Asrock FM2A58M-DG3+

Performance Results


Gaming 2% Tree trunk	Desktop 37% Jet ski	Workstation 2% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (27th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 73 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 35.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is poor.
Graphics	1.8% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	33% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory	4GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 4GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Very high background CPU (100%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

Run History

2 years ago, 2 years ago.

Motherboard	Asrock FM2A58M-DG3+ (all builds)
Memory	1.6 GB free of 4 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display	Цвета: 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20160111
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Dec 16 '21 at 11:31
Run Duration	165 Seconds
Run User	UKR-User
Background CPU	100%

PC Performing below expectations (27^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
AMD A4-5300 APU-$36 7,032 User benchmarks, average bench 40% CPUSocket, 1 CPU, 1 cores, 2 threads Base clock 3.4 GHz, turbo 3.45 GHz (avg) Performing below expectations (29^th percentile)	35.1% Below average	Memory 55.9 1-Core 45.7 2-Core 84.8 39% 62.1 Pts	4-Core 85.6 8-Core 83.8 11% 84.7 Pts	64-Core 84.7 5% 84.7 Pts
Poor: 24% ↑ This bench: 35.1% Great: 51%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GeForce 9500 GT 27,834 User benchmarks, average bench 2% Asus(1043 82FD) 1GB Ram: 1GB, Driver: 342.01 Performing as expected (59^th percentile)	1.8% Terrible	Lighting 2 Reflection 1 Parallax 0.5 2% 1.17 fps	MRender 3.4 Gravity 1.7 Splatting 2.7 2% 2.6 fps
Poor: 1% ↑ This bench: 1.8% Great: 2%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Team L5 LITE SSD 60GB 101 User benchmarks, average bench 49% 6GB free (System drive) Firmware: 0818 SusWrite @10s intervals: 85 81 109 112 109 113 MB/s Performing below potential (1^st percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable	33% Below average	Read 227 Write 107 Mixed 124 SusWrite 102 31% 140 MB/s	4K Read 16.7 4K Write 36.4 4K Mixed 7.7 54% 20.3 MB/s	DQ Read 20.6 DQ Write 72.8 DQ Mixed 10.2 18% 34.5 MB/s
Poor: 38% ↑ This bench: 33% Great: 60%
Seagate ST31000333AS 1TB-$750 12,067 User benchmarks, average bench 52% 218GB free Firmware: CC1H SusWrite @10s intervals: 76 92 98 102 100 103 MB/s Performing as expected (42^nd percentile)	48.8% Average	Read 74.7 Write 60 Mixed 54 SusWrite 95 52% 70.9 MB/s	4K Read 0.6 4K Write 1.7 4K Mixed 0.9 156% 1.07 MB/s
Poor: 33% ↑ This bench: 48.8% Great: 66%
Kingston DataTraveler 100 G3 USB 3.0 32GB-$9 66,405 User benchmarks, average bench 16% 0GB free, PID 1666 Operating at USB 2.1 Speed Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete		Read 32.5 Write 13.8 Mixed 18.8 25% 21.7 MB/s	4K Read 3.2 4K Write 0.4 4K Mixed 0 26% 1.2 MB/s
Poor: 6% Great: 28%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Samsung M391B5673FH0-CH9 2x2GB 94 User benchmarks, average bench 45% 2 of 2 slots used 4GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1333 MHz Performing way below expectations (7^th percentile)	27.4% Poor	MC Read 12.1 MC Write 6.3 MC Mixed 9.9 27% 9.43 GB/s	SC Read 7.7 SC Write 7.4 SC Mixed 10.1 24% 8.4 GB/s	Latency 140 28% 140 ns
Poor: 27% ↑ This bench: 27.4% Great: 54%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical FM2A58M-DG3+ Builds (Compare 40 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 6%

Tree trunk

Desktop 47%

Yacht

Workstation 5%

Tree trunk

Motherboard: Asrock FM2A58M-DG3+

CPU
Athlon II X4 860KAMD $51Bench 45%, 29,887 samples	7x
Athlon X4 840 Quad CoreAMDBench 45%, 4,588 samples	3x
A8-5600K APUAMD $250Bench 49%, 14,744 samples	3x

GPU
Radeon R7 GraphicsAMDBench 5%, 22,117 samples	5x
GeForce 210NvidiaBench 1%, 98,254 samples	2x
GTX 560Nvidia $180Bench 14%, 23,273 samples	2x

SSD
A400 120GBKingston $28Bench 61%, 166,392 samples	4x
Trion 150 240GBOCZ $196Bench 79%, 15,660 samples	2x
SSD 128GBIntensoBench 63%, 1,375 samples	2x

RAM
CL9-9-9 DDR3 1600 Kingston 9905584-003.A00LF 8GBUnknownBench 33%, 6 samples	3x
CT51264BA160BJ.M8F CT51264BA160BJ.C8F 8GBUnknownBench 34%, 41 samples	2x
Fury DDR3 1866 C10 2x8GBHyperXBench 59%, 122,541 samples	2x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 51% - Above average

Total price: $79

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $254	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $163	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $31	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $37	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16