HP Notebook

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 4%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 33%
Sail boat
Workstation
Workstation 4%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (38th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 62 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a relatively low single core score, this CPU can handle email, light web browsing and basic audio/video playback, but it will struggle to handle CPU intensive tasks. Finally, with a gaming score of 33.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is poor.
Graphics2.26% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive58.9% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (40%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
2 years ago, 2 years ago.
SystemHP Notebook  (all builds)
MotherboardHP 80CC
Memory12.6 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1366 x 768 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20190517
Uptime0 Days
Run DateMar 13 '22 at 16:43
Run Duration166 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU 40%

 PC Performing below expectations (38th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD A8-7410 APU (2015 M.Ca)
Socket FT3b, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2.2 GHz, turbo 2.3 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (60th percentile)
33.4% Below average
Memory 44.2
1-Core 37.9
2-Core 75.4
32% 52.5 Pts
4-Core 132
8-Core 131
18% 132 Pts
64-Core 130
8% 130 Pts
Poor: 16%
This bench: 33.4%
Great: 41%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD Radeon R5
HP(103C 80CC) 1GB
Driver: aticfx64.dll Ver. 15.201.1101.0
Performing as expected (53rd percentile)
2.26% Terrible
Lighting 2.4
Reflection 4.7
Parallax 3.8
2% 3.63 fps
MRender 2.9
Gravity 2.7
Splatting 4.4
3% 3.33 fps
Poor: 1%
This bench: 2.26%
Great: 2%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Klevv NEO N400 SSD 120GB
79GB free (System drive)
Firmware: T1120A0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 302 122 124 123 123 122 MB/s
Performing below expectations (29th percentile)
58.9% Above average
Read 414
Write 316
Mixed 326
SusWrite 153
68% 302 MB/s
4K Read 25.1
4K Write 54.8
4K Mixed 17.7
90% 32.5 MB/s
DQ Read 129
DQ Write 162
DQ Mixed 30.2
55% 107 MB/s
Poor: 39%
This bench: 58.9%
Great: 85%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown S3A8G93-16GBJN3A00 2x8GB
2 of 2 slots used
16GB SODIMM DDR3 1600 MHz clocked @ 800 MHz
Performing below potential (11th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
19.2% Very poor
MC Read 8
MC Write 4.8
MC Mixed 6.8
19% 6.53 GB/s
SC Read 5.9
SC Write 5
SC Mixed 7.2
17% 6.03 GB/s
Latency 184
22% 184 ns
Poor: 19%
This bench: 19.2%
Great: 56%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Notebook Builds (Compare 7,874 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 3%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 43%
Speed boat
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk

System: HP Notebook

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 21% - Poor Total price: $28
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $164Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $149
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $245Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $359
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback