Today's hottest

Amazon Ebay

deals

CPU GPU SSD HDD USB RAM MBD

TEST
YOUR PC

ADD TO PC
BUILD

Samsung 300E5EV/300E4EV/270E5EV/270E4EV

Performance Results


Gaming 2% Tree trunk	Desktop 30% Raft	Workstation 2% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (27th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 73 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With a relatively low single core score, this CPU can handle email, light web browsing and basic audio/video playback, but it will struggle to handle CPU intensive tasks. Finally, with a gaming score of 30.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is poor.
Graphics	0.82% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	39.6% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory	4GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 4GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 15 years and 3 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.

Very high background CPU (100%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

System	Samsung 300E5EV/300E4EV/270E5EV/270E4EV (all builds)
Motherboard	SAMSUNG NP300E4E-A07CL
Memory	0.1 GB free of 4 GB @ 1.1 GHz
Display	1366 x 768 - 32 Bit colores
OS	Windows 7
BIOS Date	20130503
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Sep 15 '19 at 05:23
Run Duration	197 Seconds
Run User	CHL-User
Background CPU	100%

PC Performing below expectations (27^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Celeron 847-$259 3,990 User benchmarks, average bench 34% CPU Socket - U3E1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads Base clock 1.1 GHz Performing below expectations (29^th percentile)	30.4% Below average	Memory 55 1-Core 14.6 2-Core 35.2 26% 34.9 Pts	4-Core 35.6 8-Core 40.2 5% 37.9 Pts	64-Core 51.4 3% 51.4 Pts
Poor: 19% ↑ This bench: 30.4% Great: 41%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Intel HD Graphics (G2 Pentium/Celeron 1.1/1.15 GHz) 45,735 User benchmarks, average bench 1% Sanyo(144D C708) 1.8GB Driver: igdumd64.dll Ver. 9.17.10.2875 Performing as expected (59^th percentile)	0.82% Terrible	Lighting 0.8 Reflection 1.08 Parallax 0.69 1% 0.85 fps	MRender 1.33 Gravity 1.4 Splatting 1.48 1% 1.4 fps
Poor: 0% ↑ This bench: 0.82% Great: 1%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Crucial BX500 480GB-$35 83,298 User benchmarks, average bench 63% 430GB free (System drive) Firmware: M6C SusWrite @10s intervals: 53 17 30 33 19 33 MB/s Performing below potential (13^th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable	39.6% Below average	Read 225 Write 24.4 Mixed 239 SusWrite 30.6 29% 130 MB/s	4K Read 20 4K Write 24.2 4K Mixed 19.7 68% 21.3 MB/s	DQ Read 147 DQ Write 195 DQ Mixed 30.6 62% 124 MB/s
Poor: 35% ↑ This bench: 39.6% Great: 92%
Kingston DataTraveler 2.0 16GB 15,750 User benchmarks, average bench 5% 12GB free, PID 6545 Operating at USB 2.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 2.7 1.7 2.8 2.5 2.9 2.9 MB/s Performing way below expectations (9^th percentile)	2.43% Terrible	Read 10.2 Write 5.9 Mixed 4.4 SusWrite 2.5 7% 5.75 MB/s	4K Read 1.7 4K Write 0 4K Mixed 0.1 10% 0.6 MB/s
Poor: 3% ↑ This bench: 2.43% Great: 6%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Samsung M471B5773EB0-CK0 M471B5673FH0-CF8 4GB 3 User benchmarks, average bench 17% 1067, 1067 MHz 2048, 2048 MB Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples	24.8% Poor	MC Read 9.3 MC Write 9.3 MC Mixed 9.7 27% 9.43 GB/s	SC Read 3.3 SC Write 6 SC Mixed 0.1 9% 3.13 GB/s	Latency 143 28% 143 ns
Poor: 12% ↑ This bench: 24.8% Great: 25%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical 300E5EV/300E4EV/270E5EV/270E4EV Builds (Compare 169 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 2%

Tree trunk

Desktop 49%

Yacht

Workstation 2%

Tree trunk

System: Samsung 300E5EV/300E4EV/270E5EV/270E4EV

CPU
Core i3-3120MIntel $100Bench 50%, 14,372 samples	60x
Celeron 847Intel $259Bench 34%, 3,990 samples	46x
Core i5-3230MIntel $100Bench 49%, 61,311 samples	24x

GPU
HD 4000 (Mobile 1.25 GHz)IntelBench 3%, 409,110 samples	96x
HD Graphics (G2 Pentium/Celeron 1.1/1.15 GHz)IntelBench 1%, 45,735 samples	49x
HD Graphics (G3 Pentium/Celeron 1.0/1.1 GHz)IntelBench 1%, 28,701 samples	16x

SSD
A400 240GBKingston $25Bench 66%, 424,288 samples	4x
860 Evo 250GBSamsung $52Bench 104%, 296,814 samples	4x
870 EVO 500GBSamsung $53Bench 104%, 60,851 samples	4x

RAM
M471B5273EB0-CK0 1x4GBSamsungBench 28%, 3,287 samples	20x
M471B5273CH0-YK0 1x4GBSamsungBench 26%, 3,608 samples	16x
M471B5173BH0-CK0 1x4GBSamsungBench 26%, 3,473 samples	8x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 58% - Above average

Total price: $125

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $169	Nvidia RTX 4060 $295	WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $111	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $345	WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $225	Nvidia RTX 4070 $500	Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $340