Today's hottest deals

HP Compaq Elite 8300 SFF

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 2%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 58%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 1%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (75th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 25 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 70.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics1.6% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory10GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 10GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
SystemHP Compaq Elite 8300 SFF  (all builds)
MotherboardHewlett-Packard 3397
Memory6.8 GB free of 10 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1024 x 768 - 32 Bit colores
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20130716
Uptime1.8 Days
Run DateDec 22 '21 at 17:42
Run Duration167 Seconds
Run User ARG-User
Background CPU7%

 PC Performing above expectations (75th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-3470-$69
Intel(R) Core(TM) i5-3470 CPU @ 3.20GHz, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.2 GHz, turbo 3.4 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (93rd percentile)
70.4% Very good
Memory 79.8
1-Core 90.1
2-Core 181
68% 117 Pts
4-Core 354
8-Core 355
47% 354 Pts
64-Core 349
22% 349 Pts
Poor: 50%
This bench: 70.4%
Great: 71%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel HD 2500 (Desktop 1.05 GHz)
HP(103C 3397) 2GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 10.18.10.5161
Performing above expectations (75th percentile)
1.6% Terrible
Lighting 1.9
Reflection 3
Parallax 1.5
2% 2.13 fps
MRender 3.1
Gravity 1.1
Splatting 2.1
2% 2.1 fps
Poor: 1%
This bench: 1.6%
Great: 2%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 500GB-$14
417GB free (System drive)
Firmware: KC65
SusWrite @10s intervals: 93 87 94 114 86 107 MB/s
Performing as expected (55th percentile)
60.5% Good
Read 114
Write 119
Mixed 58.9
SusWrite 96.8
71% 97.2 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 1
4K Mixed 0.8
132% 0.8 MB/s
Poor: 27%
This bench: 60.5%
Great: 88%
Samsung SP2004C 200GB-$46
164GB free
Firmware: VM100-33
SusWrite @10s intervals: 57 55 56 56 56 56 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (98th percentile)
31.8% Below average
Read 54.2
Write 57.9
Mixed 42.3
SusWrite 56
39% 52.6 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 2
4K Mixed 0.8
151% 1.13 MB/s
Poor: 14%
This bench: 31.8%
Great: 32%
TOSHIBA MK3265GS 320GB
270GB free, PID 1068
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 28 27 28 29 28 28 MB/s
Performing as expected (57th percentile)
15.1% Very poor
Read 31.9
Write 25.7
Mixed 23.2
SusWrite 28
36% 27.2 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 1.4
4K Mixed 0.6
70% 0.83 MB/s
Poor: 14%
This bench: 15.1%
Great: 20%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M378B1G73QH0-CK0 830B NT2GC64B88G0NF-CG 10GB
1333, 1333 MHz
8192, 2048 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
31.1% Below average
MC Read 10.3
MC Write 10.4
MC Mixed 9.5
29% 10.1 GB/s
SC Read 9.1
SC Write 11.2
SC Mixed 9.4
28% 9.9 GB/s
Latency 80.9
49% 80.9 ns
Poor: 31%
This bench: 31.1%
Great: 32%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Compaq Elite 8300 SFF Builds (Compare 5,573 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 6%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 59%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 6%
Tree trunk

System: HP Compaq Elite 8300 SFF

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 74% - Very good Total price: $94
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $210Nvidia RTX 4060 $285WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $125
Intel Core i5-12600K $160Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $389WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $80
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $330
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback