Asrock Q1900M

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 9%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 43%
Speed boat
Workstation
Workstation 8%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (30th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 70 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a relatively low single core score, this CPU can handle email, light web browsing and basic audio/video playback, but it will struggle to handle CPU intensive tasks. Finally, with a gaming score of 31.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is poor.
Graphics20.9% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive62.3% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
MotherboardAsrock Q1900M  (all builds)
Memory12.3 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colori
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20181220
Uptime0 Days
Run DateDec 03 '20 at 14:02
Run Duration153 Seconds
Run User ITA-User
Background CPU6%

 PC Performing below expectations (30th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Celeron J1900
CPUSocket, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2 GHz, turbo 2.4 GHz (avg)
Performing below expectations (33rd percentile)
31.4% Below average
Memory 47.2
1-Core 22.9
2-Core 45.9
26% 38.7 Pts
4-Core 91.5
8-Core 91.7
12% 91.6 Pts
64-Core 91.5
6% 91.5 Pts
Poor: 24%
This bench: 31.4%
Great: 40%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD RX 560-$500
Asus(1043 052B) 2GB
CLim: 1176 MHz, MLim: 1750 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 20.11.3
Performing as expected (42nd percentile)
20.9% Poor
Lighting 26.7
Reflection 27.3
Parallax 38.5
22% 30.8 fps
MRender 25
Gravity 27.3
Splatting 20
19% 24.1 fps
Poor: 19%
This bench: 20.9%
Great: 25%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Crucial MX500 500GB-$40
419GB free (System drive)
Firmware: M3CR033
SusWrite @10s intervals: 184 199 217 220 230 234 MB/s
Performing below potential (2nd percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
62.3% Good
Read 212
Write 229
Mixed 230
SusWrite 214
50% 221 MB/s
4K Read 25.2
4K Write 42.6
4K Mixed 32.1
102% 33.3 MB/s
DQ Read 201
DQ Write 195
DQ Mixed 177
139% 191 MB/s
Poor: 78%
This bench: 62.3%
Great: 125%
WD Green 1TB (2011)-$109
41GB free
Firmware: 51.0AB51
SusWrite @10s intervals: 97 98 96 102 103 99 MB/s
Performing above expectations (68th percentile)
57% Above average
Read 99.5
Write 98.7
Mixed 78.9
SusWrite 99.1
70% 94.1 MB/s
4K Read 1
4K Write 1.6
4K Mixed 0.8
160% 1.13 MB/s
Poor: 28%
This bench: 57%
Great: 69%
WD My Book 1140 2TB
74GB free, PID 1140
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 32 33 35 35 36 36 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (17th percentile)
17.7% Very poor
Read 32.7
Write 36.3
Mixed 27.7
SusWrite 34.7
45% 32.8 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.7
4K Mixed 0.8
88% 1.07 MB/s
Poor: 14%
This bench: 17.7%
Great: 49%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston 99U5471-052.A00LF PSD38G16002 16GB
1333, 1333 MHz
8192, 8192 MB
Performing below potential (19th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
25.2% Poor
MC Read 8.9
MC Write 9.1
MC Mixed 10.5
27% 9.5 GB/s
SC Read 2.7
SC Write 5.3
SC Mixed 4.7
12% 4.23 GB/s
Latency 171
23% 171 ns
Poor: 25%
This bench: 25.2%
Great: 49%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Q1900M Builds (Compare 202 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 4%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 32%
Sail boat
Workstation
Workstation 4%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: Asrock Q1900M

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 21% - Poor Total price: $28
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $164Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $149
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $249Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $359
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback