| PC Status | Overall this PC is performing below expectations (40th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 60 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas. |
| Processor | With a relatively low single core score, this CPU can handle email, light web browsing and basic audio/video playback, but it will struggle to handle CPU intensive tasks. Finally, with a gaming score of 30.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is poor. |
| Graphics | 11.9% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks. |
| Boot Drive | 62.5% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times. |
| Memory | 16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing. |
| OS Version | Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option. |
Very high background CPU (83%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
| Motherboard | Asrock Q1900M (all builds) |
| Memory | 12.2 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.3 GHz |
| Display | 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colori |
| OS | Windows 10 |
| BIOS Date | 20181220 |
| Uptime | 0 Days |
| Run Date | Dec 08 '21 at 19:01 |
| Run Duration | 184 Seconds |
| Run User | ITA-User |
| Background CPU | 83% |
PC Performing below expectations (40th percentile)
Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).
| Processor | Bench | Normal | Heavy | Server |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Intel Celeron J1900
CPUSocket, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2 GHz, turbo 2.4 GHz (avg)
|
30.4%
Below average
|
25% 37.3 Pts
|
12% 86.9 Pts
|
5% 85.1 Pts
|
| Graphics Card | Bench | 3D DX9 | 3D DX10 | 3D DX11 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Nvidia GT 1030
MSI(1462 8C98) 2GB
CLim: 1949 MHz, MLim: 525 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 471.41
|
11.9%
Very poor
|
12% 13.1 fps
|
11% 13 fps
| |
| Drives | Bench | Sequential | Random 4k | Deep queue 4k |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Crucial MX500 500GB-$53
429GB free (System drive)
Firmware: M3CR033
SusWrite @10s intervals: 207 164 205 205 211 237 MB/s
|
62.5%
Good
|
52% 233 MB/s
|
100% 32.6 MB/s
|
138% 189 MB/s
|
|
WD Green 1TB (2011)-$109
90GB free
Firmware: 51.0AB51
SusWrite @10s intervals: 102 99 102 104 106 106 MB/s
|
58.7%
Above average
|
68% 92.8 MB/s
|
156% 1.1 MB/s
| |
|
TrekStor DS maxi classic 1TB
209GB free, PID 0020
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 35 33 35 35 35 37 MB/s
|
17.5%
Very poor
|
41% 30.9 MB/s
|
80% 0.97 MB/s
| |
| Memory Kit | Bench | Multi core | Single core | Latency |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Kingston 99U5471-052.A00LF PSD38G16002 16GB
1333, 1333 MHz
8192, 8192 MB
|
25.7%
Poor
|
28% 9.77 GB/s
|
12% 4.17 GB/s
|
23% 176 ns
|
System Memory Latency Ladder
L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds
Typical Q1900M Builds (Compare 201 builds)
See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
|
|
|
Motherboard: Asrock Q1900M
| GPU |
|
|---|---|
| HD Graphics (Bay Trail 0.667 - 0.854 GHz)IntelBench 1%, 90,156 samples | 131x |
| R7 240AMDBench 5%, 58,337 samples | 8x |
| GeForce GT 710NvidiaBench 3%, 187,161 samples | 8x |
| EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER | Value: 21% - Poor | Total price: $28 |