Asus TUF GAMING H570-PRO WIFI

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 21%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 102%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 20%
Surfboard
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing way above expectations (94th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 6 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. This PC is likely operated by a technical master!
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 108%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is outstanding.
Graphics8.53% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive458% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
Run History
2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago. (Only the first run influences device rankings)
MotherboardAsus TUF GAMING H570-PRO WIFI  (all builds)
Memory12.7 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display1920x1080x4294967296 szín
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20211027
Uptime0 Days
Run DateDec 10 '21 at 21:29
Run Duration147 Seconds
Run User HUN-User
Background CPU9%

 PC Performing way above expectations (94th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-11600-$140
LGA1200, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 2.8 GHz, turbo 4.45 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
108% Outstanding
Memory 95.6
1-Core 171
2-Core 318
107% 195 Pts
4-Core 651
8-Core 983
101% 817 Pts
64-Core 1,163
72% 1,163 Pts
Poor: 89%
This bench: 108%
Great: 104%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel UHD Graphics 750
Asus(1043 8694) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 27.20.100.9127
Performing way above expectations (99th percentile)
8.53% Terrible
Lighting 10.2
Reflection 15.5
Parallax 11.3
8% 12.3 fps
MRender 13.1
Gravity 11
Splatting 9.4
9% 11.2 fps
Poor: 5%
This bench: 8.53%
Great: 8%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Seagate FireCuda 530 ZP1000GM30013 1TB
259GB free (System drive)
Firmware: SU6SM001
SusWrite @10s intervals: 3947 4083 3281 1811 1834 1834 MB/s
Performing above expectations (83rd percentile)
458% Outstanding
Read 1,851
Write 4,307
Mixed 2,506
SusWrite 2,798
653% 2,866 MB/s
4K Read 84.6
4K Write 335
4K Mixed 132
474% 184 MB/s
DQ Read 1,859
DQ Write 1,147
DQ Mixed 1,474
1,106% 1,493 MB/s
Poor: 236%
This bench: 458%
Great: 508%
Samsung 860 Evo 500GB-$80
1GB free
Firmware: RVT04B6Q
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 468
Write 407
Mixed 392
94% 422 MB/s
4K Read 49.8
4K Write 140
4K Mixed 70.2
240% 86.7 MB/s
DQ Read 370
DQ Write 314
DQ Mixed 343
257% 342 MB/s
Poor: 74% Great: 129%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
G Skill Intl F4-4266C19-8GTZA 2x8GB
2 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 2133 MHz clocked @ 4266 MHz
Performing way above expectations (93rd percentile)
142% Outstanding
MC Read 56.4
MC Write 54.9
MC Mixed 46.4
150% 52.6 GB/s
SC Read 27.4
SC Write 46.9
SC Mixed 37.7
107% 37.3 GB/s
Latency 55.4
72% 55.4 ns
Poor: 76%
This bench: 142%
Great: 142%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical TUF GAMING H570-PRO WIFI Builds (Compare 1,070 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 105%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 105%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 105%
UFO

Motherboard: Asus TUF GAMING H570-PRO WIFI

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 94% - Outstanding Total price: $619
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $254Nvidia RTX 4060 $300Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $175Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $32Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback