19.1
8-Core 22.3
3% 20.7 Pts
64-Core 20.1
1% 20.1 Pts
Poor: 15%
This bench: 17.8%
Great: 36%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GeForce 8400 GS
Gigabyte(1458 34CD) 512MB
Ram: 512MB, Driver: 342.01
Performing above expectations (75th percentile)
0.68% Terrible
Lighting 0.83
Reflection 1.15
Parallax 0.16
1% 0.71 fps
MRender 1.38
Gravity 0.4
Splatting 0.78
1% 0.85 fps
Poor: 0%
This bench: 0.68%
Great: 1%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Maxtor 6Y160M0 164GB-$117
99GB free (System drive)
Firmware: YAR51EW0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 15 22 17 12 9.8 11 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (2nd percentile)
8.07% Terrible
Read 13
Write 41.5
Mixed 18.7
SusWrite 14.5
16% 21.9 MB/s
4K Read 0.4
4K Write 1.8
4K Mixed 0.7
128% 0.97 MB/s
Poor: 15%
This bench: 8.07%
Great: 32%
External USB3.0 500GB
463GB free
Firmware: 0204
SusWrite @10s intervals: 15 18 19 17 16 17 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (4th percentile)
11.1% Very poor
Read 21.7
Write 18.5
Mixed 15.2
SusWrite 16.9
13% 18.1 MB/s
4K Read 0.4
4K Write 0.2
4K Mixed 0.3
54% 0.3 MB/s
Poor: 14%
This bench: 11.1%
Great: 63%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 34GB
null MHz
256, 256, 1024, 33280 MB
Performing way below expectations (11th percentile)
5.12% Terrible
MC Read 1.6
MC Write 1.8
MC Mixed 1.7
5% 1.7 GB/s
SC Read 0.1
SC Write 0.1
SC Mixed 0.1
0% 0.1 GB/s
Latency 240
17% 240 ns
Poor: 5%
This bench: 5.12%
Great: 47%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $169Nvidia RTX 4060 $295WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $345WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $215Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback