Today's hottest deals

Asrock X670E PG Lightning

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 152%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 117%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 194%
UFO
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (59th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 41 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle intensive workstation, and even full-fledged server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 118%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is outstanding.
Graphics128% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive508% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
SystemAsrock X670E PG Lightning  (all builds)
MotherboardASRock X670E PG Lightning
Memory24.9 GB free of 32 GB @ 4.8 GHz
Display3440 x 1440 - 32 Bit colors, ,
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20230426
Uptime0 Days
Run DateSep 27 '23 at 16:07
Run Duration312 Seconds
Run User FIN-User
Background CPU1%
Watch Gameplay: 2080 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing as expected (59th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 9 7950X3D-$449
AM5, 1 CPU, 16 cores, 32 threads
Base clock 4.2 GHz, turbo 5.15 GHz (avg)
Performing below expectations (25th percentile)
118% Outstanding
Memory 76.8
1-Core 214
2-Core 432
123% 241 Pts
4-Core 846
8-Core 1,609
146% 1,228 Pts
64-Core 3,584
222% 3,584 Pts
Poor: 113%
This bench: 118%
Great: 125%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 2080-$270
Nvidia(10DE 1E87) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 2175 MHz, MLim: 3500 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 456.71
Performing below potential (78th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
128% Outstanding
Lighting 173
Reflection 174
Parallax 176
141% 174 fps
MRender 189
Gravity 152
Splatting 126
124% 156 fps
Poor: 109%
This bench: 128%
Great: 134%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Seagate FireCuda 530 ZP1000GM30013 1TB
651GB free (System drive)
Firmware: SU6SM005
SusWrite @10s intervals: 4915 4989 2270 1839 1657 1615 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (95th percentile)
508% Outstanding
Read 3,020
Write 4,677
Mixed 3,004
SusWrite 2,881
769% 3,395 MB/s
4K Read 71.5
4K Write 310
4K Mixed 122
428% 168 MB/s
DQ Read 1,904
DQ Write 1,640
DQ Mixed 1,874
1,376% 1,806 MB/s
Poor: 236%
This bench: 508%
Great: 508%
HyperX Fury 120GB-$160
19GB free
Firmware: 583ABBF0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 86 82 64 63 72 76 MB/s
Performing below potential (34th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
59.9% Above average
Read 246
Write 120
Mixed 153
SusWrite 73.7
33% 148 MB/s
4K Read 25.4
4K Write 112
4K Mixed 29.6
136% 55.7 MB/s
DQ Read 88.4
DQ Write 125
DQ Mixed 96.4
76% 103 MB/s
Poor: 52%
This bench: 59.9%
Great: 75%
Crucial MX300 750GB-$160
70GB free
Firmware: M0CR011
SusWrite @10s intervals: 281 281 280 157 86 282 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (18th percentile)
77.3% Very good
Read 396
Write 273
Mixed 177
SusWrite 228
60% 269 MB/s
4K Read 20.1
4K Write 111
4K Mixed 24.6
121% 51.9 MB/s
DQ Read 246
DQ Write 272
DQ Mixed 125
131% 214 MB/s
Poor: 67%
This bench: 77.3%
Great: 104%
Kingston SKC3000D2048G 2TB
835GB free
Firmware: EIFK31.6
SusWrite @10s intervals: 5064 2742 2106 1800 1486 1482 MB/s
Performing above expectations (65th percentile)
473% Outstanding
Read 2,850
Write 4,711
Mixed 3,484
SusWrite 2,447
765% 3,373 MB/s
4K Read 67.6
4K Write 310
4K Mixed 123
424% 167 MB/s
DQ Read 1,864
DQ Write 1,647
DQ Mixed 1,773
1,324% 1,761 MB/s
Poor: 268%
This bench: 473%
Great: 601%
Samsung 970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 1TB-$116
19GB free
Firmware: 1B2QEXM7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 2,620
Write 2,490
Mixed 1,893
520% 2,334 MB/s
4K Read 69.3
4K Write 187
4K Mixed 99
331% 118 MB/s
DQ Read 1,672
DQ Write 1,492
DQ Mixed 1,596
1,193% 1,587 MB/s
Poor: 188% Great: 410%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Corsair Vengeance RGB DDR5 6000 C30 2x16GB-$104
2 of 4 slots used
32GB DIMM 22h clocked @ 4800 MHz
Performing way above expectations (98th percentile)
235% Outstanding
MC Read 162
MC Write 50.9
MC Mixed 63.4
263% 92.1 GB/s
SC Read 46.9
SC Write 56.3
SC Mixed 48.8
145% 50.7 GB/s
Latency 86.2
46% 86.2 ns
Poor: 141%
This bench: 235%
Great: 212%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 72 60 60 34" 1280 720 SAM0BFD SE790C
Typical X670E PG Lightning Builds (Compare 61 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 412%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 118%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 420%
UFO

System: Asrock X670E PG Lightning

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 72% - Very good Total price: $2,460
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $210Nvidia RTX 4060 $285WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $125
Intel Core i5-12600K $154Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $389WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $80
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $320
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback