Performance Results


Gaming 34% Sail boat	Desktop 78% Battleship	Workstation 28% Raft


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (28th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 72 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 66.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics	44.5% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	184% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Very high background CPU (68%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

PC Performing below expectations (28^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Xeon E5-1620 v4 3,243 User benchmarks, average bench 77% CPU0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads Base clock 3.5 GHz, turbo 3.55 GHz (avg) Performing way below expectations (6^th percentile)	66.7% Good	Memory 80.7 1-Core 99.7 2-Core 172 69% 118 Pts	4-Core 300 8-Core 333 42% 317 Pts	64-Core 471 29% 471 Pts
Poor: 67% ↑ This bench: 66.7% Great: 84%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1650-$155 259,091 User benchmarks, average bench 43% MSI(1462 3870) ≥ 4GB CLim: 2145 MHz, MLim: 3000 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 497.29 Performing way above expectations (90^th percentile)	44.5% Average	Lighting 57.9 Reflection 55.4 Parallax 52.5 47% 55.3 fps	MRender 57.2 Gravity 52.3 Splatting 39 39% 49.5 fps
Poor: 39% ↑ This bench: 44.5% Great: 46%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung 980 Pro NVMe PCIe M.2 1TB-$102 276,089 User benchmarks, average bench 394% 821GB free (System drive) Firmware: 3B2QGXA7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s SusWrite @10s intervals: 1012 1071 1030 969 1192 1267 MB/s Performing way below expectations (2^nd percentile)	184% Outstanding	Read 1,712 Write 1,366 Mixed 1,294 SusWrite 1,090 306% 1,366 MB/s	4K Read 34.4 4K Write 43.4 4K Mixed 35.4 120% 37.7 MB/s	DQ Read 299 DQ Write 211 DQ Mixed 388 254% 299 MB/s
Poor: 274% ↑ This bench: 184% Great: 488%
Kingston A400 120GB-$30 166,392 User benchmarks, average bench 61% 111GB free Firmware: 03150002 SusWrite @10s intervals: 159 114 48 51 52 55 MB/s Performing below potential (13^th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable	43.5% Average	Read 214 Write 180 Mixed 166 SusWrite 79.8 36% 160 MB/s	4K Read 14.5 4K Write 32.7 4K Mixed 26.4 73% 24.5 MB/s	DQ Read 156 DQ Write 137 DQ Mixed 116 96% 137 MB/s
Poor: 33% ↑ This bench: 43.5% Great: 85%
WD Blue 1TB (2012)-$37 3,105,054 User benchmarks, average bench 83% 185GB free Firmware: 01.01A01 SusWrite @10s intervals: 104 133 130 112 120 143 MB/s Performing as expected (47^th percentile)	82.9% Excellent	Read 165 Write 163 Mixed 80.5 SusWrite 124 97% 133 MB/s	4K Read 1.2 4K Write 2.3 4K Mixed 1.2 226% 1.57 MB/s
Poor: 52% ↑ This bench: 82.9% Great: 109%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Samsung M393A1G40EB1-CRC 2x8GB 197 User benchmarks, average bench 64% 2 of 8 slots used 16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2400 MHz Performing way below expectations (7^th percentile)	52.6% Above average	MC Read 19.8 MC Write 21.2 MC Mixed 18.7 57% 19.9 GB/s	SC Read 4 SC Write 10.8 SC Mixed 10.2 24% 8.33 GB/s	Latency 79.2 50% 79.2 ns
Poor: 49% ↑ This bench: 52.6% Great: 73%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 18%

Surfboard

Desktop 79%

Battleship

Workstation 16%

Surfboard

GPU
Quadro K2200Nvidia $440Bench 16%, 13,860 samples	740x
Quadro M4000NvidiaBench 32%, 9,043 samples	376x
Quadro K4200Nvidia $820Bench 21%, 7,330 samples	223x

SSD
SM961 NVMe PCIe M.2 512GBSamsungBench 238%, 21,542 samples	144x
SM961 NVMe PCIe M.2 256GBSamsungBench 219%, 21,747 samples	129x
A400 240GBKingston $28Bench 66%, 424,288 samples	122x

RAM
M393A1G40DB0-CPB 2x8GBSamsungBench 60%, 1,030 samples	184x
M393A1G40DB0-CPB 4x8GBSamsungBench 93%, 970 samples	177x
M393A2G40DB0-CPB 2x16GBSamsungBench 59%, 1,132 samples	157x

Value: 9% - Terrible

Total price: $440

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16