HP ENVY x360 Convertible 13-ay0xxx

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 19%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 85%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 18%
Surfboard
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (57th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 43 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 87.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics12.4% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive139% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
SystemHP ENVY x360 Convertible 13-ay0xxx  (all builds)
MotherboardHP 876E
Memory3 GB free of 8 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display1440 x 900 - 32 Bit colori
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20200602
Uptime0 Days
Run DateDec 17 '21 at 11:29
Run Duration169 Seconds
Run User ITA-User
Background CPU4%

 PC Performing as expected (57th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 5 4500U
FP6, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 6 threads
Base clock 2.4 GHz, turbo 3.75 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
87.7% Excellent
Memory 76
1-Core 136
2-Core 273
87% 162 Pts
4-Core 541
8-Core 734
81% 637 Pts
64-Core 715
44% 715 Pts
Poor: 47%
This bench: 87.7%
Great: 84%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD RX Vega 8 4000 (iGPU)
HP(103C 876E) 512MB
Ram: 512MB, Driver: 21.10.20.04
Performing as expected (49th percentile)
12.4% Very poor
Lighting 15.1
Reflection 16.3
Parallax 20.2
12% 17.2 fps
MRender 13.2
Gravity 15.4
Splatting 17
13% 15.2 fps
Poor: 8%
This bench: 12.4%
Great: 17%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
WDC PC SN520 SDAPNUW-512G-1006 512GB
363GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 20120006
SusWrite @10s intervals: 599 595 532 530 400 519 MB/s
Performing below expectations (24th percentile)
139% Outstanding
Read 1035
Write 508
Mixed 421
SusWrite 529
138% 623 MB/s
4K Read 39
4K Write 45.2
4K Mixed 41.1
136% 41.8 MB/s
DQ Read 915
DQ Write 117
DQ Mixed 204
229% 412 MB/s
Poor: 101%
This bench: 139%
Great: 219%
WDC WD25 00BEVS-22UST0 250GB
172GB free, PID 0c31
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 5 5.1 5.1 5 5.1 5.1 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (14th percentile)
5.92% Terrible
Read 26.3
Write 5
Mixed 8
SusWrite 5
12% 11.1 MB/s
4K Read 0.4
4K Write 0.3
4K Mixed 0.4
25% 0.37 MB/s
Poor: 6%
This bench: 5.92%
Great: 18%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Micron MT40A512M16TB-062E:J 2x4GB
2 of 2 slots used
8GB Row of chips DDR4 clocked @ 3200 MHz
Performing way above expectations (97th percentile)
84.6% Excellent
MC Read 33.7
MC Write 31.4
MC Mixed 28
89% 31 GB/s
SC Read 19.3
SC Write 32
SC Mixed 19.9
68% 23.7 GB/s
Latency 88.3
45% 88.3 ns
Poor: 53%
This bench: 84.6%
Great: 85%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical ENVY x360 Convertible 13-ay0xxx Builds (Compare 397 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 17%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 74%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 15%
Surfboard

System: HP ENVY x360 Convertible 13-ay0xxx

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $154Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $388WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $90
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $353
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback