Today's hottest deals

Gigabyte X570 AORUS MASTER

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 105%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 103%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 133%
UFO
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (54th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 46 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle intensive workstation, and even full-fledged server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 103%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is outstanding.
Graphics99% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive189% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory64GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 64GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
2 years ago, 2 years ago.
MotherboardGigabyte X570 AORUS MASTER  (all builds)
Memory57.5 GB free of 64 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20200907
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJul 24 '22 at 23:34
Run Duration253 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU7%
Watch Gameplay: 5700-XT + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing as expected (54th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 9 5950X-$358
AM4, 1 CPU, 16 cores, 32 threads
Base clock 3.4 GHz, turbo 4.5 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (72nd percentile)
103% Outstanding
Memory 82
1-Core 165
2-Core 328
102% 192 Pts
4-Core 658
8-Core 1,312
116% 985 Pts
64-Core 3,176
196% 3,176 Pts
Poor: 90%
This bench: 103%
Great: 110%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD RX 5700-XT-$266
Ram: 8GB, Driver: 22.5.1
Performing below potential (60th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
99% Outstanding
Lighting 124
Reflection 142
Parallax 192
101% 153 fps
MRender 117
Gravity 142
Splatting 95.3
95% 118 fps
Poor: 91%
This bench: 99%
Great: 104%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Intel 660p NVMe PCIe M.2 1TB-$50
380GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 002C Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 893 102 103 106 101 106 MB/s
Performing as expected (57th percentile)
189% Outstanding
Read 1,420
Write 1,573
Mixed 1,103
SusWrite 235
242% 1,083 MB/s
4K Read 58.8
4K Write 162
4K Mixed 77.7
275% 99.7 MB/s
DQ Read 634
DQ Write 860
DQ Mixed 267
336% 587 MB/s
Poor: 127%
This bench: 189%
Great: 255%
Crucial MX500 1TB-$80
375GB free
Firmware: M3CR022
SusWrite @10s intervals: 430 425 428 431 395 394 MB/s
Performing as expected (48th percentile)
107% Outstanding
Read 478
Write 433
Mixed 410
SusWrite 417
98% 435 MB/s
4K Read 40.4
4K Write 87.4
4K Mixed 51.1
173% 59.6 MB/s
DQ Read 216
DQ Write 186
DQ Mixed 182
142% 195 MB/s
Poor: 75%
This bench: 107%
Great: 125%
Crucial MX500 1TB-$80
429GB free
Firmware: M3CR033
SusWrite @10s intervals: 433 434 433 431 434 432 MB/s
Performing as expected (40th percentile)
105% Outstanding
Read 481
Write 437
Mixed 400
SusWrite 433
99% 438 MB/s
4K Read 35.3
4K Write 87.3
4K Mixed 50
164% 57.5 MB/s
DQ Read 194
DQ Write 183
DQ Mixed 183
139% 187 MB/s
Poor: 75%
This bench: 105%
Great: 125%
Toshiba X300 4TB-$116
1.5TB free
Firmware: FP1R
SusWrite @10s intervals: 107 103 110 106 108 110 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (6th percentile)
57.3% Above average
Read 92.1
Write 97.8
Mixed 51.9
SusWrite 107
64% 87.2 MB/s
4K Read 1.2
4K Write 2
4K Mixed 1.1
209% 1.43 MB/s
Poor: 57%
This bench: 57.3%
Great: 104%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
G.SKILL F4-3600C18-32GTZN 2x31.5GB
2 of 4 slots used
63GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2666 MHz
Performing way above expectations (98th percentile)
147% Outstanding
MC Read 103
MC Write 34
MC Mixed 36.6
165% 57.8 GB/s
SC Read 27.1
SC Write 20.1
SC Mixed 32.6
76% 26.6 GB/s
Latency 77
52% 77 ns
Poor: 72%
This bench: 147%
Great: 139%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical GA-X570 AORUS MASTER Builds (Compare 5,178 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 184%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 104%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 201%
UFO

Motherboard: Gigabyte X570 AORUS MASTER - $276

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 79% - Very good Total price: $1,308
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $165Nvidia RTX 4060 $280WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $129
Intel Core i5-13600K $210Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $389WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $80
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $389
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback