Today's hottest deals

Komplett PC

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 45%
Yacht
Desktop
Desktop 73%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 34%
Sail boat
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (25th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 75 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 55.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics76% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
High background CPU (30%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemKomplett PC  (all builds)
MotherboardASUSTeK TUF B360-PRO GAMING
Memory3.3 GB free of 8 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit färger
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20190403
Uptime0.4 Days
Run DateFeb 03 '22 at 22:27
Run Duration176 Seconds
Run User SWE-User
Background CPU 30%
Watch Gameplay How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing below expectations (25th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-9400F-$85
LGA1151, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 6 threads
Base clock 2.9 GHz, turbo 3.95 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (1st percentile)
55.8% Above average
Memory 83.2
1-Core 104
2-Core 166
70% 118 Pts
4-Core 166
8-Core 173
22% 169 Pts
64-Core 171
11% 171 Pts
Poor: 72%
This bench: 55.8%
Great: 91%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1660-Ti-$143
Asus(1043 86C8) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 2145 MHz, MLim: 3000 MHz, Ram: 6GB, Driver: 456.71
Performing below potential (58th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
76% Very good
Lighting 96.9
Reflection 88.7
Parallax 86.4
79% 90.7 fps
MRender 95.6
Gravity 88.7
Splatting 76.7
70% 87 fps
Poor: 70%
This bench: 76%
Great: 81%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Kingston A1000 NVMe PCIe M.2 480GB-$175
21GB free (System drive)
Firmware: E8FK11.T Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 525
Write 521
Mixed 443
111% 496 MB/s
4K Read 19
4K Write 62
4K Mixed 27.4
97% 36.1 MB/s
DQ Read 886
DQ Write 494
DQ Mixed 663
500% 681 MB/s
Poor: 98% Great: 162%
Kingston SA400S37960G 960GB
129GB free
Firmware: S3402101
SusWrite @10s intervals: 147 285 327 153 128 40 MB/s
Performing below expectations (35th percentile)
53.9% Above average
Read 420
Write 349
Mixed 97.4
SusWrite 180
58% 261 MB/s
4K Read 16.8
4K Write 51
4K Mixed 12.1
68% 26.6 MB/s
DQ Read 166
DQ Write 113
DQ Mixed 47.5
60% 109 MB/s
Poor: 41%
This bench: 53.9%
Great: 102%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
HyperX Fury DDR4 2666 C15 2x4GB-$47
2 of 4 slots used
8GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2666 MHz
Performing way below expectations (5th percentile)
58.4% Above average
MC Read 20.3
MC Write 19.3
MC Mixed 20.6
57% 20.1 GB/s
SC Read 11.8
SC Write 24.6
SC Mixed 21.1
55% 19.2 GB/s
Latency 74.8
54% 74.8 ns
Poor: 58%
This bench: 58.4%
Great: 98%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical PC Builds (Compare 3,596 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 126%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 91%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 105%
UFO

System: Komplett PC

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 94% - Outstanding Total price: $550
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $210Nvidia RTX 4060 $285WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $125
Intel Core i5-12600K $160Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $389WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $80
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $330
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback