Today's hottest

Amazon Ebay

deals

CPU GPU SSD HDD USB RAM MBD

TEST
YOUR PC

ADD TO PC
BUILD

HP Compaq 8000 Elite CMT PC

Performance Results


Gaming 4% Tree trunk	Desktop 35% Sail boat	Workstation 4% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing way below expectations (12th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 88 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With a relatively low single core score, this CPU can handle email, light web browsing and basic audio/video playback, but it will struggle to handle CPU intensive tasks. Finally, with a gaming score of 34.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is poor.
Graphics	2.89% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	45.5% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 16GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Very high background CPU (100%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

System	HP Compaq 8000 Elite CMT PC (all builds)
Motherboard	Hewlett-Packard 3647h
Memory	5.2 GB free of 16.0039 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20091022
Uptime	0.2 Days
Run Date	Mar 03 '22 at 04:52
Run Duration	328 Seconds
Run User	SGP-User
Background CPU	100%

PC Performing way below expectations (12^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core2 Duo E8600-$180 6,109 User benchmarks, average bench 44% XU1 PROCESSOR, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads Base clock 3.35 GHz, turbo 3.1 GHz (avg) Performing way below expectations (7^th percentile)	34.5% Below average	Memory 60.7 1-Core 15 2-Core 60.9 30% 45.5 Pts	4-Core 49.6 8-Core 60.6 7% 55.1 Pts	64-Core 62.7 4% 62.7 Pts
Poor: 35% ↑ This bench: 34.5% Great: 49%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GeForce GT 630 60,212 User benchmarks, average bench 4% HP(103C 0936) 2GB CLim: 875 MHz, MLim: 445 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 472.98 Performing below expectations (31^st percentile)	2.89% Terrible	Lighting 3.6 Reflection 6.6 Parallax 4.6 3% 4.93 fps	MRender 5.1 Gravity 0.2 Splatting 4.6 3% 3.3 fps
Poor: 3% ↑ This bench: 2.89% Great: 5%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
MK0400GCTZA 400GB 102 User benchmarks, average bench 89% 175GB free (System drive) Firmware: 5DV1HPG4 SusWrite @10s intervals: 93 78 84 76 90 98 MB/s Relative performance (0^th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable	45.5% Average	Read 188 Write 223 Mixed 207 SusWrite 86.7 40% 176 MB/s	4K Read 19.9 4K Write 40.3 4K Mixed 26.9 86% 29 MB/s	DQ Read 148 DQ Write 109 DQ Mixed 121 92% 126 MB/s
Poor: 63% ↑ This bench: 45.5% Great: 103%
WD Blue 3TB (2015)-$90 75,644 User benchmarks, average bench 71% 991GB free Firmware: 80.00A80 SusWrite @10s intervals: 70 74 78 73 87 94 MB/s Performing way below expectations (19^th percentile)	55.4% Above average	Read 114 Write 105 Mixed 74.7 SusWrite 79.2 69% 93 MB/s	4K Read 0.7 4K Write 2.2 4K Mixed 0.8 159% 1.23 MB/s
Poor: 46% ↑ This bench: 55.4% Great: 96%
WD Red 4TB (2013)-$85 55,507 User benchmarks, average bench 75% 251GB free Firmware: 82.00A82 SusWrite @10s intervals: 71 76 81 74 89 96 MB/s Performing below expectations (22^nd percentile)	58.5% Above average	Read 122 Write 105 Mixed 73.1 SusWrite 81.1 70% 95.5 MB/s	4K Read 0.8 4K Write 2.5 4K Mixed 1 191% 1.43 MB/s
Poor: 46% ↑ This bench: 58.5% Great: 100%
Seagate Desktop HDD 4TB (2013)-$80 67,711 User benchmarks, average bench 77% 450GB free Firmware: CC54 SusWrite @10s intervals: 85 77 84 73 90 98 MB/s Performing way below expectations (8^th percentile)	52.7% Above average	Read 99.1 Write 71.9 Mixed 62.1 SusWrite 84.5 59% 79.4 MB/s	4K Read 0.6 4K Write 1.5 4K Mixed 0.8 142% 0.97 MB/s
Poor: 46% ↑ This bench: 52.7% Great: 96%
Seagate Desktop HDD 4TB (2013)-$80 67,711 User benchmarks, average bench 77% 1.5TB free Firmware: CC54 SusWrite @10s intervals: 41 36 34 30 35 34 MB/s Performing way below expectations (11^th percentile)	56.2% Above average	Read 161 Write 105 Mixed 61.2 SusWrite 35 66% 90.6 MB/s	4K Read 0.6 4K Write 1.6 4K Mixed 0.8 144% 1 MB/s
Poor: 46% ↑ This bench: 56.2% Great: 96%
ST3000DM 001-1ER166 3TB 12 User benchmarks, average bench 42% 582GB free, PID 2775 Operating at USB 2.1 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 17 16 16 15 17 17 MB/s Performing way below expectations (12^th percentile)	12.8% Very poor	Read 26.2 Write 24.6 Mixed 21.5 SusWrite 16.5 30% 22.2 MB/s	4K Read 0.7 4K Write 1.7 4K Mixed 0.9 91% 1.1 MB/s
Poor: 13% ↑ This bench: 12.8% Great: 62%
WDC WD30 EZRZ-00Z5HB0 3TB 20 User benchmarks, average bench 35% 339GB free, PID 2775 Operating at USB 2.1 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 2.3 3.4 3.1 3.3 2.6 3 MB/s Performing way below expectations (6^th percentile)	11.6% Very poor	Read 32 Write 25.4 Mixed 25 SusWrite 2.9 27% 21.3 MB/s	4K Read 0.8 4K Write 2 4K Mixed 0.9 102% 1.23 MB/s
Poor: 16% ↑ This bench: 11.6% Great: 56%
JMicron Generic DISK04 1TB 14 User benchmarks, average bench 30% 306GB free, PID 0567 Operating at USB 2.1 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 0.3 0.6 0.7 0.8 0.4 0.3 MB/s Performing below expectations (21^st percentile)	11.4% Very poor	Read 32.1 Write 25.3 Mixed 25.4 SusWrite 0.5 26% 20.8 MB/s	4K Read 0.8 4K Write 2.1 4K Mixed 0.8 102% 1.23 MB/s
Poor: 10% ↑ This bench: 11.4% Great: 39%
JMicron Generic DISK03 1TB 32 User benchmarks, average bench 32% 169GB free, PID 0567 Operating at USB 2.1 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 0.1 0.1 0.4 0.2 0 MB/s Performing way below expectations (6^th percentile)	8.87% Terrible	Read 32.5 Write 25.6 Mixed 9 SusWrite 0.1 19% 16.8 MB/s	4K Read 0.6 4K Write 1.3 4K Mixed 0.8 74% 0.9 MB/s
Poor: 9% ↑ This bench: 8.87% Great: 56%
JMicron Generic DISK02 2TB 54 User benchmarks, average bench 32% 773GB free, PID 0567 Operating at USB 2.1 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 2.7 3 2.9 3.1 2.5 2.6 MB/s Performing way below expectations (7^th percentile)	10.6% Very poor	Read 29.9 Write 24.5 Mixed 22.8 SusWrite 2.8 25% 20 MB/s	4K Read 0.5 4K Write 1.8 4K Mixed 0.8 90% 1.03 MB/s
Poor: 11% ↑ This bench: 10.6% Great: 53%
JMicron Generic DISK01 1TB 95 User benchmarks, average bench 46% 290GB free, PID 0567 Operating at USB 2.1 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 15 15 14 16 17 18 MB/s Performing way below expectations (12^th percentile)	13.7% Very poor	Read 31.2 Write 23.9 Mixed 24.5 SusWrite 16.1 31% 23.9 MB/s	4K Read 0.6 4K Write 1.8 4K Mixed 0.7 87% 1.03 MB/s
Poor: 10% ↑ This bench: 13.7% Great: 75%
JMicron Generic DISK00 2TB 130 User benchmarks, average bench 41% 1TB free, PID 0567 Operating at USB 2.1 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 0.7 0.3 0.4 0.5 0.2 0.2 MB/s Performing way below expectations (4^th percentile)	8.94% Terrible	Read 32.2 Write 25.7 Mixed 25.7 SusWrite 0.4 26% 21 MB/s	4K Read 0.8 4K Write 1.3 4K Mixed 0.7 71% 0.93 MB/s
Poor: 11% ↑ This bench: 8.94% Great: 75%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown ID:80 2C 16JTF51264AZ-1G4D ID:80 2C 16JTF51264AZ-1G4D ID:80 2C 16JTF51264AZ-1G4D ID:80 2C 16JTF51264AZ-1G4D 52GB 20 User benchmarks, average bench 32% 1333, 1333, 1333, 1333, 0 MHz 4096, 4096, 4096, 4096, 36864 MB Performing way below expectations (5^th percentile)	14.8% Very poor	MC Read 5.3 MC Write 4.9 MC Mixed 4.2 14% 4.8 GB/s	SC Read 2.8 SC Write 4 SC Mixed 3.5 10% 3.43 GB/s	Latency 126 32% 126 ns
Poor: 18% ↑ This bench: 14.8% Great: 43%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical Compaq 8000 Elite CMT PC Builds (Compare 328 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 4%

Tree trunk

Desktop 40%

Speed boat

Workstation 4%

Tree trunk

System: HP Compaq 8000 Elite CMT PC

CPU
Core2 Duo E8400Intel $46Bench 40%, 68,540 samples	98x
Core2 Duo E8500Intel $110Bench 42%, 18,841 samples	50x
Core2 Quad Q8400Intel $94Bench 45%, 18,432 samples	32x

GPU
Q45/Q43 Express ChipsetIntelBench 0%, 16,152 samples	70x
GeForce GT 710NvidiaBench 3%, 187,161 samples	31x
GT 1030NvidiaBench 14%, 185,384 samples	21x

SSD
A400 240GBKingston $25Bench 66%, 424,288 samples	6x
RTOTJ128VGD2EYX 128GBBench 54%, 1,124 samples	5x
870 EVO 500GBSamsung $53Bench 104%, 60,851 samples	5x

RAM
ID:80 CE M378B5673FH0-CH9 ID:80 CE M378B5673FH0-CH9 40GBUnknownBench 25%, 680 samples	7x
ID:80 CE M378B5673EH1-CH9 ID:80 CE M378B5673EH1-CH9 40GBUnknownBench 22%, 367 samples	7x
ID:80 AD HMT125U6TFR8C-H9 ID:80 AD HMT125U6TFR8C-H9 40GBUnknownBench 25%, 540 samples	5x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 51% - Above average

Total price: $71

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-12400F $111	Nvidia RTX 4060 $290	WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $130
Intel Core i5-12600K $164	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $389	WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $210	Nvidia RTX 4070 $500	Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $389