Asrock H61M-GS

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 26%
Raft
Desktop
Desktop 78%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 21%
Surfboard
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (51st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 49 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 73.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics30% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
MotherboardAsrock H61M-GS  (all builds)
Memory12.9 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20110307
Uptime0 Days
Run DateApr 13 '21 at 14:36
Run Duration126 Seconds
Run User GBR-User
Background CPU7%
Watch Gameplay: 1050-Ti + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing as expected (51st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-2600K-$319
CPUSocket, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.4 GHz, turbo 3.5 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (67th percentile)
73.2% Very good
Memory 87.8
1-Core 95.1
2-Core 186
72% 123 Pts
4-Core 318
8-Core 461
49% 389 Pts
64-Core 463
29% 463 Pts
Poor: 56%
This bench: 73.2%
Great: 83%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1050-Ti-$59
CLim: 1961 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 465.89
Performing below potential (76th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
30% Poor
Lighting 38
Reflection 42
Parallax 38.9
31% 39.6 fps
MRender 37.9
Gravity 39.4
Splatting 28.1
28% 35.1 fps
Poor: 27%
This bench: 30%
Great: 33%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Adata SU655 480GB
271GB free
Firmware: P190710b
SusWrite @10s intervals: 193 197 194 191 193 192 MB/s
Performing below potential (12th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
46.7% Average
Read 202
Write 186
Mixed 185
SusWrite 194
43% 192 MB/s
4K Read 23.5
4K Write 29.1
4K Mixed 23.8
82% 25.5 MB/s
DQ Read 23.4
DQ Write 39.9
DQ Mixed 23.3
20% 28.9 MB/s
Poor: 41%
This bench: 46.7%
Great: 102%
WD Blue 320GB (2007)-$65
177GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 01.03E01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 36 16 12 33 72 76 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (9th percentile)
27.8% Poor
Read 55.6
Write 76
Mixed 37.3
SusWrite 40.8
38% 52.4 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.7
4K Mixed 0.6
127% 1 MB/s
Poor: 23%
This bench: 27.8%
Great: 58%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston 99U5471-052.A00LF PSD38G16002 16GB
1333, 1333 MHz
8192, 8192 MB
Performing way above expectations (90th percentile)
49.5% Average
MC Read 17.4
MC Write 17.5
MC Mixed 15.5
48% 16.8 GB/s
SC Read 14.3
SC Write 16.1
SC Mixed 15.6
44% 15.3 GB/s
Latency 69.8
57% 69.8 ns
Poor: 25%
This bench: 49.5%
Great: 49%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical H61M-GS Builds (Compare 172 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 15%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 71%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 12%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: Asrock H61M-GS

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 52% - Above average Total price: $231
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $164Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $149
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $249Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $359
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback