Today's hottest deals

Wibtek G41-M

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 17%
Surfboard
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing way below expectations (12th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 88 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith an extremely low single core score, this CPU can barely handle email and light web browsing. Finally, with a gaming score of 19.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is terrible.
Graphics1.78% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory4GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 4GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (12%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
MotherboardWibtek G41-M  (all builds)
Memory1.8 GB free of 4 GB @ 0 GHz
Display1280 x 1024 - 32 Bit renk
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20111125
Uptime2 Days
Run DateJan 11 '21 at 13:37
Run Duration117 Seconds
Run User TUR-User
Background CPU 12%

 PC Performing way below expectations (12th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core2 Duo E6550-$18
CPU 1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads
Base clock 2.35 GHz, turbo 2.35 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (2nd percentile)
19.1% Very poor
Memory 33.3
1-Core 18.4
2-Core 16.9
17% 22.9 Pts
4-Core 28.1
8-Core 50.7
5% 39.4 Pts
64-Core 43.4
3% 43.4 Pts
Poor: 26%
This bench: 19.1%
Great: 43%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GeForce GT 430
Device(0000 0000) 2GB
CLim: 700 MHz, MLim: 250 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 391.35
Performing way below expectations (10th percentile)
1.78% Terrible
Lighting 2
Reflection 3.2
Parallax 0.7
2% 1.97 fps
MRender 2.6
Gravity 2.1
Splatting 2.8
2% 2.5 fps
Poor: 2%
This bench: 1.78%
Great: 4%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung SP2004C 200GB-$46
61GB free (System drive)
Firmware: VM100-50
SusWrite @10s intervals: 22 28 28 19 31 30 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (7th percentile)
13.8% Very poor
Read 21.7
Write 35.4
Mixed 34.9
SusWrite 26.1
22% 29.5 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 1.1
4K Mixed 0.7
119% 0.77 MB/s
Poor: 14%
This bench: 13.8%
Great: 32%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 2x2GB
2 of 4 slots used
4GB DIMM SDRAM
Performing below expectations (28th percentile)
13.9% Very poor
MC Read 4.6
MC Write 4.8
MC Mixed 5
14% 4.8 GB/s
SC Read 3.2
SC Write 4
SC Mixed 4.5
11% 3.9 GB/s
Latency 236
17% 236 ns
Poor: 10%
This bench: 13.9%
Great: 44%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical G41-M Builds (Compare 9 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 5%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 42%
Speed boat
Workstation
Workstation 4%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: Wibtek G41-M

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 57% - Above average Total price: $63
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $210Nvidia RTX 4060 $285WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $125
Intel Core i5-12600K $160Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $389WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $80
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $330
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback