Performance Results


Gaming 3% Tree trunk	Desktop 30% Sail boat	Workstation 3% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (31st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 69 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With a relatively low single core score, this CPU can handle email, light web browsing and basic audio/video playback, but it will struggle to handle CPU intensive tasks. Finally, with a gaming score of 30.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is poor.
Graphics	0.57% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	33.3% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory	8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Very high background CPU (65%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

PC Performing below expectations (31^st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i3 M 330 6 User benchmarks, average bench 36% N/A, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads Base clock 2.15 GHz, turbo 1.6 GHz (avg) Performing way below expectations (8^th percentile)	30.6% Below average	Memory 46 1-Core 36.2 2-Core 57.1 30% 46.4 Pts	4-Core 87.1 8-Core 102 12% 94.7 Pts	64-Core 91.3 6% 91.3 Pts
Poor: 31% ↑ This bench: 30.6% Great: 41%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Intel HD Graphics (Arrandale 0.667/0.766 GHz) 99,513 User benchmarks, average bench 1% Sony(104D 9071) 3.8GB Driver: igdumd64.dll Ver. 8.15.10.2900 Performing above expectations (75^th percentile)	0.57% Terrible	Lighting 0.6 Reflection 0.85 Parallax 0.59 0% 0.68 fps	MRender 0.95 Gravity 0.47 Splatting 1.17 1% 0.86 fps
Poor: 0% ↑ This bench: 0.57% Great: 1%

Drive	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Kingston HyperX 3K 240GB-$70 27,495 User benchmarks, average bench 81% 181GB free (System drive) Firmware: 521ABBF0 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Relative performance (0^th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 95 95 4903998 (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (09) Power-on hours count 100 100 26250840113203 (0C) Power cycle count 100 100 43 (AB) Unknown 0 0 0 (AC) Unknown 0 0 0 (AE) Unknown 0 0 5 (B1) Unknown 0 0 0 (B5) Unknown 0 0 0 (B6) Unknown 0 0 0 (BB) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (BD) vendor-specific 32 39 81606934560 (C2) HDA temperature 32 39 81606934560 (C3) Hardware ECC recovered 120 120 4903998 (C4) Reallocation count 100 100 0 (C9) Soft read error rate 120 120 4903998 (CC) Soft ECC correction 120 120 4903998 (E6) GMR head amplitude 100 100 100 (E7) Temperature 100 100 0 (E9) Unknown 0 0 181 (EA) Unknown 0 0 216 (F1) Unknown 0 0 216 (F2) Unknown 0 0 152	33.3% Below average	Read 172 Write 160 Mixed 167 37% 166 MB/s	4K Read 13 4K Write 17 4K Mixed 11.7 44% 13.9 MB/s	DQ Read 78.8 DQ Write 69.5 DQ Mixed 36.9 38% 61.7 MB/s
Poor: 59% ↑ This bench: 33.3% Great: 94%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown 2x4GB 424,126 User benchmarks, average bench 39% 2 of 2 slots used 8GB SODIMM DDR3 Performing way below expectations (10^th percentile)	17.9% Very poor	MC Read 5.8 MC Write 5.5 MC Mixed 7.5 18% 6.27 GB/s	SC Read 4.4 SC Write 3.9 SC Mixed 4.9 13% 4.4 GB/s	Latency 176 23% 176 ns
Poor: 17% ↑ This bench: 17.9% Great: 65%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM