Today's hottest deals

Asus H81M-E

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 7%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 71%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 7%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (77th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 23 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 80.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics0.98% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive83.8% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
MotherboardAsus H81M-E  (all builds)
Memory12.8 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1680 x 1050 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20140808
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJan 30 '22 at 23:44
Run Duration156 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU0%

 PC Performing above expectations (77th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-4790-$104
SOCKET 1150, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 3.8 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (98th percentile)
80.9% Excellent
Memory 87.8
1-Core 112
2-Core 220
80% 140 Pts
4-Core 402
8-Core 559
61% 481 Pts
64-Core 560
35% 560 Pts
Poor: 58%
This bench: 80.9%
Great: 80%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GeForce 210
Asus(1043 848E) 1GB
Ram: 1GB, Driver: 342.01
Performing as expected (50th percentile)
0.98% Terrible
Lighting 1.1
Reflection 0.5
Parallax 0.4
1% 0.67 fps
MRender 2.2
Gravity 0.5
Splatting 1.5
1% 1.4 fps
Poor: 1%
This bench: 0.98%
Great: 1%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Corsair Force LX 128GB-$144
79GB free (System drive)
Firmware: N0307A
SusWrite @10s intervals: 145 148 140 147 147 147 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (96th percentile)
83.8% Excellent
Read 505
Write 147
Mixed 209
SusWrite 146
55% 252 MB/s
4K Read 29.8
4K Write 98.7
4K Mixed 39.5
148% 56 MB/s
DQ Read 266
DQ Write 148
DQ Mixed 153
128% 189 MB/s
Poor: 53%
This bench: 83.8%
Great: 84%
Toshiba DT01ACA200 2TB-$56
1.5TB free
Firmware: MX4OABB0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 158 161 160 161 163 163 MB/s
Performing above expectations (75th percentile)
99% Outstanding
Read 184
Write 194
Mixed 28.8
SusWrite 161
102% 142 MB/s
4K Read 1.2
4K Write 2.3
4K Mixed 0.6
159% 1.37 MB/s
Poor: 49%
This bench: 99%
Great: 108%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M378B1G73DB0-CK0 2x8GB
2 of 2 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz
Performing above expectations (66th percentile)
57.2% Above average
MC Read 20.5
MC Write 20.7
MC Mixed 16.7
55% 19.3 GB/s
SC Read 17.5
SC Write 21.8
SC Mixed 20
56% 19.8 GB/s
Latency 69.8
57% 69.8 ns
Poor: 36%
This bench: 57.2%
Great: 60%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical H81M-E Builds (Compare 1,878 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 9%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 60%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 8%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: Asus H81M-E - $311

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 62% - Good Total price: $545
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $159Nvidia RTX 4060 $280WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-13600K $210Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $389WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $84
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $370
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback