Today's hottest deals

Lenovo 309342U

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 26%
Raft
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing way below expectations (17th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 83 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a relatively low single core score, this CPU can handle email, light web browsing and basic audio/video playback, but it will struggle to handle CPU intensive tasks. Finally, with a gaming score of 28.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very poor.
Graphics0.38% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory6GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 6GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (62%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
2 years ago, 2 years ago.
SystemLenovo 309342U  (all builds)
MotherboardLENOVO 309342U
Memory3.1 GB free of 6 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1280 x 800 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20120426
Uptime0 Days
Run DateSep 15 '22 at 08:33
Run Duration212 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU 62%

 PC Performing way below expectations (17th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7 L 620
None, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2 GHz, turbo 2.05 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (5th percentile)
28.1% Poor
Memory 42.6
1-Core 43.5
2-Core 62.9
31% 49.7 Pts
4-Core 78.5
8-Core 91.1
11% 84.8 Pts
64-Core 87
5% 87 Pts
Poor: 30%
This bench: 28.1%
Great: 44%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel HD Graphics (Arrandale 0.667/0.766 GHz)
Legend(17AA 215A) 2.8GB
Driver: igdumd64.dll Ver. 8.15.10.2900
Performing as expected (50th percentile)
0.38% Terrible
Lighting 0.3
Reflection 0.7
Parallax 0.4
0% 0.47 fps
MRender 0.6
Gravity 1.1
Splatting 0.7
1% 0.8 fps
Poor: 0%
This bench: 0.38%
Great: 1%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Toshiba MQ04ABF100 1TB
219GB free (System drive)
Firmware: JU0C0J
SusWrite @10s intervals: 27 13 8.5 16 14 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (2nd percentile)
16.4% Very poor
Read 42
Write 28
Mixed 5
SusWrite 15.1
16% 22.5 MB/s
4K Read 0
4K Write 0.7
4K Mixed 0.2
35% 0.3 MB/s
Poor: 27%
This bench: 16.4%
Great: 79%
WD My Book 1140 2TB
790GB free, PID 1140
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 20 24 23 22 23 24 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (5th percentile)
11.9% Very poor
Read 28.2
Write 19.2
Mixed 18.2
SusWrite 22.6
29% 22.1 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 0.9
4K Mixed 0.5
50% 0.67 MB/s
Poor: 14%
This bench: 11.9%
Great: 49%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 16KTF51264HZ-1G6M1 80CE M471B5773DH0-CH9 6GB
1600, 1334 MHz
4096, 2048 MB
Performing below expectations (25th percentile)
18.9% Very poor
MC Read 6.2
MC Write 6.4
MC Mixed 8.1
20% 6.9 GB/s
SC Read 2.8
SC Write 4
SC Mixed 4.3
11% 3.7 GB/s
Latency 191
21% 191 ns
Poor: 16%
This bench: 18.9%
Great: 43%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical 309342U Builds (Compare 1 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete

System: Lenovo 309342U

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $169Nvidia RTX 4060 $295WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $345WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $225Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback