Notebook W35xSTQ_370ST

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 11%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 68%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 9%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (75th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 25 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 70.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics12.2% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
SystemNotebook W35xSTQ_370ST  (all builds)
MotherboardNotebook W35xSTQ_370ST
Memory11 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors, 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors,
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20130820
Uptime2.3 Days
Run DateMar 11 '19 at 00:50
Run Duration109 Seconds
Run User SGP-User
Background CPU1%

 PC Performing above expectations (75th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-4700MQ-$209
SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 2.4 GHz, turbo 2.85 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (94th percentile)
70.3% Very good
Memory 83.9
1-Core 96.7
2-Core 191
72% 124 Pts
4-Core 315
8-Core 402
46% 358 Pts
64-Core 398
25% 398 Pts
Poor: 32%
This bench: 70.3%
Great: 71%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 765M
Clevo(1558 3537) 2GB
Driver: nvldumdx.dll Ver. 22.21.13.8205
Performing as expected (41st percentile)
12.2% Very poor
Lighting 16.9
Reflection 15.1
Parallax 19.6
14% 17.2 fps
MRender 17.9
Gravity 20.4
Splatting 0.09
9% 12.8 fps
Poor: 11%
This bench: 12.2%
Great: 14%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
WD Black 2.5" 500GB (2011)-$50
82GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 01.01A01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 82 82 58 98 92 108 MB/s
Performing above expectations (69th percentile)
56.2% Above average
Read 109
Write 117
Mixed 75.2
SusWrite 86.7
71% 96.9 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 2.6
4K Mixed 1
193% 1.47 MB/s
Poor: 24%
This bench: 56.2%
Great: 65%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown S3A8G93-16GBJN3A00 2x8GB
2 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz
Performing way above expectations (95th percentile)
56.2% Above average
MC Read 21.4
MC Write 20.7
MC Mixed 17
56% 19.7 GB/s
SC Read 13.7
SC Write 17.6
SC Mixed 17.5
46% 16.3 GB/s
Latency 73.6
54% 73.6 ns
Poor: 19%
This bench: 56.2%
Great: 56%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical W35xSTQ_370ST Builds (Compare 95 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 7%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 56%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 6%
Tree trunk

System: Notebook W35xSTQ_370ST

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 38% - Below average Total price: $384
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $164Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $149
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $245Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $359
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback