HP ENVY TE01-0xxx

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 38%
Jet ski
Desktop
Desktop 88%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 39%
Jet ski
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (47th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 53 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 80.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics43.7% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive108% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
SystemHP ENVY TE01-0xxx  (all builds)
MotherboardHP 8653
Memory1.4 GB free of 8 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20201109
Uptime2.4 Days
Run DateDec 03 '21 at 18:10
Run Duration213 Seconds
Run User IRL-User
Background CPU6%
Watch Gameplay: 1650 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing as expected (47th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-9700F-$289
U3E1, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3 GHz, turbo 4.4 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (8th percentile)
80.3% Excellent
Memory 81
1-Core 141
2-Core 283
91% 168 Pts
4-Core 425
8-Core 1,089
86% 757 Pts
64-Core 1,075
66% 1,075 Pts
Poor: 74%
This bench: 80.3%
Great: 100%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1650-$155
HP(103C 8558) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 2100 MHz, MLim: 2000 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 472.47
Performing above expectations (81st percentile)
43.7% Average
Lighting 57
Reflection 57.5
Parallax 50.1
46% 54.9 fps
MRender 43.3
Gravity 51.4
Splatting 46.3
38% 47 fps
Poor: 39%
This bench: 43.7%
Great: 46%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Kbg30zmv256g KIOXIA 256GB
56GB free (System drive)
Firmware: ADHA0102
SusWrite @10s intervals: 117 208 217 277 209 198 MB/s
Performing as expected (49th percentile)
108% Outstanding
Read 645
Write 80.4
Mixed 251
SusWrite 204
64% 295 MB/s
4K Read 42.1
4K Write 43.4
4K Mixed 54.1
156% 46.5 MB/s
DQ Read 654
DQ Write 254
DQ Mixed 284
255% 397 MB/s
Poor: 70%
This bench: 108%
Great: 152%
Toshiba X300 4TB-$146
3.5TB free
Firmware: FP1R
SusWrite @10s intervals: 172 177 174 184 173 177 MB/s
Performing above expectations (73rd percentile)
94.4% Outstanding
Read 151
Write 149
Mixed 64
SusWrite 176
98% 135 MB/s
4K Read 5.7
4K Write 2.3
4K Mixed 1
391% 3 MB/s
Poor: 57%
This bench: 94.4%
Great: 104%
HGST HTS 545050A7E380 500GB
290GB free, PID 2773
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 56 80 82 84 88 90 MB/s
Performing above expectations (65th percentile)
35.5% Below average
Read 98.8
Write 60.7
Mixed 29.4
SusWrite 79.8
85% 67.2 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 1.2
4K Mixed 0.5
60% 0.73 MB/s
Poor: 8%
This bench: 35.5%
Great: 43%
SAMSUNG HD501LJ 1TB
588GB free, PID 00b9
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 16 17 17 18 18 18 MB/s
Performing below expectations (25th percentile)
9.62% Terrible
Read 16.2
Write 16.4
Mixed 15.7
SusWrite 17.3
23% 16.4 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 1.1
4K Mixed 0.6
60% 0.73 MB/s
Poor: 10%
This bench: 9.62%
Great: 13%
ST1000LM 024 HN-M101MBB 1TB
735GB free, PID 2773
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 56 80 81 84 88 90 MB/s
Performing above expectations (63rd percentile)
33.6% Below average
Read 70.2
Write 19.9
Mixed 55.6
SusWrite 79.8
74% 56.4 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 1.9
4K Mixed 0.8
94% 1.1 MB/s
Poor: 10%
This bench: 33.6%
Great: 44%
SanDisk Cruzer Blade 64GB
54GB free, PID 5567
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 5.1 4.2 3.6 4.1 4.5 4.2 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (8th percentile)
5.07% Terrible
Read 10.7
Write 5.5
Mixed 9.5
SusWrite 4.2
10% 7.48 MB/s
4K Read 3.2
4K Write 0.6
4K Mixed 0.3
42% 1.37 MB/s
Poor: 5%
This bench: 5.07%
Great: 18%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M378A1K43CB2-CTD 1x8GB
1 of 2 slots used
8GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2666 MHz
Performing as expected (53rd percentile)
44.4% Average
MC Read 17.2
MC Write 15.6
MC Mixed 12.3
43% 15 GB/s
SC Read 13.7
SC Write 14.4
SC Mixed 13.9
40% 14 GB/s
Latency 78.8
51% 78.8 ns
Poor: 31%
This bench: 44.4%
Great: 51%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical ENVY TE01-0xxx Builds (Compare 428 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 10%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 75%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 9%
Tree trunk

System: HP ENVY TE01-0xxx

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 101% - Outstanding Total price: $131
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $254Nvidia RTX 4060 $300Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $163Nvidia RTX 4070 $539Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $31Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $37SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback