Performance Results


Gaming 90% Nuclear submarine	Desktop 79% Battleship	Workstation 82% Aircraft carrier


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (29th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 71 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 73.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics	120% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive	117% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory	64GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 64GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

High background CPU (27%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

Motherboard	Asrock B365 Phantom Gaming 4 (all builds)
Memory	58.2 GB free of 64 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors, 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20200514
Uptime	4.2 Days
Run Date	Nov 17 '22 at 23:08
Run Duration	206 Seconds
Run User	USA-User
Background CPU	27%

PC Performing below expectations (29^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i7-9700F-$295 54,980 User benchmarks, average bench 92% CPUSocket, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 8 threads Base clock 3 GHz, turbo 3 GHz (avg) Performing way below expectations (5^th percentile)	73.8% Very good	Memory 78.1 1-Core 93.7 2-Core 187 68% 120 Pts	4-Core 374 8-Core 678 63% 526 Pts	64-Core 720 45% 720 Pts
Poor: 74% ↑ This bench: 73.8% Great: 100%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia RTX 2070S (Super)-$210 663,603 User benchmarks, average bench 115% Asus(1043 8717) ≥ 4GB CLim: 2100 MHz, MLim: 3500 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 526.86 Performing above expectations (84^th percentile)	120% Outstanding	Lighting 159 Reflection 153 Parallax 153 130% 155 fps	MRender 187 Gravity 133 Splatting 119 116% 146 fps
Poor: 105% ↑ This bench: 120% Great: 123%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Intel 660p NVMe PCIe M.2 512GB-$60 162,275 User benchmarks, average bench 156% 77GB free (System drive) Firmware: 002C Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s SusWrite @10s intervals: 276 123 59 76 35 12 MB/s Performing way below expectations (14^th percentile)	117% Outstanding	Read 1,231 Write 865 Mixed 818 SusWrite 96.9 167% 753 MB/s	4K Read 31.3 4K Write 60.2 4K Mixed 39.2 130% 43.6 MB/s	DQ Read 333 DQ Write 654 DQ Mixed 220 245% 402 MB/s
Poor: 94% ↑ This bench: 117% Great: 209%
Samsung 980 NVMe PCIe M.2 1TB-$94 262,559 User benchmarks, average bench 251% 331GB free Firmware: 1B4QFXO7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s SusWrite @10s intervals: 1789 675 296 141 266 268 MB/s Performing way below expectations (12^th percentile)	175% Outstanding	Read 1,316 Write 1,611 Mixed 1,466 SusWrite 572 280% 1,241 MB/s	4K Read 31.1 4K Write 115 4K Mixed 41.4 161% 62.4 MB/s	DQ Read 991 DQ Write 746 DQ Mixed 858 644% 865 MB/s
Poor: 149% ↑ This bench: 175% Great: 365%
Toshiba DT01ACA100 1TB-$31 763,289 User benchmarks, average bench 84% 918GB free Firmware: MS2OA8S0 SusWrite @10s intervals: 132 141 138 139 140 139 MB/s Performing below expectations (27^th percentile)	74.7% Very good	Read 122 Write 120 Mixed 17.5 SusWrite 138 72% 99.3 MB/s	4K Read 1 4K Write 2 4K Mixed 0.8 168% 1.27 MB/s
Poor: 47% ↑ This bench: 74.7% Great: 107%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Corsair CMW32GX4M2E3200C16 4x16GB 12,209 User benchmarks, average bench 87% 4 of 4 slots used 64GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz Performing below expectations (31^st percentile)	71.7% Very good	MC Read 25.4 MC Write 28.3 MC Mixed 23.1 73% 25.6 GB/s	SC Read 14.4 SC Write 30.3 SC Mixed 21.3 63% 22 GB/s	Latency 84.1 48% 84.1 ns
Poor: 62% ↑ This bench: 71.7% Great: 114%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 69%

Battle cruiser

Desktop 89%

Aircraft carrier

Workstation 58%

Gunboat

GPU
GTX 1660-TiNvidia $143Bench 76%, 318,562 samples	365x
GTX 1660S (Super)Nvidia $233Bench 71%, 428,800 samples	350x
RTX 2060Nvidia $324Bench 90%, 645,160 samples	282x

SSD
660p NVMe PCIe M.2 512GBIntel $60Bench 156%, 162,275 samples	238x
SSDPEKNW010T9 1TBIntelBench 216%, 20,963 samples	227x
660p NVMe PCIe M.2 1TBIntel $74Bench 191%, 163,917 samples	213x

RAM
TEAMGROUP-UD4-3200 2x8GBUnknownBench 85%, 99,207 samples	804x
TEAMGROUP-UD4-3000 2x8GBUnknownBench 82%, 74,390 samples	90x
TEAMGROUP-UD4-3200 4x8GBUnknownBench 89%, 16,526 samples	62x

Value: 106% - Outstanding

Total price: $305

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16